Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:36 PM, César D. Rodas cro...@paraguayeduca.org wrote: Hi, The problem with the camera seems to be the xf86-video-geode package. The cafe_ccic module is loaded automatically. Cheese and recordactivity crashed right before show any picture. Then I tested remotely with

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread D. Rodas
Hello Peter, On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 08:45 +, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:36 PM, César D. Rodas cro...@paraguayeduca.org wrote: Hi, The problem with the camera seems to be the xf86-video-geode package. The cafe_ccic module is loaded automatically. Cheese and

secure boot- Can't mount root filesystem. Was: Problem with dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.4

2009-12-17 Thread Esteban Bordón
Hi Daniel, I'm testing secure boot in F11-XO1 (os10). When XO boots in secure boot the lease file doesn't read from USB key. I disabled the activation in dracut and I reinstalled dracut-olpc-modules and kernel and I signed them. This log is displayed when I turn on the XO: [2.907314] brd:

Re: secure boot- Can't mount root filesystem. Was: Problem with dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.4

2009-12-17 Thread Daniel Drake
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 11:40 -0200, Esteban Bordón wrote: Hi Daniel, I'm testing secure boot in F11-XO1 (os10). When XO boots in secure boot the lease file doesn't read from USB key. I disabled the activation in dracut and I reinstalled dracut-olpc-modules and kernel and I signed them.

Re: secure boot- Can't mount root filesystem. Was: Problem with dracut-modules-olpc-0.2.4

2009-12-17 Thread Esteban Bordón
I forgot tell you, I'm working with the latest version of dracut-olpc-modules (0.3.2). I'll try do something with this. Regards. 2009/12/17 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 11:40 -0200, Esteban Bordón wrote: Hi Daniel, I'm testing secure boot in F11-XO1 (os10).

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread Peter Robinson
Hi César, The problem with the camera seems to be the xf86-video-geode package. The cafe_ccic module is loaded automatically. Cheese and recordactivity crashed right before show any picture. Then I tested remotely with ssh -X and it worked for olpc and root user and it works. This

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread D. Rodas
Hi Peter, On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 14:18 +, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi César, The problem with the camera seems to be the xf86-video-geode package. The cafe_ccic module is loaded automatically. Cheese and recordactivity crashed right before show any picture. Then I tested remotely with

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, César D. Rodas cro...@paraguayeduca.org wrote: Hi Peter, On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 14:18 +, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi César, The problem with the camera seems to be the xf86-video-geode package. The cafe_ccic module is loaded automatically. Cheese and

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread D. Rodas
Hello, On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 15:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 2:47 PM, César D. Rodas cro...@paraguayeduca.org wrote: Hi Peter, On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 14:18 +, Peter Robinson wrote: Hi César, The problem with the camera seems to be the xf86-video-geode

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread Daniel Drake
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 15:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote: And we'll see where we need to go from there. If the problem appears to be in the geode driver, one thing you might consider doing is going back to the version that was shipped in 8.2. After 8.2, a new release was made with various

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread Peter Robinson
I'm looking forward to read clues about how to fix it. It sounds suspiciously like a Xv issue. That could be anything from a missing kernel module to a X driver bug. Out of interest can you play video using totem? Possibly record a video using a XO-1 with the working 802 build and see

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 15:11 +, Peter Robinson wrote: And we'll see where we need to go from there. If the problem appears to be in the geode driver, one thing you might consider doing is going back to the version that

Re: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 62

2009-12-17 Thread Daniel Drake
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 19:54 -0500, Chris Ball wrote: (Not sure why this build lost 3MB compared to the last one without any package changes -- we should diff the tarball to find out.) Uncompressed, os61.tree.tar has identical size to os62.tree.tar So this is just a LZMA compression thing, no

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread D. Rodas
Hi Peter, On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 16:33 +, Peter Robinson wrote: I'm looking forward to read clues about how to fix it. It sounds suspiciously like a Xv issue. That could be anything from a missing kernel module to a X driver bug. Out of interest can you play video using totem?

F11 for XO-1.5 Release Candidate 3

2009-12-17 Thread Chris Ball
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5 http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/f11-1.5/os64 Compressed image size: 700.19mb (-2.29mb since build 63) This is the third release candidate (RC3) for the XO-1.5 F11 release! We expect this build to become the first release build (10.1.0) for the 1.5 machines after

Re: a trac milestone for F11-for-XO1 work

2009-12-17 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:08:39PM -0300, C?sar D. Rodas wrote: I'm Cesar Rodas from Paraguay, as you might notice I'm new here, please be nice if I say something wrong :-) Welcome! I was talking to Raul and he told me we could help adding tickets for the XO1 (from the mailing list, and if

Re: New F11 for XO-1.5 build 62

2009-12-17 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 06:16:05PM +, Daniel Drake wrote: On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 19:54 -0500, Chris Ball wrote: (Not sure why this build lost 3MB compared to the last one without any package changes -- we should diff the tarball to find out.) Uncompressed, os61.tree.tar has identical

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread Neil Graham
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 11:47 -0300, César D. Rodas wrote: This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)'. I'm doing some work that uses xv on the XO. I found that this occurred for me when running X in 24bit, but 16bit was ok. I'm

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Neil Graham l...@screamingduck.com wrote: On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 11:47 -0300, César D. Rodas wrote: This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)'. I'm doing some work that uses xv on the XO. I

Re: [Server-devel] Ejabberd CPU/RAM Spike - Crashes

2009-12-17 Thread Devon Connolly
XS Version: 0.6 1 GB Physical Ram, 2GB Swap 154 XO's Registered, Any number connected when the problem happens, 0-XX The XS is controlling dhcp but nothing out of the ordinary as far as leases are concerned. No Active Antenna # /home/idmgr/list_registration http://pastebin.com/m762076bb #

Re: [Server-devel] Ejabberd CPU/RAM Spike - Crashes

2009-12-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Devon Connolly dev...@gmail.com wrote: XS Version: 0.6 1 GB Physical Ram, 2GB Swap Ok - the RAM is on the low side for an XS but should handle 150 ok. # ejabberdctl connected-users ... I counted 12 lines in the output of connected-users. That should not cause

Re: [Server-devel] Ejabberd CPU/RAM Spike - Crashes

2009-12-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Devon Connolly dev...@gmail.com wrote: XS Version: 0.6 1 GB Physical Ram, 2GB Swap Ok - the RAM is on the low side for an XS but should handle 150 ok. # ejabberdctl

Re: [Server-devel] Ejabberd CPU/RAM Spike - Crashes

2009-12-17 Thread Devon Connolly
The server had an uptime of about 50 days before this occurred. There were no problems and nothing has changed in the 2 or so days since this problem began. Like had said previously, it seems to have occurred since reflashing and re-registering a student's XO, but I believe that to be a

Re: [Server-devel] Ejabberd CPU/RAM Spike - Crashes

2009-12-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Devon Connolly dev...@gmail.com wrote: The server had an uptime of about 50 days before this occurred.  There were no problems and nothing has changed in the 2 or so days since this problem began.  Like had said previously, it seems to have occurred since