+2543,9 @@ read_config()
>
> wake_on_open=$(yes_or_true_to_boolean "$config_WAKE_WHEN_LID_OPENED")
>
> + if [ -z "$sleep_on_close" ] ; then
> +wake_on_open=true
> +fi
> }
>
> battery_shutdown()
> --
> 1.7.10
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
ixes/suggestions could end up there.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
# see if there's been activity during the recent idle period --
> @@ -1330,7 +1327,8 @@ general_inhibit()
>
> laptop_busy()
> {
> -general_inhibit || usb_inhibit || ttyusb_inhibit || cpu_or_network_busy
> +general_inhibit || usb_inhibit || ttyusb_inhibit || cpu_or
> # see if there's been activity during the recent idle period --
> @@ -1330,7 +1327,8 @@ general_inhibit()
>
> laptop_busy()
> {
> -general_inhibit || usb_inhibit || ttyusb_inhibit || cpu_or_network_busy
> +general_inhibit || usb_inhibit || ttyusb_inhi
eduardo h. silva wrote:
> 2012/5/18 Eduardo H. Silva :
> > 2012/5/17 Paul Fox :
> >> eduardo h. silva wrote:
> >> > 2012/5/17 Paul Fox :
> >> > > eduardo h. silva wrote:
> >> > > > xset q tells t
eduardo h. silva wrote:
> 2012/5/17 Paul Fox :
> > eduardo h. silva wrote:
> > > xset q tells that in 11.3.1, the pointer is configured with the values:
> > >
> > > acceleration 7/4 threshold: 1
> > >
> > > This takes 2, 3
with the older pre 11.3.* behavior.
so you think it was better, previously?
i wonder what has changed. those xset values were chosen specifically
to be appropriate for the original ALPS touchpad on XO-1. it's
entirely possible, now that we're two laptops and at least as many
touchpads beyond
you may need to set CROSS_COMPILE to a full path prefix, e.g.:
'export CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/local/cross/bin/armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabi-'
or, if your installation contains a bin directory with unprefixed names:
'export CROSS_COMPILE=/usr/local/cross
bert wrote:
> On 07.05.2012, at 19:05, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > bert wrote:
> >>
> >> On 07.05.2012, at 18:19, Paul Fox wrote:
> >>
> >>> bert wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm t
> > > > > > > RCX 1.0 = Infrared via serial (launched 1998)
> > > > > > > > RCX 2.0 = Infrared via USB tower (2001)
> > > > > > > > NXT = Bluetooth (2006)
> > > > > > > > WeDO = USB (2009
dea though. Currently it is
> > provided
> > > > by the "nqc" rpm.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > OTOH, there is no Sugar activity that uses the RCX, AFAIK. Worse,
> > I don't
> > > > even know any graphical Linux application to talk to the RCX. Do you?
> >
ne
> like this:
> BUS=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="04d8", ATTRS{idProduct}=="000[bc]", MODE="0666"
so this is new since the last we discussed special rules. okay.
> The latest build of Sugar have the udev for WeDo.Could be added the NXT
> rules.
>
bert wrote:
>
> On 07.05.2012, at 18:19, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > bert wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to connect a LEGO RCX via the RCX 2.0 USB Tower. When plugging
> >> it
> >> in, it gets listed with name and ven
iling
> myself?
i think the kernel is really missing that module. i'd never heard
of it until just now.
i'll see if we can get an rpm built for 11.3.0 and 11.3.1. (and 12.1.0)
paul
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
://build.laptop.org/12.1.0/os9/
> ___
> Techteam mailing list
> techt...@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/techteam
> ___
> Engineering mailing list
> engineer...@laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/engineering
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
kevin wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > sascha wrote:
> > >
> > > > i've cherry-picked 65a5f2b3 onto olpc-2.6.35, and the autobuilder
> > > > did the rest. this implements a new "libertas_disablemesh&
out having to build and maintain a custom kernel.
Based on a patch by Paul Fox .
Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville
-
>
> The reason we've not gone the module parameter route so far (in
> Dextrose 3) is that we didn't wa
12 at 2:24 AM, Ajay Garg wrote:
> > Thanks Paul.
> > I will test this, and get back to you once done.
> >
> > Thanks a ton
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ajay
> >
> > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
> >>
i586.rpm
paul
>
> cheers,
>
>
>
> m
> --
> martin.langh...@gmail.com
> mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
> - ask interesting questions
> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
> - http://wik
> >
> > You're right. When I wrote "hex digits" I actually meant to write "hex
> > bytes". i.e. I was not suggesting that we reduce the amount of data,
> > only change where it comes from.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
r...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
> - ask interesting questions
> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
> - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
ections?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> _______
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
ajay wrote:
> Thanks Paul.
