Re: 13.1.0 build 29 for XO-4 released

2013-02-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/11/2013 08:59 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, Another XO-4 only build for 13.1.0: http://download.laptop.org/xo-4/os/candidate/13.1.0-29/ Changes are: - Improved power saving in graphics and other areas - Latest wake-on-WLAN developments - A potential fix for loss of mouse on boot (#121

Re: Renaming the Telescope activity to Scope

2012-11-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
Am 20.11.2012 um 06:23 schrieb Martin Langhoff : > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Chris Leonard > wrote: >> As I recall, this activity was already renamed once from xoscope after >> it became clear it was colliding in name space with an oscilloscpe >> activity. > > Renames are a pain in inf

Re: [Techteam] 13.1.0 development build 11 released

2012-11-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/11/2012 11:18 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: A new 13.1.0 development build is available. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/13.1.0 http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os11/ Changes: - The latest sugar component versions that were released on Thursday Actually, the package list [1] shows that Saturday's r

Re: [Testing] 13.1.0 development build 8 released

2012-10-26 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/26/2012 07:15 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: 2012/10/25 Daniel Drake : Hi, A new 13.1.0 development build is available: http://build.laptop.org/13.1.0/os8 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/13.1.0 - The latest Sugar release including various fixes, and some activity updates too - XO-4 kernel work fo

Re: [FATAL] No popup appears, to ask for secrets when connecting to Wifi-Network in Neighborhood-View

2012-10-09 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/09/2012 07:52 AM, Ajay Garg wrote: Seems that the same issue happens on XO-1 as well, as reported at http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2012-October/040173.html Likely fixed with http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2012-October/040187.html Will be in next build.

Re: [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

2012-03-29 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/29/2012 02:58 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Gary Martin wrote: On 26 Mar 2012, at 17:30, Gary Martin wrote: On 26 Mar 2012, at 16:24, Daniel Drake wrote: On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: The release is our first combined 12.1.0 / F

Re: [OLPC Engineering] [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

2012-03-26 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/25/2012 09:25 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote: On Mar 25, 2012 9:15 PM, "Simon Schampijer" wrote: On 03/25/2012 08:45 PM, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, On Sun, Mar 25 2012, Simon Schampijer wrote: Yeah, flashed now another 1.75 machine (1C2 4GB) and the first boot when I did not sit n

Re: [OLPC Engineering] [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

2012-03-25 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/25/2012 08:45 PM, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, On Sun, Mar 25 2012, Simon Schampijer wrote: Yeah, flashed now another 1.75 machine (1C2 4GB) and the first boot when I did not sit next to the machine it came up the same as my 1B1 with a non usable keyboard and trackpad. I rebooted and directly

Re: [OLPC Engineering] [Techteam] 12.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

2012-03-25 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/25/2012 07:59 PM, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, On Sun, Mar 25 2012, Simon Schampijer wrote: I have filed the Browse related tickets 11716, 11718 testing on the XO-1.5. My 1.75 does boot until the naming screen but I can not use the trackpad or the keyboard. This is a 1.75 1B1 with 4GB

Re: 12.1.0 devel build 5 released, for the XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

2012-03-25 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/24/2012 11:56 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: The "We are the Knights who say... NI." release. THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE The release is our first combined 12.1.0 / Fedora 17 release, such a small release but represents so much time by so many people in both OLPC and Fedora in the ARM side o

Re: [Techteam] 11.3.1 development build 31 for XO-1.75

2012-03-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/21/2012 05:09 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: On 03/21/2012 01:38 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: "Are we there yet?" This build brings fixes for two critical camera and Sugar crash bugs. Updatable via olpc-update -- try the cmdline below. Notes: - Building the first ARM RC in a

Re: [Techteam] 11.3.1 development build 31 for XO-1.75

2012-03-21 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/21/2012 01:38 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: "Are we there yet?" This build brings fixes for two critical camera and Sugar crash bugs. Updatable via olpc-update -- try the cmdline below. Notes: - Building the first ARM RC in a couple of hours, based on this build. - Building XO-1 and X

