Dear All,
Perhaps Afghanistan is not the first place you think of when considering
your next vacation or internship. But since OLPC are donating 10,000 G1G1
machines to Afghanistan and is working with the top level of the Ministry
of Education this could very well become a showpiece for OLPC in
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 19:12 -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>> gtk 2.14 has some good stuff, would be nice to start to rebase on
>> F10 ASAP so we don't have so much stress as with the F8 rebase.
>
> Once we decide to do this, we'll need to talk about who would do it --
> for the F7 rebase we had
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:06 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Yeah - the Fedora lifecycle does not end up being a good fit for us.
> There is no clear (supported) path to go from a Fedora ("bleeding
> edge") release to a LTS path with RHEL or CentOS.
>
> Is there any hints as to how that could be im
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Martin Langhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Working through the network setup, I spotted an opportunity that is
> possibly the easiest path - hand dhcp leases in this netblock on eth1:
>
> $ ipcalculator 172.18.0.0/21
Actually that walks over 172.18.1.1 which will
Working through the network setup, I spotted an opportunity that is
possibly the easiest path - hand dhcp leases in this netblock on eth1:
$ ipcalculator 172.18.0.0/21
Address: 172.18.0.0 10101100.00010010.0 000.
Netmask: 255.255.248.0 = 21 ..1 000.0
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Fantastic testing - thanks! More notes below...
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The automated kickstart install pauses at the method screen for input. This
>> could be avoided by adding method=cdrom:/dev/sr0 to the boot promp
Martin, you make some good points. Sorry for the late reply.
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 10:56 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> [Note: this is a resend - with some better editing - the earlier email
> got sent prematurely...]
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Bryan Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Fantastic testing - thanks! More notes below...
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The automated kickstart install pauses at the method screen for input. This
> could be avoided by adding method=cdrom:/dev/sr0 to the boot prompt for the
> kickstart install.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:15:31PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan the
> > development work we need to get done, regardless of whether that work will
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Martin Langhoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Grab it and take it for a spin
>> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/OLPCXS-0.5-dev5-i386.iso
>
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/OLPCXS-0.5-dev6-i386.iso
>
> is now slowly being copied to t
Does it make sense to have an afternoon or a full day about long-term
plans and their implications for immediate priorities and tests?
Try to capture topics that could be specific agenda items with their
own session or conversation -- by creating a separate thread about it
on the list, a separate
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We went through this early on in the development of the OLPC software
> stack. It became clear that we were not far enough along to be able to
> settle in on RHEL. Maybe we'll be at that point after another turn or
> two o
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Walter Bender wrote:
> We went through this early on in the development of the OLPC software
> stack. It became clear that we were not far enough along to be able to
> settle in on RHEL. Maybe we'll be at that point after another turn or
> two of the crank. Maybe the XS will b
Hi,
> gtk 2.14 has some good stuff, would be nice to start to rebase on
> F10 ASAP so we don't have so much stress as with the F8 rebase.
Once we decide to do this, we'll need to talk about who would do it --
for the F7 rebase we had J5, and then Dennis for F9, and it's not clear
who could
We went through this early on in the development of the OLPC software
stack. It became clear that we were not far enough along to be able to
settle in on RHEL. Maybe we'll be at that point after another turn or
two of the crank. Maybe the XS will be there sooner. But too much is
in flux.
-walter
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 13:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> do we plan to rebase to F10 for 9.1.0? I'm asking because I'd need to
>> know if I can depend on gtk 2.14...
>
> If not, then you're going to be basing on a Fe
We need to figure out how to start work that takes more than 5 - 6 months
NOW. I'm concerned that if we start the 9.2 planning meeting "after 9.1",
we will (yet again) discover that there's no time to do anything that takes
more than about 5 months. We need to break that cycle and try to figure o
On Oct 14 2008, at 15:13, John Watlington was caught saying:
>
> I get 898,452 KiB free, on several machines.
> How did you get 921,000 KiB free ?
My bad, accidently used 'df -H' instead of '-h' in my initial check.
So we now have ~878MiB available instead of 822. That's better but that
is still
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan the
> development work we need to get done, regardless of whether that work will
> be able to ship next March. At a certain point we will have some of
Estaré de licencia por maternidad hasta el 15 de enero. Por cualquier consulta
dirigirse al Ing. Andrés Bergeret: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Announcing the General Availability of XO Software Release 8.2.0
XO Software Release 8.2.0 was developed by OLPC engineers and the OLPC
open source community.
