Re: Can't find shared library libusb

2010-10-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 21:24, Emiliano Pastorino wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm trying to use libusb, but I'm getting this behaviour in python: > >>> from ctypes.util import find_library >>> find_library('usb') >>> > (returned None) What about "find_library('usb-1.0')"? It's probably good that y

Re: [Sugar-devel] Memory leak in Sugar -- how to dump Py data structures?

2010-10-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 22:01, Tim McNamara wrote: > On 8 October 2010 03:34, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> >> See http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10386 for details. The sugar-session >> process in 10.1.2 grows slowly... >> >> There's some form of leak somewhere. Maybe we are triggerin a real >> python l

Re: Empty list view

2010-09-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
from elapsed_units) % elapsed_units > to elapsed_units) Hi, I'm just forwarding this to the list to let people know that Javed has found a solution. Regards, Tomeu > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 13:03, javed khan wrote: >&g

Re: Empty list view

2010-09-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
est of the Sugar OLPC team are aware of the issue and have a fix coming, though not sure if for 0.82. Regards, Tomeu > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:44, javed khan wrote: >> > Hi All >> > >> >

Re: Empty list view

2010-09-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:44, javed khan wrote: > Hi All > > when i click on the list view i could not find any activity there. > the language setting is set to Pashto Afghanistan (LANG="ps_AF.utf8") > the sugar version is 0.82.1 > > any suggetion Can you attach ~/.sugar/default/logs/shell.log?

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 21:43, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > We have this code in many places, I found it in the Distance activity and > bitfrost updater. > May be is a good idea inhibit suspend when is displayed the neighborhood > view also. > Can we have a unique class like PowerManager or anything li

Re: [Sugar-devel] Introduction

2010-09-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:46, Steven Parrish wrote: > Some of you may have already heard that I have accepted a position > with ActivityCentral to be the project manager for Dextrose.  It feels > like I have come full circle as I started out as a volunteer > maintaining the "F11 for the XO-1" bui

Re: activity help

2010-09-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 06:45, javed khan wrote: > Hi Guys > > i have few questions > > 1. can we create a shortcut for a library bundle in the favorite view ? The support for content bundles has changed a lot in every version of Sugar and it also can have regressed as the consensus seem to be to

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:12, Simon Schampijer wrote: > On 09/23/2010 03:30 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:56, Paul Fox  wrote: >>> tomeu wrote: >>>   >  On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff >>>   >    wrote: >>

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:56, Paul Fox wrote: >> tomeu wrote: >>  > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff >>  > wrote: >>  > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso >> wrote:

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:56, Paul Fox wrote: > tomeu wrote: >  > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff >  > wrote: >  > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso > wrote: >  > >> So the problem is that if you had to resync all state f

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:56, Paul Fox wrote: > tomeu wrote: >  > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff >  > wrote: >  > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso > wrote: >  > >> So the problem is that if you had to resync all state f

Re: Sugar on Tablet - On Screen Keyboard

2010-09-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 06:56, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > Is anybody working on Onscreen Keyboard or related stuff on Sugar ? > also what is the current status and how I can contribute. > We got some success to bring Sugar on ARM tablets[1]. now we are > exploring more. need suggestion too Hi, Sa

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 23:38, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> So the problem is that if you had to resync all state for each machine >> every time they wake up, you would use lots of bandwidth with the > (...) >> Another

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 19:06, Richard A. Smith wrote: > On 09/16/2010 05:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> So the problem is that if you had to resync all state for each machine >> every time they wake up, you would use lots of bandwidth with the >> power consumption ass

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:05, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 18:50, Zarro Boogs per Child > wrote: >> #10363: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut >> ---+ >>    

Re: #10363 NORM 10.1.3: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut

2010-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 18:50, Zarro Boogs per Child wrote: > #10363: Auto-Suspend gets in the way when sharing over Salut > ---+ >           Reporter:  erikos           |       Owner:  erikos >               Type:  defect    

Re: Bad interaction between sleep timeouts and Salut?

2010-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 05:26, James Cameron wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:04:25PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> I am curious -- what is the frequency of "presence broadcasts" when >> Salut is used? Where is it set? > > Three minutes.  Perhaps KEEPALIVE_TIMEOUT in > gibber-r-multicast-cau

Re: question about bad cairo performance on the olpc xo

2010-09-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 07:49, Erik Blankinship wrote: > I need help understanding why I am getting very poor frame rates when I use > pycairo to move a large image around the screen on an olpc XO.  When I use > pycairo to draw a rectangle of the same size on an XO, I get great > performance!  This

Re: Initial F14 developers-only release for XO and XO-1.5

2010-09-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
This is awesome news, kudos to Daniel. On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 08:49, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > Hey Daniel, > > Yippee! I suspect the sugar starting issues is the same one we're > seeing in SoaS for F-14. Hmm, I had some trouble on mainstream F-14 booting both Sugar and GNOME (actually, even

Re: Default unlock key ring (Fedora 11 + Gnome 2.26.3 + Apps)

2010-08-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 23:08, Hernan Pachas wrote: > > Dear friends, > How I can unlock the default ring keys. > I need never ask the system keys, because End users are children. > It should be noted that the system runs on the XO laptop, the program > "OLPC." > Your help will be very important f

Re: git help needed for 2.6.34 kernel branch revival

2010-08-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:01, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: >> Thanks for the advice. This is effectively the "399 patches" approach >> I mentioned. > > Yes indeed. I couldn't tell if you knew about using format-patch and > am separately - > >> Fo

Re: strange behavior of 'rm'