Re: 12.1.0 trac milestone organisation

2012-03-16 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/15/2012 05:15 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, In recent release cycles, the trac milestone on http://dev.laptop.org for each release has been disorganised and (for that reason) of limited use - many more tickets in the milestone that the team would have time to attack. In the 11.3.0 cycle I sa

ConsoleKit Removal

2012-03-02 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, Fedora is switching away from ConsoleKit and is using systemd instead [1]. Looks like olpc-utils needs to be updated to reflect that. We seem to open/close a ConsoleKit session in olpc-dm.c. Regards, Simon [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ckremoval [2] http://dev.laptop.org/

Re: [Techteam] The Fedora Fifteen Franken ARM hardfp build 1 for XO 1.75

2012-01-03 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/01/12 14:03, Peter Robinson wrote: The "This sonic transducer, it is I suppose some kind of audio-vibratory-physio-molecular transport device?" release. THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE AIMED AT CORE OS/HW DEVELOPERS This is a hard floating point Franken release for development and testing o

Re: Announcing OLPC OS 11.3.0 for XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75

2011-11-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/09/2011 11:47 PM, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: (1) In Record 93's preview image (both small and full-sized) the lowest rows of pixels constantly flickers between green and white. Please fill a ticket. Done. http://bugs.sugarlab

Re: Announcing the development of OLPC OS 11.3.1

2011-11-06 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/04/2011 09:45 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Martin, In 11.3.0 a few activities didn't include translations because of problems with packaging of the activities. Probably will be a good idea update these activities. I can prepare a list of recommended activities if you want. Gonzalo Are those

Re: Browse-129 PDF fork for 11.3.0

2011-10-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
Tested as well under 11.2.0 to determine if we regressed: - I can use the 'save to Journal' option and reveal them using the Read activity ([1] does show a strange title though 'Document:", the log do not show why), enhancement: would be nice to add here the download link in the description fiel

Re: Browse-129 PDF fork for 11.3.0

2011-10-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/05/2011 11:20 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: Thanks Daniel for working on this! A few notes from my testing: Thanks for testing on this. What's your opinion on the path forward? Pretty sure all of the noted issues will have

Re: [Localization] [ANNOUNCE] 0.94 schedule update: still on track

2011-09-14 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/13/2011 11:03 PM, Markus Schlager wrote: Hi Simon, Thanks Markus for the feedback, On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, Simon Schampijer wrote: There have been one interesting string change in the last week: there are two entries in the sugar.po that translate the same string ('Remove') but

Re: 11.3.0 build 4 released, for *XO-1.75*, XO-1.5 and XO-1

2011-09-11 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi,   we are seeing here quite a lot of hangs when using os4. Easily reproducible with Browse. Might have been introduced by the new video driver...?   Regards,    Simon   PS: there seem to be some 'redraw-corruptions' after mouse movement as well   Daniel Drake hat am 10. September 2011 um 01:18

[ANNOUNCE] 0.94 schedule update: still on track

2011-09-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, we are still on track in our 0.94 development cycle [1]. The release is three weeks away from now, we plan to release the 28th of September! We have been entering string freeze now, which means: "No string changes may be made without confirmation from the localization team and notificati

Gtk3 Hackfest, Praha 2011, news updates

2011-09-02 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, two major changes have recently occurred in Sugar's underlying technologies. Firstly, GTK+ 2 has been obsoleted by GTK+ 3, and GNOME is now based on GTK+ 3. Secondly, PyGTK, the underlying Python library that Sugar uses to call into GTK+, has been deprecated in favor of PyGObject Introspe

Re: Lost "activity failed to launch" smarts in Sugar launch splash

2011-08-31 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 08/31/2011 03:25 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: Hi Gonzalo, on os41, if you launch Maze, it fails to start (that's logged already)... and the launcher fails to register the failure, which I don't think has been discussed. shell.log says "

Help testing Sugar 0.93.x

2011-08-31 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, we have been landing the features targeted at 0.94 and are currently in the phase of fixing bugs related to those features and other changes introduced by recent code changes [1]. I have been starting to create notes about the Features and changes that have been made [2]. Those will evolv

Re: New F14-arm build os40 - Are we there yet? I'm hungry!