The XO and its software is the only major computing platform designed
specifically for the educational benefit of children in the developi
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:41 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll be giving a demo of some next-generation journal ideas (and code)
> at noon Wednesday at OLPC's 1cc offices. I'll make sure to have it
> recorded, and you can expect it posted online shortly afterwards (for
> all th
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan
Sounds like it is time for a naming contest for this [repeating]
event. Some that have been suggested / implied:
OLPCSW [08.11.1]
OLPC Miniconfer
This discussion should move to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as it refers to software
running on the laptop, not the server.
Some context for my comment: I had told them that we were
working with schools that were completely offline (although
with servers). The problem might have been a mismatch with
the
+1
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about Collaboration as project of the day?
>
> Isn't our collaboration framework already shipped in other distros?
> The problem is that few applications actually use it to allow easy
> collaboration among end-users.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:52 AM, seth vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can obsolete and conflict
>
> Obsoletes: pkgname=ver.rel
> Conflicts: pkgname=ver.rel
Great -- thanks! I'll do exactly this.
m
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
- ask interesting que
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:52 AM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've talked to Google specifically about using Gears on the XO.
> Once they understood OLPC's goals and operating environment,
> they didn't think Gears was appropriate. It was really designed
> for constant connectivit
How about Collaboration as project of the day?
Isn't our collaboration framework already shipped in other distros?
The problem is that few applications actually use it to allow easy
collaboration among end-users. There's probably some GUI work needed,
and some integration with each app.
If we co
I get 898,452 KiB free, on several machines.
How did you get 921,000 KiB free ?
wad
On Oct 13, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have updated the UBIFS 8.2 image on d.l.o with a
> new kernel that includes various backports from kernel.org.
> One major change that is noticeab
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:26:32PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have updated the UBIFS 8.2 image on d.l.o with a
> new kernel that includes various backports from kernel.org.
> One major change that is noticeable is that the free space
> calculation reports 921MiB free instead of 82
Hello,
The CFP for FOSS.in 2008, one of the largest Free/Open Source Software
conference in Asia, is out, and this time they are following a very
different format, with the emphasis on _producing code_. The CFP is at
http://foss.in/news/call-for-participation.html
I'm thinking of proposing OLPC a
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 13:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>>> do we plan to rebase to F10 for 9.1.0? I'm asking because I'd need to
>>> know if
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 13:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> do we plan to rebase to F10 for 9.1.0? I'm asking because I'd need to
>> know if I can depend on gtk 2.14...
>
> If not, then you're going to be basing on a Fe
Greg's User Feedback URLs of the Week (Spanish):
http://ceibalpuertosauce.blogspot.com/ and
http://www.ceibalbellaunion.blogspot.com/
Two great teacher generated blogs out of Uruguay showing how XOs and
activities are used in real schools.
Greg's User Feedback URLs of the Week (English):
http:/
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 13:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> do we plan to rebase to F10 for 9.1.0? I'm asking because I'd need to
> know if I can depend on gtk 2.14...
If not, then you're going to be basing on a Fedora release which will be
EOL'd[1] very soon after the OLPC release...
Jeremy
Wow, I don't understand. gears, according to the presentations out there is
intended to make run the application while offline ?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:52 PM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've talked to Google specifically about using Gears on the XO.
> Once they understood
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Right now, revisor can build a pristine F9 installer CD but cannot
>> build a F9 + updates installer CD.
>>
>> The problem appears by merely enabling the additional repo in the
>> stock F9 config files that ship with Revis
Marco -
I think this is one of the important questions we should be discussing
in the near term. I'm not advocating either for or against it, but
simply that it is something we should consider seriously. That
includes identifying all the consequences/implications of rebasing on
F10, alo
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Right now, revisor can build a pristine F9 installer CD but cannot
> build a F9 + updates installer CD.
>
> The problem appears by merely enabling the additional repo in the
> stock F9 config files that ship with Revisor. It has also been
> reported elsewhere: https://fedo
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 18:49 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Mike McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you go this route, I think what you want is obsoletes. Obsoletes says
> > "this packages replaces this one." Conflicts says "this package cannot be
> > installe
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> After 2 weeks of not building the XS build, I built it again today. It
> didn't want to build. Running with --debug 10 the output ends with...
>
> Running command: /usr/bin/xsltproc --novalid -o
> /var/tmp/revisor-pungi/0.5/xs-f9-i386/comps.xml
> /usr/share/revisor/comps/c
Hi,
I've an idea. I don't really know if it'll work...
I think rather than doing a video streaming, it might be better to use Web
2.0 and send a series of 'good' quality still images. I do not know about
the feasibility factor but I think this would be a better option than video
conferencing. Esp
Am 14.10.2008 um 05:01 schrieb James Cameron:
> Added a --mirror flag to joyride-activities.py so that the script
> can be
> used on a system without dbus or sugar, in order to create a mirror of
> the activity files for later pickup.
>
> git clone http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/berts-script.git
43 matches
Mail list logo