On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:21:18PM -0500, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> I'm no expert, but making the system work well without overcommit would
> probably require extensive modifications to the python interpreter, the
> fd.o libraries (dbus, gstreamer, telepathy, etc.), gecko, and maybe even
> X.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, John Gilmore wrote:
>> On a different note, one test we might think about running is the
>> closest thing the industry has to a "standard" battery life test. It's
>> specified on a lot of the netbook specs.
>>
>> It's defined here: http://it.jeita.or.jp/mobile/e/index.html
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I recently learned a few very important things about Linux memory
management (I'm speaking about how its supposed to work, irrespective of
any bugs). Operating systems experts already know all of this, but I did not.
1. Malloc lies. It will happily
> On a different note, one test we might think about running is the
> closest thing the industry has to a "standard" battery life test. It's
> specified on a lot of the netbook specs.
>
> It's defined here: http://it.jeita.or.jp/mobile/e/index.html
>
> However, I'm also seeing that a lot of ve
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:30 PM, wrote:
>>> In countries all over the world, XOs are *actually arriving in
>>> children's hands*.
>>> --scott
>>>
>>> [*] "roughly" means there are lots of minor details I'm omitting; Peru
>>
>> rough numbers
Reuben,
I was able to reproduce and work around the rpmdb version problem you
found today on a new Intrepid vm I created on weka.l.o. Would you mind
retesting with my new 767 compilation?
(To do so, just wipe the compilation and re-clone it. I modified the
cloning instructions so that, in the fu
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:30 PM, wrote:
>> In countries all over the world, XOs are *actually arriving in
>> children's hands*.
>> --scott
>>
>> [*] "roughly" means there are lots of minor details I'm omitting; Peru
>
> rough numbers are good enough for answering critics who claim that OLPC
> is
Hi Philipp,
I am not sure if this helps, but our apache config file has this for
the Scratch file extension:
AddType application/x-scratch-project sb
My impression is that what you descrie has to do more with how the XO
operating system handles the Scratch file type and/or with how to
create t
Thu, 4 Dec 2008 02:17:26 -0600, "Gabriel Burt"
wrote:
1. Project name : Retroscope
Done. Your tree is here:
git+ssh://gb...@dev.laptop.org/git/activities/retroscope
Please follow instructions here for importing your project:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Importing_your_project
Let us know if you ha
http://www2.infopresse.com/blogs/actualites/archive/2008/12/15/article-29417.aspx
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
Hi All,
Thanks for all the feedback on my questions about what it would take to
run a slimmed down Fedora 10 on the XO NAND.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2008-December/msg00022.html
To reiterate, the goal is one distribution with two Desktop Environments
(Sugar and one "stan
John,
does Scratch accept a .sb file on its command line?
If so, the launcher script could get the file from the Journal and
pass it on.
- Bert -
On 15.12.2008, at 18:53, John Maloney wrote:
> Hi, Phillipp.
>
> Thanks for reporting this problem. I believe there is a way to tell
> the XO to a
Hi, Phillipp.
Thanks for reporting this problem. I believe there is a way to tell
the XO to associate the .sb file extension with Scratch. I will look
into that and let you know if I figure it out.
-- John
On Dec 14, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Philipp Kocher wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 15:25, Jim Gettys wrote:
>
> A Mongolian version of 8.2 has been installed in the Ulaanbaatar
> schools. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive. When David Cavallo
> visited a school where the new version is in use, the teachers actually
> shook his hand because they liked
On Dec 15 2008, at 08:23, Deepak Saxena was caught saying:
> nn Dec 12 2008, at 11:34, Mikus Grinbergs was caught saying:
> > WARNING -- since about build 2590 I can get my "permanent" SD card
> > (ext2 filesystem) completely corrupted - I've had to restore it
> > twice. [This is a regression -
nn Dec 12 2008, at 11:34, Mikus Grinbergs was caught saying:
> WARNING -- since about build 2590 I can get my "permanent" SD card
> (ext2 filesystem) completely corrupted - I've had to restore it
> twice. [This is a regression - with 2583 and earlier I never saw
> any SD corruption. Note that
Hey Chris,
Awesome, thanks for testing!
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Chris Marshall
wrote:
> * The display update seems to be by continuous stroke:
> XO #1 user draws a curve not lifting pen. After the stylus
> is lifted from the tablet the stroke updates on XO #2.
That's intentional,
Le lundi 15 décembre 2008 à 11:09 +0100, Peter Robinson a écrit :
> >> F-10 doesn't have dbus-glib 0.78, only 0.76 so I can't add this to
> >> joyride yet. Do we want an OLPC-4 branch for dbus-glib to handle this?
> >
> > I think we can wait that the updated package reach F-10.
> >
> >> Collabora,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 12:09, Peter Robinson wrote:
> BTW I noticed this changelog entry in the rawhide version of
> telepathy-salut "Enable OLPC support code. It is not used unless a
> client explicitely requests them." would this mean that the forks
> aren't required when this gets pushed to th
>> F-10 doesn't have dbus-glib 0.78, only 0.76 so I can't add this to
>> joyride yet. Do we want an OLPC-4 branch for dbus-glib to handle this?
>
> I think we can wait that the updated package reach F-10.
>
>> Collabora, is this relevant to OLPC? If not, we can hold off on
>> packaging this for now
Le lundi 15 décembre 2008 à 10:07 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit :
> > * dbus-glib 0.78 (fixes support for complex types in hashtables)
>
> F-10 doesn't have dbus-glib 0.78, only 0.76 so I can't add this to
> joyride yet. Do we want an OLPC-4 branch for dbus-glib to handle this?
I think we can wai
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:45, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> The "I accidentally an entire call *and* MUC" release.
>>>
>>> Tarball:
>>> http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-gabble/telepathy-gabble-0.7.17.tar.gz
>>> Signature:
>>> http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-gabb
>> The "I accidentally an entire call *and* MUC" release.
>>
>> Tarball:
>> http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-gabble/telepathy-gabble-0.7.17.tar.gz
>> Signature:
>> http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-gabble/telepathy-gabble-0.7.17.tar.gz.asc
>> Git repository:
>>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 20:33, Robert McQueen
wrote:
> The "I accidentally an entire call *and* MUC" release.
>
> Tarball:
> http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-gabble/telepathy-gabble-0.7.17.tar.gz
> Signature:
> http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/releases/telepathy-gabble/telepathy
24 matches
Mail list logo