2011-08-27 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 08/27/2011 10:23 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: On 08/26/2011 07:02 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: The are we there yet? I'm hungry release Lots of change this release... again! So I'll just get to the raw details... Wonderful

Re: New F14-arm build os40 - Are we there yet? I'm hungry!

2011-08-27 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 08/26/2011 07:02 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: The are we there yet? I'm hungry release Lots of change this release... again! So I'll just get to the raw details... Wonderful! Congrats. Smoketest: fixed: #11161: Cant alt tab between activities fixed: #11174: Wlan&FW version no information und

Re: New F14-arm build os40 - Almost in sync with x86!

2011-08-23 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 08/23/2011 12:54 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: Hi Peter, thanks for the new build! First of all, it does boot fine. Thanks for confirmation, was racing out the door! On 08/23/2011 09:28 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: The please just

Re: New F14-arm build os40 - Almost in sync with x86!

2011-08-23 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi Peter, thanks for the new build! First of all, it does boot fine. On 08/23/2011 09:28 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: The please just exit the building already release! There's been quite a bit of churn since the last release so its likely possible I've missed some bits. I plan to cut another rel

Re: New F14-arm build os1 - Fedora mirror plus more!

2011-08-14 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 08/14/2011 03:14 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: The Peter's first release with Fedora Secondary Mirrors goodness plus much more release! Download from: http://build.laptop.org/~pbrobinson/f14-arm/os1/ Changes and notes from Martin's OS36: - All of sugar 0.92.4 release - abiword and pyabiword

Re: stop sharing an activity

2011-05-30 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/30/2011 07:36 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > > --- On Sun, 5/29/11, James Cameron wrote: > >> I don't know where that discussion might be, but the >> concept follows the >> maxim that once information is released there's no going >> back. >> > > Thanks for the detailed info. > For sure o

Re: 11.2.0 development build 19 released

2011-05-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/20/2011 10:15 AM, James Cameron wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:38:12AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> On 05/20/2011 12:29 AM, James Cameron wrote: >>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 06:54:54PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>>> Hmm, the representation of the m

Re: 11.2.0 development build 19 released

2011-05-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/20/2011 12:29 AM, James Cameron wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 06:54:54PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Hmm, the representation of the missing blocks and the 'Warning' at the >> end that not all blocks have been written put me off. It looked to me >> as

Re: 11.2.0 development build 19 released

2011-05-19 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/14/2011 01:46 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/11.2.0 > > http://build.laptop.org/11.2.0/os19 > > Notable changes: > XO-1.5 zd images are now sparse, meaning fs-update writes only to > certain parts of the disk and the flash process is much quicker Hmm, the representation

Re: [Sugar-devel] Anybody has a Go Go board?

2011-03-08 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/07/2011 04:39 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > -- if you can connect your sexy gogo board to your friendly linux > machine and type > > sudo lsusb -v> gogo-info.txt > > and email that txt file to me. > > thanks! > > > > m Done. Regards, Simon ___

Re: Require ".olpc" in rpms in ~/public_rpms/F14?