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > ajay wrote:
> > > Any ideas please, regarding the two latest queries :) ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ajay
> > >
> >>
> >> Also in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
> >>
> >> change the plugins line to
> >>
> >> plugins=ifcfg-rh,keyfile
> >>
> >> Then add a section that looks like this.
> >>
> >> [keyfile]
>
ly suspending, or is it just that the
screen is dimming and blanking? the latter is expected. the
former may or not represent crack slippage.
paul
=-----
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://li
; -Read-97
> +Read-98
> -TurtleArt-136
> +TurtleArt-137
>
> Download from:
> http://build.laptop.org/12.1.0/os7/
> ___
> Techteam mailing list
> techt...@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/techteam
> _______
nicholas wrote:
> Is there a way to read the current value of the 1.75's ambient light
> sensor? It'd be neat if that could be displayed by an activity.
there is. turtleart can do this, i believe.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Light_Sensor#Programming
paul
=----------
ards, holding Fn will force the top row of
keys to generate F1 through F12.
finally: all of the above functionality is available from the
shell commandline:
$ olpc-brightness -h
usage: olpc-brightness [up|down|max|min|<0-15>|color|mono]
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@l
perately inhibit screen dim
as well. i haven't updated the docs or the comments in the
powerd script. bear with me.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
asking. (at least, i hope
not.)
paul
=---------
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
t;? "richard"?). it
would be a huge help if there could be a link to a page with a valid
user list -- updated once or a few times daily would be sufficient --
that could be used for reference.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
__
at's a very cool trick. So only XO-1.75 can be the host, but any XO
> model can be the target?
a cool trick indeed. now if james and mitch could just get OFW to
support python, there's a whole lot of middleware we could get rid of.
pa
; > > is briefly turned off and the connection is lost, negating any
> > > benefit from keeping it powered during sleep.
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > =-
> > paul fox, p...@laptop.org
> > ___
> >
jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:54 -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
> > jerry wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 16:44 +1100, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > This message was sent with a gsm dongl
aproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/olpc
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
e too much to ask for all
GSM devices to be in the same USB class. :-/
(maybe the module presence check is okay -- it just doesn't feel right.)
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
nnection is lost, negating any
> benefit from keeping it powered during sleep.
>
> Tony
>
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
s causing the problem.
i think mikus might be saying that without animation, it's harder to
tell that the boot has stopped. hopefully the much shorter boot times
will make that more obvious, after we all become used to the speedup.
(right now, given how we're used to pretty slow boots, it would be
easier to wait at a single dot for some time before realizing something
is wrong.)
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
hat happens if you simply install and run the gnome version of empathy
on an XO? that would seem like the first step. :-) (and i'm interested
in hearing how it works!)
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel ma
> -fprintf(zfile, "zblocks-end:\n");
> +fprintf(outfile, "zblocks-end:\nresize:\n");
> +fprintf(zfile, "zblocks-end:\nresize:\n");
>
> fclose(infile);
> fclose(outfile);
> --
> 1.7.9.1
>
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
t; login DOES ask for the
> "root" password, and authentication is successful upon entering the correct
> root-password.
>
> What is the reason for this difference in behaviour?
>
>
>
> It might very well be a design decision; just my bad
ing kernels can be fraught with peril, and hey, it's only disk
space.
go ahead and remove the old files, if you're confident.
paul
>
> Thanks
>
> KG
>
>
> >
> > Peter
> >
> part 2 text/plain 129
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
ou put a /boot/vmlinuz
> kernel in place too. But, run olpc-dev-kernel first, and things will
> work as before).
>
>
> Are developers prepared to put up with these 2 minor changes in the
> interest in solving this duplication problem?
is the duplication problem greater than simply the waste of disk space?
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 10:46 -0500, Paul Fox wrote:
> >
> > first, to clarify: "DCON" doesn't take over the system. powerd uses
> > the DCON to blank the screen -- that's all it does. it has no effect
> > whatsoever on wireless.
nt to
> > > trusting its feedback?
> > >
> > > > perhaps i don't understand the goal. i thought the problem you were
> > having
> > > > with your deployments was that idle suspend was interfering with
> > collaboration.
> &
jerry wrote:
>
> Hey Paul:
> I'm back, and I think I can explain this now once you patch powerd for
> some better logging around set_wake_on_wlan, that would be patch 1.
what version of powerd did you start from?
paul
=---------
paul fox
jerry wrote:
> Hi Paul:
>
> I'll see if I can be clearer in my explanation.
