Software developers needed for OLPC Afghanistan

2008-10-14 Thread Svetlana Senajova
Dear All, Perhaps Afghanistan is not the first place you think of when considering your next vacation or internship. But since OLPC are donating 10,000 G1G1 machines to Afghanistan and is working with the top level of the Ministry of Education this could very well become a showpiece for OLPC in

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Jeremy Katz
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 19:12 -0400, Chris Ball wrote: >> gtk 2.14 has some good stuff, would be nice to start to rebase on >> F10 ASAP so we don't have so much stress as with the F8 rebase. > > Once we decide to do this, we'll need to talk about who would do it -- > for the F7 rebase we had

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Jeremy Katz
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:06 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Yeah - the Fedora lifecycle does not end up being a good fit for us. > There is no clear (supported) path to go from a Fedora ("bleeding > edge") release to a LTS path with RHEL or CentOS. > > Is there any hints as to how that could be im

Re: [Server-devel] For xs-0.4 setups wanting many clients on the LAN port (AP setups)

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Working through the network setup, I spotted an opportunity that is > possibly the easiest path - hand dhcp leases in this netblock on eth1: > > $ ipcalculator 172.18.0.0/21 Actually that walks over 172.18.1.1 which will

[Server-devel] For xs-0.4 setups wanting many clients on the LAN port (AP setups)

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
Working through the network setup, I spotted an opportunity that is possibly the easiest path - hand dhcp leases in this netblock on eth1: $ ipcalculator 172.18.0.0/21 Address: 172.18.0.0 10101100.00010010.0 000. Netmask: 255.255.248.0 = 21 ..1 000.0

Re: [Server-devel] Getting closer: XS-0.5-dev5 "preview"

2008-10-14 Thread Jerry Vonau
Martin Langhoff wrote: > Fantastic testing - thanks! More notes below... > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The automated kickstart install pauses at the method screen for input. This >> could be avoided by adding method=cdrom:/dev/sr0 to the boot promp

Re: [Server-devel] physical security of the XS and XO-as-XS

2008-10-14 Thread Bryan Berry
Martin, you make some good points. Sorry for the late reply. On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 10:56 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: > [Note: this is a resend - with some better editing - the earlier email > got sent prematurely...] > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Bryan Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [Server-devel] Getting closer: XS-0.5-dev5 "preview"

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
Fantastic testing - thanks! More notes below... On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The automated kickstart install pauses at the method screen for input. This > could be avoided by adding method=cdrom:/dev/sr0 to the boot prompt for the > kickstart install.

Re: [sugar] 0.84/9.1 planning.

2008-10-14 Thread Erik Garrison
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:15:31PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan the > > development work we need to get done, regardless of whether that work will

Re: [Server-devel] Getting closer: XS-0.5-dev5 "preview"

2008-10-14 Thread Jerry Vonau
Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Martin Langhoff > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Grab it and take it for a spin >> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/OLPCXS-0.5-dev5-i386.iso > > http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/OLPCXS-0.5-dev6-i386.iso > > is now slowly being copied to t

Re: [sugar] 0.84/9.1 planning.

2008-10-14 Thread Samuel Klein
Does it make sense to have an afternoon or a full day about long-term plans and their implications for immediate priorities and tests? Try to capture topics that could be specific agenda items with their own session or conversation -- by creating a separate thread about it on the list, a separate

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We went through this early on in the development of the OLPC software > stack. It became clear that we were not far enough along to be able to > settle in on RHEL. Maybe we'll be at that point after another turn or > two o

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread david
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Walter Bender wrote: > We went through this early on in the development of the OLPC software > stack. It became clear that we were not far enough along to be able to > settle in on RHEL. Maybe we'll be at that point after another turn or > two of the crank. Maybe the XS will b

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, > gtk 2.14 has some good stuff, would be nice to start to rebase on > F10 ASAP so we don't have so much stress as with the F8 rebase. Once we decide to do this, we'll need to talk about who would do it -- for the F7 rebase we had J5, and then Dennis for F9, and it's not clear who could

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Walter Bender
We went through this early on in the development of the OLPC software stack. It became clear that we were not far enough along to be able to settle in on RHEL. Maybe we'll be at that point after another turn or two of the crank. Maybe the XS will be there sooner. But too much is in flux. -walter

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 13:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >> do we plan to rebase to F10 for 9.1.0? I'm asking because I'd need to >> know if I can depend on gtk 2.14... > > If not, then you're going to be basing on a Fe

Re: [sugar] 0.84/9.1 planning.