2011-02-28 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/28/2011 02:37 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > to ensure we keep track (and limit) of what non-Fedora rpms make it to > the builds, should the "rpm collection" step... ? > > - only grab rpms that say .olpc > - complain about rpms that don't... > > This would mean that in the pa

Re: Activity crashes when using libsugarize.so

2011-02-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/10/2011 11:55 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Martin Langhoff > wrote: >> Indeed. At this point, we think the crash comes not so much from >> libsugarize but from changing windows very quickly during startup. > > Wrtiteup of my diagnosis and patches at http://d

Re: Language support for 11.2.0

2011-02-09 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/06/2011 07:51 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 6 February 2011 12:36, Daniel Drake wrote: >> Does anyone know what the difference between "ht" and "ht_HT" is? >> I see that SKU24 does set the system locale to ht_HT. But does that >> mean we should include ht *and* ht_HT? Just ht_HT? Or ...? > >

Re: Language support for 11.2.0

2011-02-09 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/06/2011 07:36 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 4 February 2011 13:00, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> I request German for inclusion! At least I use it in my small >> 'deployment' of 5 machines :) I remember as well a class in Austria that >> used the builds, Chr

Re: Sugar on arm

2011-02-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/07/2011 11:41 AM, ismael schinca wrote: > Hello everyone. I'm trying to run Fedora 12 on a Beagleboard xm and running > sugar on it. > > However, when I try to install the sugar package via yum I get some > dependencies problem. Specifically, the xapian-bindings-python package is > missing (a

Re: F15 glibc again fails on AMD Geode LX

2011-02-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/04/2011 12:43 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:37 PM, John Gilmore wrote: >> FYI: Early Fedora 15 builds don't run on the Geode, again. This time, >> people seem to be on the issue, and may resolve it without much work >> from OLPC. But I think it would be worth spendin

Re: Language support for 11.2.0

2011-02-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 02/04/2011 07:16 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > Currently we are including the following languages and locales in > 11.2.0 official builds: > > en_US > es > ar > pt > pt_BR > fr > ht > mn > mr_IN > am_ET > km_KH > ne_NP > ur_PK > rw > ps > fa_AF > si > zh_CN > > We can extend that list if the

Re: [IAEP] !! in 10.1.3, setting "languages" property clears all activities

2011-01-31 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 01/30/2011 06:55 PM, si...@schampijer.de wrote: > Hi Timothy, > > so the issue you are seeing is twofold: > > a) the command you are using "sugar-control-panel -s language Kreyol/Haiti" > will > write a faulty locale. Can be seen in /home/olpc/.i18n That is why your > activity > icons are go

[ANNOUNCE] OLPC OS 10.1.3 final release

2011-01-16 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear olpc community, we are very pleased to announce build os860 as the final 10.1.3 release build for XO-1 and XO-1.5 laptops! This is an update to software release 10.1.2 that fixes important bugs and includes some new improvements (listed at the bottom of this mail). The release is based on

10.1.3 Release Candidate --- build os860 for XO-1 and XO-1.5 (Signed by OLPC)

2011-01-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
OLPC build 10.1.3 - 860 = The '¿Habla español?' build. =Builds= http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1/os860 http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1.5/os860 =General Information= This is the first release candidate in the 10.1.3 cycle. The final build is scheduled for the end

Re: Will 10.1.3 become 11.1.1?

2011-01-03 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 01/03/2011 05:19 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 00:31 -0800, Sameer Verma wrote: >> Given that 10.1.3 is still beta and we are now in 2011, will it become >> 11.1.1? > > No, because 10.1.3 is a point release in the 10.1 series. Similarly, > 8.2.1 was released in 2009. > > Danie

[Testing] New 10.1.3 build os359 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-12-16 Thread Simon Schampijer
OLPC build 10.1.3 - 359 = The 'stick all the fixes in olpc-utils' build. =Builds= http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1/os359 http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1.5/os359 =Description of changes in this build= ==build== * Add the content bundles to the XO-1 builds #10537 *

Re: 10.1.3 release date

2010-12-16 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/16/2010 07:18 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > We are working hard hard on it. It's a bit delayed because getting > rotate running well has been much more complex than expected -- Jon > Nettleton and James Cameron have just now -- 5 minutes ago -- found > the root cause of a glitch that was holdi