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 08:47 -0500, Paul Fox wrote:
> > hi jerry --
> >
> > jerry wrote:
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > While working wi
; +trace wlanpacket during $until
> selfinject fake_useractive $lastwakeup "$wakeupsource"
> -break
> +if [ "$XO" = 1.75 ]
> +then
> + break
>
rking machines, you'll see that the
very first character produced by OFW is '+'. or is
next, then the Forthmacs strings. i believe mitch uses every one of
those characters as a progress indication. dying as early as your
machine
#x27;ll check on that), and run far enough to cause a suspend -- but i'm
skeptical. (at that point the system was already in trouble, so
arguably suspending would be better than not, anyway.)
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
gument that it's almost useless... I think he is also
> > misunderstanding some aspects of it :-)
> >
>
> Well, we're testing this combination, someone has to take the lead.
> Without doing anything the XOs will never
opology awareness and routing, so if A can see B and B can see C,
then B will forward packets from A to C. that can't happen with
ad-hoc.
paul
>
> Sridhar
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
our build.
>
> Sridhar
>
>
> [1] https://dev.laptop.org.au/issues/1049
> [2] http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10363#comment:21
>
>
>
> Sridhar Dhanapalan
> Engineering Manager
> One Laptop per Child Australia
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
sridhar wrote:
> On 1 February 2012 15:43, Paul Fox wrote:
> > sridhar wrote:
> > > We are considering disabling Automatic Power Management because of its
> > > impact on collaboration and 3G connectivity.
> > >
> > > What kind of battery lif
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
u should do a new copy to .config, because there have been
cleanup changes.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
james wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 04:57:10PM -0500, Paul Fox wrote:
> > i would like to propose giving user-level read/write access to any
> > USB device which isn't an auto-mounted filesystem. perhaps an easier
> > rule would be, any non-storage USB device.
ed filesystem. perhaps an easier
rule would be, any non-storage USB device.
can anyone think of reasons that this would be unacceptable? (i assume,
but don't know, that this would not be hard to implement.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
los errores de tipeo.
> El 03/01/2012 12:12, "Paul Fox" escribió:
>
> > roughly speaking, we chose the "dialout" group because a) it's a
> > traditional group for access to UNIX serial devices, b) many USB
> > devices that activities need access
> write)
> If add this permissions to "lego" group, we need create it..
> But, we don't make it, an use an existing group like "root"? Or another...
> Suggestions?
> We can make a generic group "robot" that have permissions for: lego
r way. thanks!
paul
=-----
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
jonathan wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 14:21:23 -0500
> Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > > FWIW, my C1 will not boot with this version. Silly me, I didn't note
> > what
> > > release it had initially...q4c06 also fails (everything just stops after
> >
jonathan wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 19:19:49 -0500
> Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Firmware_q4c07
> >
> > this is primarily an EC release. it has numerous battery system
> > changes, and it introduces support for preserving
on b1/b2 machines too (also w/ h/w mod), but
my testing today showed it's not quite there.
paul
=-----
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
martin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
> > - hitting "brightness down" one more time when at level 0 will
> >switch to mono. users that use auto-repeat to get there probably
> >won't see a difference.
as discussed on t
bert wrote:
>
> On 24.11.2011, at 17:23, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > bert wrote:
> >>
> >> So I would rather not add that extra step "below 0".
> >
> > okay, i'm fine with that -- i was on the fence. but i think you and
> >
kevin wrote:
> I too will test this weekend. Silly q: should I test both sugar and
> gnome, or just sugar?
by all means, try both. it should work on VT console screens, too.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel m
bert wrote:
>
> On 24.11.2011, at 16:09, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > bert wrote:
> >> Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the
> >> week.
> So
> >> I took the 1.75 outside.
> >>
> >> IMHO the
>
> - Bert -
>
>
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
illing USB.
> >
> > Subsequent S/R cycles, perhaps benefit from a faster / different S/R
> > codepath
> that doesn't have to deal with USB.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> >
> > m
> > { Martin Langhoff - one laptop per child }
> >
C
> > - ask interesting questions
> > - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
> > - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
> > _______
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel@lists.laptop.org
>
sensor but surprisingly not the control keys
> >
> > i don't follow -- the code in powerd currently has (or should have) no
> > effect on how the brightness keys work. they're handled by
> > olpc-brightness. so they should continue doing what they were doing
> > before you modified those lines to reenable "zero brightness gives mono"
> > behavior.
>
> The brightness keys no longer give monochrome at zero brightness.
> You must have coded that somewhere in powerd? Line 1793 looked
> like it was going to be the culprit.
no, i coded it in /usr/bin/olpc-brightness. the code in powerd is there
for suspend dimming, and now, auto-backlight turnoff.
thanks,
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
change the limits directly and they
> > should take effect immediately.