2008-10-14 Thread Ed McNierney
We need to figure out how to start work that takes more than 5 - 6 months NOW. I'm concerned that if we start the 9.2 planning meeting "after 9.1", we will (yet again) discover that there's no time to do anything that takes more than about 5 months. We need to break that cycle and try to figure o

Re: Updated UBIFS 8.2 image

2008-10-14 Thread Deepak Saxena
On Oct 14 2008, at 15:13, John Watlington was caught saying: > > I get 898,452 KiB free, on several machines. > How did you get 921,000 KiB free ? My bad, accidently used 'df -H' instead of '-h' in my initial check. So we now have ~878MiB available instead of 822. That's better but that is still

Re: [sugar] 0.84/9.1 planning.

2008-10-14 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan the > development work we need to get done, regardless of whether that work will > be able to ship next March. At a certain point we will have some of

Re: Devel Digest, Vol 32, Issue 61 (Licencia)

2008-10-14 Thread Fiorella Haim
Estaré de licencia por maternidad hasta el 15 de enero. Por cualquier consulta dirigirse al Ing. Andrés Bergeret: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

[Server-devel] Announcing the General Availability of XO Software Release 8.2.0

2008-10-14 Thread Greg Smith
Announcing the General Availability of XO Software Release 8.2.0 XO Software Release 8.2.0 was developed by OLPC engineers and the OLPC open source community. The XO and its software is the only major computing platform designed specifically for the educational benefit of children in the developi

Reminder: Demo of next-gen journal ideas *tomorrow noon* @ 1cc

2008-10-14 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:41 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll be giving a demo of some next-generation journal ideas (and code) > at noon Wednesday at OLPC's 1cc offices. I'll make sure to have it > recorded, and you can expect it posted online shortly afterwards (for > all th

Re: [sugar] 0.84/9.1 planning.

2008-10-14 Thread Samuel Klein
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would also like to stop calling this "9.1" planning. We need to plan Sounds like it is time for a naming contest for this [repeating] event. Some that have been suggested / implied: OLPCSW [08.11.1] OLPC Miniconfer

Re: [Server-devel] Offline moodle notes in moodle.org

2008-10-14 Thread John Watlington
This discussion should move to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as it refers to software running on the laptop, not the server. Some context for my comment: I had told them that we were working with schools that were completely offline (although with servers). The problem might have been a mismatch with the

Re: OLPC as Project of the Day at FOSS.in

2008-10-14 Thread Walter Bender
+1 On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:15 PM, John Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about Collaboration as project of the day? > > Isn't our collaboration framework already shipped in other distros? > The problem is that few applications actually use it to allow easy > collaboration among end-users.

Re: [Server-devel] Tying yum to a package "stream"?

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:52 AM, seth vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can obsolete and conflict > > Obsoletes: pkgname=ver.rel > Conflicts: pkgname=ver.rel Great -- thanks! I'll do exactly this. m -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect - ask interesting que

Re: [Server-devel] Offline moodle notes in moodle.org

2008-10-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:52 AM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've talked to Google specifically about using Gears on the XO. > Once they understood OLPC's goals and operating environment, > they didn't think Gears was appropriate. It was really designed > for constant connectivit

Re: OLPC as Project of the Day at FOSS.in

2008-10-14 Thread John Gilmore
How about Collaboration as project of the day? Isn't our collaboration framework already shipped in other distros? The problem is that few applications actually use it to allow easy collaboration among end-users. There's probably some GUI work needed, and some integration with each app. If we co

Re: Updated UBIFS 8.2 image

2008-10-14 Thread John Watlington
I get 898,452 KiB free, on several machines. How did you get 921,000 KiB free ? wad On Oct 13, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Deepak Saxena wrote: > > Hi, > > I have updated the UBIFS 8.2 image on d.l.o with a > new kernel that includes various backports from kernel.org. > One major change that is noticeab