10.1.3 Testing page available

2010-12-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, we have a page [1] available where you are invited to gather your 10.1.3 testing results. We hope to find out more quickly possibly introduced regressions and get a sense of what works well. There are some tests where details about the hardware you used are of interest to us (e.g. Internet con

Re: USB to VGA

2010-12-10 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/09/2010 02:28 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Kevin Gordon wrote: >> Both 1.5's with both Startechs, with both monitors: If the monitor is >> already turned on, and already plugged into the USB port on the XO 1.5 >> before cold boot, the external monitor becomes

Re: New 10.1.3 build os357 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-12-09 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 12/09/2010 03:10 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> =Builds= >> http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1/os357 >> http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1.5/os357 > > Yay for another build. Getting closer. > > Testers

New 10.1.3 build os357 for XO-1 and XO-1.5 (was: New 10.1.3 build os355 for XO-1 and XO-1.5)

2010-12-09 Thread Simon Schampijer
OLPC build 10.1.3 - 357 = The 'no excuse' or read-my-homework-I-made-with-0.82-and-stored-on-my-usb-stick build. =Builds= http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1/os357 http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1.5/os357 =Description of changes in this build= ==sugar== * Convert J

New 10.1.3 build os355 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-12-09 Thread Simon Schampijer
OLPC build 10.1.3 - 357 = The 'no excuse' or read-my-homework-I-made-with-0.82-and-stored-on-my-usb-stick build. =Builds= http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1/os357 http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1.5/os357 =Description of changes in this build= ==sugar== * Convert J

Re: XO1 new builds

2010-11-28 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/27/2010 05:20 PM, Kevin Gordon wrote: > Resolved ...thanks for the quick response. I now have a 1.0 F14,a 1.0 os355, > a 1.5 F14 and a 1.5 355 to use for A-B testing. I may actually finish > testing the USB microscopes before noon! If your usb microscopes have been affected by http://dev.l

New 10.1.3 build os355 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-26 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, a new build in our 10.1.3 cycle is available! This fixes the activity updater where a regression was introduced due to switching to the new dotted activity scheme. Please test this thoroughly. If you have a USB-VGA converter you might want to use the XO to run a presentation. Martin has ma

New 10.1.3 build os354 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
OLPC build 10.1.3 - 354 = The wake up on multicast packages build. =Builds= http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1/os354 http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1.5/os354 =Description of changes in this build= ==olpc-powerd== * Better collaboration support when idle suspend is

Re: F14 os2 testing images available for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/22/2010 11:55 AM, James Cameron wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:03:28AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> I think we should add a Version field for F14 (e.g. 1.5/1.0 software >> Build F14). > > I disagree. The version field is for formal releases. The report

Re: F14 os2 testing images available for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/22/2010 10:59 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 22 November 2010 09:24, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> We have to do that at some point when we want to do a "serious" release. In >> any case, I think reporters should indicate a version. We should not abuse >>

Re: F14 os2 testing images available for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/22/2010 10:08 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 22 November 2010 08:03, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> I think we should add a Version field for F14 (e.g. 1.5/1.0 software Build >> F14). That field is set by the reporter of an issue. The milestone is set by >> the developme

Re: F14 os2 testing images available for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/21/2010 08:54 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > Simon has built new Fedora 14 images for XO-1 and XO-1.5, available here: > http://build.laptop.org/F14/os2/ > > These efforts are now official so we'll step towards making this into > a proper release. There are still some pretty obvious issues

Re: Upgrading a _very_ old OLPC

2010-11-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/17/2010 06:53 PM, Sameer Verma wrote: > Krishnan is local to SF. We'll help him get upgraded. > > Sameer Depending on the data you want to save, you might just save the content of home (Jounal) and reflash the machine with the current stable build (and then copy that stuff back in). Cheer