> >
> > additionally, to cause auto-monochrome to happen, uncomment the
> > obvious lines at the end of set_brightness() and brightness_ramp().
> >
> > paul
> >
> > >
t in.
paul
=-----
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
i wrote:
>
> please try os12, when available, and see how it feels.
>
i'm afraid the necessary firmware didn't make the deadline for os12,
so you'll need to either wait for os13, or q4c05 firmware, whichever
comes first.
paul
=---------
p
tely.
additionally, to cause auto-monochrome to happen, uncomment the
obvious lines at the end of set_brightness() and brightness_ramp().
paul
>
> Tony
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org
bert wrote:
> On 21.11.2011, at 18:06, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > bert wrote:
> >> When you add the auto-turnoff, it should only toggle the backlight,
> >> not the mono-color setting. I don't think that would be too
> >> confusing, from a user's
> As for the undiscoverable control, make it a Sugar science activity.
> Give the user the actual sensor readings, sliders to control the
> thresholds and hysteresis, etc, and let them play with it. Teaches
> them about the sensor, the cir
bert wrote:
> On 21.11.2011, at 15:22, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > it quickly became clear (to me, at least) that it would be confusing
> > if user-dimming behaved differently than auto-backlight-control, with
> > respect to monochrome mode. whether or not it's con
re's no way to disable it. that will change,
but i'm not sure what form the UI might take.
paul
>
> Cheers,
>
> KG
>
>
> > paul
> >
> > [1] http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Display#The_theory
> > =-
> > paul fo
ile sleep 1
do
echo $(( i = ! i )) > /sys/devices/platform/dcon/monochrome
don
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
talk about this in the
abstract, since most of you don't have 1.75 machines to play with.
if you do have one, please try it when os12 comes out.
paul
[1] http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Display#The_theory
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
mikus wrote:
> My mistake - apologies.
>
> Turned out it was the SD card that had given up the ghost (and was
> non-responsive). When I inserted a different "external" SD card, it was
> correctly recognized by os1.
it's a feature! :-)
=--
kevin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> > > it seems that there's more interest in bluetooth support on the XO
> > > laptops than there has been in the past -- unsu
l, i realize) of our users.
please update http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/11285 with specific
suggestions or requirements. if someone would like to open an
equivalent ticket for userspace package requirements, that would be
dandy as well.
thanks!
paul
=---------
paul
p://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
> part 3 text/plain 129
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
martin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> > i'm not too worried that we can't do better with what's coming along.
>
> Is it worth making noise about olpc-powerd, lessons learned, desirable
> features?
>
> We are ahead of
sly available rocks and stones
held together with bits of chewing gum and string that we provided,
i'm not too worried that we can't do better with what's coming along.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing l
entered, it would be pretty
obvious what was happening.
paul
> And does clearing that search solve the issue?
>
> cheers
> Daniel
> _______
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org
voking arch_reset blindly without setting up identity
> map, but I didn't yet try doing this
> prior to the __olpc_ofw call so I'm just conjecturing...
>
> Thanks,
> A
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.la
> >
> > Changes and notes from os6:
> >
> > kernel:
> > - AVC hack to disable tap to click
> >
> > Activity changes:
> > -Browse-126
> > +Browse-127
> > ___
> > Devel mailing list
t; Thx
> >> Barry Vercoe
> >>
> >> Prof Emeritus MIT Media Lab
> >> http://web.media.mit.edu/~bv <http://web.media.mit.edu/%7Ebv>
> >>
> >> Dir of Education and Engineering, OLPC Australia
> >> ba...@laptop.
as "echo mem > /sys/power/state".
i guess it depends on who you think will be using this command.
paul
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
er, it doesn't show me the name screen.
> Mouse
> isn't frozen, but the blank white screen just sits there. Anyone else seeing
> this?
>
> ___
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.la
martin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Paul Fox wrote:
> > thanks for doing this. pushed?
>
> Now yes, had faild on transient network error. Sorry.
>
> > > - Did not enable CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_OLPC as it seems to be for ALPS.
> >
> >
martin --
thanks for doing this. pushed?
martin wrote:
>
> - Did not enable CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_OLPC as it seems to be for ALPS.
this means installing an ALPS base on a 1.75 won't work. i
think we want it enabled.
paul
=-----
paul fox, p...
f - working code first
> - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
east to work (or
> not).
>
> Absolutely no urgency.
>
> Cheers,
>
> KG
> part 2 text/plain 129
> _______
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.laptop.org
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
=-
...
>
> I didn't go with the rfkill extra in the end - wasn't quite as simple
> as I'd hoped. Needs a fresh look, which may even result in it being
> fixed elsewhere.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
=-
paul fox, p...@laptop.org
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
101 - 200 of 545 matches
Mail list logo