Re: Updated UBIFS 8.2 image

2008-10-14 Thread Erik Garrison
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:26:32PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: > > Hi, > > I have updated the UBIFS 8.2 image on d.l.o with a > new kernel that includes various backports from kernel.org. > One major change that is noticeable is that the free space > calculation reports 921MiB free instead of 82

OLPC as Project of the Day at FOSS.in

2008-10-14 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
Hello, The CFP for FOSS.in 2008, one of the largest Free/Open Source Software conference in Asia, is out, and this time they are following a very different format, with the emphasis on _producing code_. The CFP is at http://foss.in/news/call-for-participation.html I'm thinking of proposing OLPC a

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 13:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >>> do we plan to rebase to F10 for 9.1.0? I'm asking because I'd need to >>> know if

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 13:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >> do we plan to rebase to F10 for 9.1.0? I'm asking because I'd need to >> know if I can depend on gtk 2.14... > > If not, then you're going to be basing on a Fe

Greg Smith Weekly Report for Week Ending 10/10

2008-10-14 Thread Greg Smith
Greg's User Feedback URLs of the Week (Spanish): http://ceibalpuertosauce.blogspot.com/ and http://www.ceibalbellaunion.blogspot.com/ Two great teacher generated blogs out of Uruguay showing how XOs and activities are used in real schools. Greg's User Feedback URLs of the Week (English): http:/

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Jeremy Katz
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 13:34 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > do we plan to rebase to F10 for 9.1.0? I'm asking because I'd need to > know if I can depend on gtk 2.14... If not, then you're going to be basing on a Fedora release which will be EOL'd[1] very soon after the OLPC release... Jeremy

Re: [Server-devel] Offline moodle notes in moodle.org

2008-10-14 Thread Ludo (Marc Alier)
Wow, I don't understand. gears, according to the presentations out there is intended to make run the application while offline ? On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:52 PM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've talked to Google specifically about using Gears on the XO. > Once they understood

Re: [Server-devel] Revisor / yum odd error with f9 updates.newkey repo: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package glibc-2.8-3.i386

2008-10-14 Thread Connie Sieh
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Martin Langhoff wrote: >> Right now, revisor can build a pristine F9 installer CD but cannot >> build a F9 + updates installer CD. >> >> The problem appears by merely enabling the additional repo in the >> stock F9 config files that ship with Revis

Re: Fedora 10 for 9.1.0?

2008-10-14 Thread Ed McNierney
Marco - I think this is one of the important questions we should be discussing in the near term. I'm not advocating either for or against it, but simply that it is something we should consider seriously. That includes identifying all the consequences/implications of rebasing on F10, alo

Re: [Server-devel] Revisor / yum odd error with f9 updates.newkey repo: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package glibc-2.8-3.i386

2008-10-14 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen
Martin Langhoff wrote: > Right now, revisor can build a pristine F9 installer CD but cannot > build a F9 + updates installer CD. > > The problem appears by merely enabling the additional repo in the > stock F9 config files that ship with Revisor. It has also been > reported elsewhere: https://fedo

Re: [Server-devel] Tying yum to a package "stream"?

2008-10-14 Thread seth vidal
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 18:49 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Mike McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you go this route, I think what you want is obsoletes. Obsoletes says > > "this packages replaces this one." Conflicts says "this package cannot be > > installe

Re: [Server-devel] revisor - strange regression with comps-cleanup misplaced...

2008-10-14 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen
Martin Langhoff wrote: > After 2 weeks of not building the XS build, I built it again today. It > didn't want to build. Running with --debug 10 the output ends with... > > Running command: /usr/bin/xsltproc --novalid -o > /var/tmp/revisor-pungi/0.5/xs-f9-i386/comps.xml > /usr/share/revisor/comps/c

Re: [Health] VideoChat is working now - hooray!

2008-10-14 Thread Harshvardhan
Hi, I've an idea. I don't really know if it'll work... I think rather than doing a video streaming, it might be better to use Web 2.0 and send a series of 'good' quality still images. I do not know about the feasibility factor but I think this would be a better option than video conferencing. Esp

Re: joyride-activities.py --mirror

2008-10-14 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Am 14.10.2008 um 05:01 schrieb James Cameron: > Added a --mirror flag to joyride-activities.py so that the script > can be > used on a system without dbus or sugar, in order to create a mirror of > the activity files for later pickup. > > git clone http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/berts-script.git