New 10.1.3 build os353 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-15 Thread Simon Schampijer
OLPC build 10.1.3 - 353 = The dotted activity version build. =Builds= http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1/os353 http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1.5/os353 =Description of changes in this build= ==General== We do have 8g builds now for the XO-1.5. ==sugar== * Adapt bun

New 10.1.3 build os352 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
OLPC build 10.1.3 - 352 = The "happy rotate" build. =Builds= http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1/os352 http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1.5/os352 =Description of changes in this build= =olpc-utils== * add config for screen rotation (part of #9350) * Enable SiSUSB suppo

Re: customizing olpc-os-builder image

2010-11-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/04/2010 06:36 AM, Mike Dawson wrote: > Well one choice as discussed before would be to use the modules I > already wrote that do exactly that: > > OS Builder Module: www.paiwastoon.af/otherdownloads/afcustomization.tar.gz > www.paiwastoon.af/otherdownloads/f11-xo1-g4.ini > > Unfortunately I d

Re: [Dextrose] New 10.1.3 build os351 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-03 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/04/2010 04:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 14:11 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Daniel Castelo >> wrote: >>> With this steps If I press the rotate button the screen changes, but the >>> behavior is not appropriate. >> >> Grab latest o

Re: New 10.1.3 build os351 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-11-03 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 11/03/2010 01:18 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Daniel Castelo > wrote: >> Can I install this 2 GB image in a XO with 8 GB for test purpose? > > Yes. And if you can put the SD card on a different machine you can use > resize2fs on it. > > > > m Yeah - I have only

New 10.1.3 build os351 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-10-28 Thread Simon Schampijer
3 (Mukul Gupta) * Cleanup temporary files on startup #10301 (Simon Schampijer) * restore sugar-launch by bundle id substring, fixes #9189 (James Cameron) * New go-home icon, needed by Browse #10364 (Gary C Martin) * Remove shared activity from the neighborhood view when no members left #10308 (S

Re: New 10.1.3 build os350 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-10-26 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/25/2010 01:48 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > > Is olpc-update of this build available? > > That requires me to tell updates.laptop.org about the new build > stream, which I'll do when I have more free time/return from Taipei. > > Thanks, Ok, thanks. I did not tested that obviously. Re

New 10.1.3 build os350 for XO-1 and XO-1.5

2010-10-25 Thread Simon Schampijer
OLPC build 10.1.3 - 350 = The "busy cursor" build. =Builds= http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1/os350 http://build.laptop.org/10.1.3/xo-1.5/os350 =Description of changes in this build= ==Sugar== * Journal: Show alert when error occurs while writing to external devices #

Re: Where should I put my public_rpms for 10.1.3 ?

2010-10-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/21/2010 02:35 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > > On 20.10.2010, at 23:44, Simon Schampijer wrote: > >> On 10/20/2010 07:10 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> as in the past, should it be ~/public_rpms/10.1.3 ? Will that work? >> &g

Re: Where should I put my public_rpms for 10.1.3 ?

2010-10-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/20/2010 07:10 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Hi Simon, > > as in the past, should it be ~/public_rpms/10.1.3 ? Will that work? Yes, using the public_rpms will work. They will end up under the name of dsd then [1]. Mind that you have to use ~martin/public_rpms and not ~martin/public_html/publ

Re: Test request time

2010-10-14 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/14/2010 11:20 AM, Tabitha Roder wrote: > Hello world > > It is late Thursday night here in NZ so it is the time of the week I start > looking for what we should download Friday and test in NZ on Saturday > morning. Are there any test requests from anyone out there? > > I am assuming we are s

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-10-13 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/13/2010 12:14 PM, James Cameron wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:47:07AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> On 10/13/2010 12:29 AM, James Cameron wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 05:27:27PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>>> For 0.84 we can do what powerd

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-10-13 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/13/2010 12:29 AM, James Cameron wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 05:27:27PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> For 0.84 we can do what powerd offers, creating a file based on the pid >> in /var/run/powerd-inhibit-suspend/ (those are removed by powerd when it >> goes into

