Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:16:01PM -0400, Ton van Overbeek wrote:
For my testing for trac #7788 I want to switch from Update.1 to
joyride-2298 and vice versa
(using alternate boot).
After switching back from joyride-2298 to Update.1 most activities do
not start because
Trying to make it easier for everyone to install the latest joyride and
the latest activities on the XO from a USB drive, I've set up this page:
http://lumiere.ens.fr/~guerry/olpc_install_sugar_activities_usb.php
You can either download a zip containing sugar-stable (currently 708)
and the
My adventures in upgrading from 2269 to 2301.
* olpc-update joyride-2301
No problems.. very fast to update.
* Sugar / Control panel / 'Software Update' still doesn't work for me.
(Never has,I have /home/olpc/Activities directory with 18 activities, no
activity packs)
I suspect hanging
I propose reviving the use of a triangle for Acess Points. Triangles
shouldn't be shun away, after all the greeks loved them :)
If this was acepted, you could even make the school server AP be a variation
of this triangle, or wear a emblem, so as to be easily spotted in the
neighbourhood view.
Am I right in thinking that all yum installs are still failing because of
this? I'm testing joyride and can't seem to install any dependencies on any
of the three xo-'s I am upgrading. Or is this another problem? Is there an
alternative install method? Sorry if this is basic, but I'm stuck.
Hi,
I was wondering if you guys can tweak the system test a little bit. A test
that runs when I press left on circle bottons.
In the keyboard testing, is it possible for you to change it so that each
key has to be pressed? Then, we know which one is not working.
I used to work in a cellphone
Ixo X oxI wrote:
* When doing a 'shutdown', received the following error.
Stopping cerebro -p -i msh0 : [FAILED]
(a bunch of stuff [OK] )
Kill cerebro(pgid 1726) ? (Y/N) [FAILED]
Typed 'y' and nothing happened, had to do a 'hard reset' via button.
Saw exactly
Anyway, in the meantime, we have raw rpmbuild, mock (which needs to be
configured not to use Fedora's koji, but this is not so hard), our own
buildroot (probably hidden away somewhere on weka.laptop.org), and the
joyride dropbox system. In conclusion, we'll live.
I got an impression that all
sayamindu, The current layout is enough.
On 8/15/08, Zarro Boogs per Child [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#7899: Inclusion of Dzongkha keyboard in OLPC distribution
---+
Reporter: tenzin | Owner: sayamindu
Pia Waugh wrote:
Hi all,
I have a few projects I am helping support and was thinking about doing an
Ubuntu based XS option. I wanted to find out whether anyone else was
interested in this, and whether any work has been done. My reason for
wanting to do an Ubuntu version is purely because it
You can count me in on that... I've been pushing for debian or ubuntu
to be the XS platform for a while, and I know Martin Langhoff sort of
feels the same way... but since so much work has already been done on
Fedora, we should see how feasable it is to make 2 concurrent XS
rollouts... but yeah
Hi all,
One more argument for a debian based XS: Debian supports various non-x86
architectures, which are good candidates for a compact, affordable, and low
power XS server:
- The mipsel based fuloong mini ( http://www.lemote.com/english/fuloong.html )
engineered by the chinese Jiangsu Lemote
Hi all
For the porting efforts people can begin packaging the different software
tools, provided by the XS, without waiting for all the OS support.
For example the upgrade server was originally developed for debian.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Upgrade_server
Just a though. :).
On Sun, Aug 17,
Well, I received the AA's. As a quick test I plugged them into my F9
box, after using the olpc ifcfg-files as a template, with very little
fiddling I think I have them running under F9. I'll post the diff later.
More testing when the xo gets here, or my friend with a laptop.
What does need work
Hi all,
Firstly thanks for all the feedback. I want to ensure everyone knows this
isn't about undermining the great work already done on Fedora, but rather it
about I guess scratching an itch that a few people have. I think that where
possible we post the existing XS packages so that people can
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:41:13AM +1000, Pia Waugh wrote:
There are a few interesting feature requests I've had from local trials,
including the ability to only allow an XS to talk to approved XOs, to
avoid strangers parking outside a school with an XO and interacting with
children (worst case
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Jerry Vonau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I received the AA's. As a quick test I plugged them into my F9 box,
after using the olpc ifcfg-files as a template, with very little fiddling I
think I have them running under F9. I'll post the diff later.
More testing
Hi Michael,
quote who=Michael Stone
Uruguay already uses a Debian-basex XS (which is quite different from
Martin's) and which includes some MAC-address filtering technology.
(They've also expressed great interest in expanding this technology into
a full 802.11i/802.1x/EAP/RADIUS
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
off the top of my head:
Additional notes on this
- idmgr needs a rewrite, badly
- xs-cong is undergoing a big change
- libpam-sotp needs a security audit
there are more details in the bugtracker. And if anyone wants
Would be interesting to know more on Uruguay's Debian based XS.. any links?
Besides, if I remember correctly, I guess Tony Pearson was also part of
that team or maybe not. I have mixed feelings about the current XS
builds, guess I'd have preferred the XS being a lot more efficient and
to run
20 matches
Mail list logo
