- It won't be signed by OLPC. You have to be on an unlocked XO, or be
a deployment signing your own builds.
Is there a reason why 8.2.2 doesn't get signed by OLPC?
I do understand that the main target group are big deployments which can
sign the build, but why are others excluded?
In the
I would prefer to see the backlight dimming take place on a longer
time scale (as Paul says, I'm frequently still reading when it happens)
and the suspend happening much more aggressively.
Does OHM have user configurable knobs ?
Cheers,
wad
On Nov 30, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
chris
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Philipp Kocher philipp.koc...@gmx.net wrote:
- It won't be signed by OLPC. You have to be on an unlocked XO, or be
a deployment signing your own builds.
Is there a reason why 8.2.2 doesn't get signed by OLPC?
I do understand that the main target group are big
Philipp -
An OS image signed by OLPC can be booted by any XO-1.0 laptop in the world,
except for those which have been reconfigured by a deployment to only respect
software signed by other security keys. That implies a higher level of testing
and certification than an image that can be
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os48
And as the wiki says - remember to use the latest OFW with it. My XO
had a bad case of psychedelic UI with q3a15, cured with q3a16...
m.
--
Hi,
I would prefer to see the backlight dimming take place on a
longer time scale (as Paul says, I'm frequently still reading
when it happens) and the suspend happening much more
aggressively.
Not quite sure what this means -- do you mean the dimming itself should
take longer, or
Hi,
Looking for the reasons for low throughput on the XO 1.5 I've come across
with the contention window's registers.
I've found that there are like eight queues and that for all of them the
CWmax and min are set as follows:
CWmin = 7 slots
CWmax = 31 slots
As I see it this would make for a
Just a reminder that it is easy to use fs-update on external SD cards as
well as the internal one. You just first have to type:
devalias fsdisk /sd/d...@1:0
Cheers,
wad
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os49
Compressed image size: 462.44mb (+51.16mb since build 48)
Description of changes in this build:
* OHM dims the backlight lower more gradually, but raises it immediately
* Pretty boot now extends until Sugar has come
Hi,
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os49
If you have a 1.5 B2 (which almost everyone with a 1.5 machine does)
and are using os47-os49, you'll need to turn off Automatic Power
Management in the Sugar control panel, else the wireless device will
go
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:12:20PM -0500, John Watlington wrote:
Just a reminder that it is easy to use fs-update on external SD cards as
well as the internal one. You just first have to type:
devalias fsdisk /sd/d...@1:0
Thanks. Updated http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5#External_SD
--
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os49
If you have a 1.5 B2 (which almost everyone with a 1.5 machine does)
and are using os47-os49, you'll need to turn off Automatic Power
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os50
Compressed image size: 462.60mb (+0.17mb since build 49)
Description of changes in this build:
* Wake-on-wlan works now, if you have a B2 with hardware mods or B3
* Remove default Jabber server (#9666)
Package
christoph wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os49
If you have a 1.5 B2 (which almost everyone with a 1.5 machine does)
and are using os47-os49, you'll
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
Mmm, I just tried updating my machine and it's been stuck at
Performing incremental rsync. for at least 20 minutes now.
To see if it is progressing, issue this command at a root shell prompt
while the olpc-update is running
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:31 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
Mmm, I just tried updating my machine and it's been stuck at
Performing incremental rsync. for at least 20 minutes now.
To see if it is progressing,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Christoph Derndorfer
christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:31 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:53:50AM +0100, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
Mmm, I just tried updating my machine and it's been stuck at
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Christoph Derndorfer
christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Christoph Derndorfer
christoph.derndor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:31 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 12:53:50AM
Hi Ed, Martin
What is the plan for the Fedora 11 build for XO-1, will OLPC sign such a
build or is 802 the last build signed by OLPC?
I don't think one of the two options is a good solution for small
deployments without a tech team.
I think for the case of Cambodia with many small deployments
it does not work
*make: Nothing to be done for `squid/squid-xs.conf'.*
thanks
El 1 de diciembre de 2009 04:01, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.comescribió:
2009/11/30 Henry Vélez Molina henry.lap...@gmail.com:
Whe I made make -f xs-config.make squid-xs.conf
this was the message
20 matches
Mail list logo