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-10-12 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/29/2010 08:31 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 21:43, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> We have this code in many places, I found it in the Distance activity and >> bitfrost updater. >> May be is a good idea inhibit suspend when is displayed the neighborhood >> view also. >> Can we h

[ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.90 Final Release

2010-10-06 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear Sugar community, Sucrose 0.90 is the latest version of the Sugar learning platform: Sugar promotes collaborative learning through Sugar Activities that encourage critical thinking, the heart of a quality education. Designed from the ground up especially for children, Sugar offers an altern

Re: Testing 0.90 on an XO

2010-10-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 10/04/2010 05:22 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Hi, > > I have been doing 0.90-F14 builds for the XO-1 and XO-1.5. You can grab > the latest build from [1]. > > I provide these builds that people that do have XO-hardware can start > helping testing 0.90. So far, we did not

Testing 0.90 on an XO

2010-10-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, I have been doing 0.90-F14 builds for the XO-1 and XO-1.5. You can grab the latest build from [1]. I provide these builds that people that do have XO-hardware can start helping testing 0.90. So far, we did not have much testing yet. We just released 0.90.0 and want to do a bug fix release

Re: Empty list view

2010-09-29 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/29/2010 01:10 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 13:03, javed khan wrote: >> here is the log > > Seems to be an issue with localization: > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sugar/util.py in > timestamp_to_elapsed_string(timestamp=dbus.Double(1285751109.0, > variant_level=1),

Re: [Sugar-devel] Introduction

2010-09-28 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi Steven, On 09/28/2010 01:00 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:46, Steven Parrish wrote: >> Some of you may have already heard that I have accepted a position >> with ActivityCentral to be the project manager for Dextrose. It feels >> like I have come full circle as I starte

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-24 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/23/2010 03:55 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:56, Paul Fox wrote: >>> tomeu wrote: >>> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff >>> >wrote: >>> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Tomeu >>> Viz

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-24 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/23/2010 03:30 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:56, Paul Fox wrote: >> tomeu wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff >> >wrote: >> > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso >> wrote: >> > >> So the problem is that if you had to

Re: Updating with olpc-update command

2010-09-23 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/21/2010 04:16 PM, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > Dear all, I have two question > > 1) I am using virtual environment to booting up fedora-sugar. Can I use > olpc-update command for update purpose ? When I try the command, it give me > error that developer key is not present. > 2) Is this command

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

2010-09-11 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/02/2010 07:43 PM, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: >>> In Terminal, cursor movement keys don't work. [I also saw interference >>> to Terminal (white background) from dmesg? lines (black background), >>> after each boot -- but these would go away if I just restarted Sugar.] >> >> This could be X using

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

2010-09-11 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/11/2010 04:20 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote: >> The XO-1.5 build does not boot for me, I get the following after >> flashing the image: >> >> Boot device: /wlan Argumenst: >> Scan for: OLPCOFW not found >> Scan for: school-mesh-0 not found >> Scan for: school-mesh-1 not found >> Scan for: school-me

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

2010-09-11 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/01/2010 07:22 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, Hi Daniel, first of all - thanks for your excellent work! > After seeing the community help significantly with F11-on-XO > development, I'm wondering if we can do something similar for a future > release. So, I've taken the first few steps in get

Re: OS Builder: Missing dependency mtd-utils

2010-09-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/07/2010 01:54 PM, Esteban Bordon wrote: > In Dextrose page [1] we can find this information: > > - Install dependencies > > yum upgrade > yum install libtomcrypt-devel bitfrost make gcc mtd-utils > python-imgcreate zip unzip > > I don't know if os-builder used to build Dextrose have

Re: [Sugar-devel] Enhancing Sugar to support multiple users

2010-09-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/07/2010 01:33 AM, Hal Murray wrote: > > d...@laptop.org said: >> When we discussed this while I was in Peru, one requirement they identified >> is that the kid would log onto an XO one day and do some work, and then log >> onto another XO the following week and continue the same work. > >> As

Re: [Sugar-devel] Enhancing Sugar to support multiple users

2010-09-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/06/2010 03:40 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: >> On 5 September 2010 13:57, Christoph Derndorfer >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just created a new ticket (http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2292) to get >>> some discussions started on what c

Re: [Sugar-devel] Enhancing Sugar to support multiple users

2010-09-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 09/06/2010 03:05 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 5 September 2010 13:57, Christoph Derndorfer > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just created a new ticket (http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2292) to get >> some discussions started on what changes need to be made to Sugar to work >> well in an environment whe

OS Builder: Missing dependency mtd-utils

2010-09-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, I had to build a localized german image for my pilot [1] last night and gave the OS Builder [1] a go. It worked out really well. Thanks for sharing the tool! During the process mkfs.jffs2 could not be located. The package mtd-utils was missing. I think we should add it as a dependency. (T

[ANNOUNCE] 0.90 Schedule

2010-07-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, I have filled out the missing pieces in the 0.90 development cycle [1]. I want to highlight some important dates: * 16th August: Feature Freeze * 29th September: The final, new stable release * 27th October: Bug fix release The Sugar 0.89.x schedule is based on the GNOME 2.31.x developmen

Re: [Sugar-devel] Keep confusion -- round N+1

2010-06-24 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 06/23/2010 10:49 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: [...] > It probably needs to be complemented by an option in the Journal to > add a "duplicate this document", and Home View changes to make it > clearer/easier to open a new activity without reopening the last > document. We actually did a lot of wor

Re: [Sugar-devel] Keep confusion -- round N+1

2010-06-24 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 06/24/2010 01:07 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 23 June 2010 15:49, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> Continuing on the tradition of "Keep confusion, yet again" thread >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-April/023440.html >> >> I was yesterday in a conf call with the Perú team, who had

Re: multicast route missing on ad-hoc+mesh

2010-06-23 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 06/23/2010 03:59 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> Btw, the multicast route has been added to NM, there is an rpm in >> F11-testing. Would be nice if some people test it too, so it gets >> included in the stable branch

Re: multicast route missing on ad-hoc+mesh

2010-06-23 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 06/01/2010 03:32 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 1 June 2010 02:55, Sascha Silbe > wrote: >> Excerpts from James Cameron's message of Tue Jun 01 00:42:38 + 2010: >>> Yep, that's it. Sugar is entirely relying on the existence of this >>> multicast route, and it is not present on os240py. >>>

Re: multicast route missing on ad-hoc+mesh

2010-06-01 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 06/01/2010 03:32 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 1 June 2010 02:55, Sascha Silbe > wrote: >> Excerpts from James Cameron's message of Tue Jun 01 00:42:38 + 2010: >>> Yep, that's it. Sugar is entirely relying on the existence of this >>> multicast route, and it is not present on os240py. >>>

Re: [Sugar-devel] ANNOUNCE: Sugar 0.88 for the XO-1

2010-05-25 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/25/2010 08:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88 >> for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for deployments, >> although we're also a

"Sugar: Wireless scan is slow to happen after sleep with wireless off" - first test results

2010-04-29 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, I tested today if the Sugar reconnection to the wireless network is as fast as the one in GNOME. That for I used two XO 1.5, one running Sugar and one running GNOME, and connected them to the same AP. I suspended both machines by closing the lid. After I reopened the lid both machines con

Re: Alternative to Create a new wireless network

2010-04-26 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 04/26/2010 06:01 AM, James Cameron wrote: > What do you do with scan results that show an ad-hoc network is > available with the same name? Pick one: > > 1. show an access point icon for it (the current behaviour in os121), > > 2. show an ad-hoc mesh icon for it, with a badge showing that it

  1   2   3   >