2010-08-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 03:56, James Cameron wrote: > I'm mystified too.  But it doesn't happen when I try it on os851 on > XO-1.5 ... > > 1.  the file can be deleted by user olpc in Terminal and stays deleted > until Sugar restart, (an rm -f works, then an rm -f fails with "No such > file or dire

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2010/8/11 NoiseEHC : > >> We used to do that, the problem is that we don't control our platform >> as Google controls Android and you need to make sure that resources >> that need to be specific of each child process aren't shared (dbus and >> X connections, etc). >> >> I'm personally more interest

Re: cairo has now 16bit surfaces (was Fwd: rendering-cleanup)

2010-08-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 15:48, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Sat, 07-08-2010 a las 12:14 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió: >> El Sat, 07-08-2010 a las 11:25 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: >> > > I'd expect well-written code to call cairo_surface_create_similar() >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 15:47, Lucian Branescu wrote: > On 9 August 2010 14:44, NoiseEHC wrote: >> >>> Sugar has a similar mechanism. From the Low-level Activity API docs: >>> >>> org.laptop.Activity.SetActive(b: active) >>> Activate or passivate an activity. This is sent when switching activities

Re: OLPC 10.1.2 Release Candidate 1

2010-08-09 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 02:16, James Cameron wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:41:32AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: >> Wifi "disappearing" after switching back and forth from sugar to gnome. > > I've not tried to track down the original problem report that you are > referring to, but Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 18:11, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > in general, I think we are saying the same thing :-) My impression as well. > With one exception -- OOM happens because memory is allocated. > Sugar-shell cannot (and I say should not) try to arbitrage in there. > If we try to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 17:42, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> Can't we just _close it nicely_? >> >> When you are about to get into OOM? > > Early on so we avoid OOM for most cases. Right now our OOM use cases &

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 15:15, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> I tihnk I have been sloppy with my words, so let me clarify two things: >> >> - killing processes should be done only to avoid OOM (because >> currently the k

Re: Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 22:08, Tiago Marques wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >> >> El Sat, 07-08-2010 a las 18:14 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: >> >> > So we would have a periodic wakeup? The test would be the amo

Re: Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 19:33, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 19:31, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >> El Sat, 07-08-2010 a las 18:14 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: >> >>> So we would have a periodic wakeup? The test would be the amount of >>> free memory

Re: Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 19:31, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Sat, 07-08-2010 a las 18:14 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: > >> So we would have a periodic wakeup? The test would be the amount of >> free memory plus buffers and caches? > > A polled design is clearly inferior

Re: cairo has now 16bit surfaces (was Fwd: rendering-cleanup)

2010-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 18:14, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Sat, 07-08-2010 a las 11:25 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: >> > I'd expect well-written code to call cairo_surface_create_similar() >> > whenever possible, but there might be hot-spots in our software st

Re: MicroSD Card performance variance on XO-1.5

2010-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 18:11, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > [cc += sugar-devel, tch] > > El Sat, 07-08-2010 a las 11:27 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: > >> Btw, have read that some notifications about available memory have >> landed in cgroups in recent kernels. The Sug

Re: MicroSD Card performance variance on XO-1.5

2010-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 02:52, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Fri, 06-08-2010 a las 18:50 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: >> > I also think our vm.dirty_* settings are wrong and likely causing our >> > current fill-buffer-and-stutter behaviour. We are using the defaults >> &

Re: cairo has now 16bit surfaces (was Fwd: rendering-cleanup)

2010-08-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 02:20, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Tue, 03-08-2010 a las 16:26 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: >> This means that graphic operations would be considerably faster on the >> XO-1 because to date we are rendering to 24bit surfaces that the X >> server ha

Re: MicroSD Card performance variance on XO-1.5

2010-08-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 18:43, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Richard A. Smith wrote: >> Whats the qualifications on that?  I assume its raw RGB video? > > No, it's compressed vid + uncompressed audio to be stitched later. > > I have a confession to make: Many years ago

cairo has now 16bit surfaces (was Fwd: rendering-cleanup)

2010-08-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
This means that graphic operations would be considerably faster on the XO-1 because to date we are rendering to 24bit surfaces that the X server has to convert to 16bit every time. Regards, Tomeu -- Forwarded message -- From: Soeren Sandmann Date: Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 15:22 Subje

Re: [IAEP] Announce: OLPC software strategy.

2010-07-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 00:01, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > Now that the 10.1.1 release for XO-1.5 is out, it's a good time to > talk about OLPC's software strategy for the future.  We've got a few > announcements to make: > > XO-1: > = > > OLPC wasn't planning to make a Fedora 11 release of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] UI experiments: pop-up menus and hot corners

2010-07-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 01:39, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 20:06 +0100, Gary Martin wrote: > >> Activity start-up times are significantly better than they used to be, >> so no specific bug that I'm aware of, was just hopeful of any >> opportunities to further improve performance

Re: [Sugar-devel] UI experiments: pop-up menus and hot corners

2010-07-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:38, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On 6 Jul 2010, at 04:26, Gary Martin wrote: > >> Pre-rendering is tricky as both stroke/fill colour, and image size are >> variable. > > I think Benjamin had this more or less working at some point, I don't > remember why we didn't lan

Re: [Sugar-devel] UI experiments: pop-up menus and hot corners

2010-07-07 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 22:00, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: >> Activity start-up times are significantly better than they used to be, so no >> specific bug >> that I'm aware of, was just hopeful of any opportunities to further improve >> performance > > It's my impression that activity start-up times a

Re: [Sugar-devel] UI experiments: pop-up menus and hot corners

2010-07-06 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 05:26, Gary Martin wrote: > On 6 Jul 2010, at 03:33, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > >> On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 17:34 +0100, Gary Martin wrote: >> >>> Just showing the name under the pulsing icon might be a useful extra, >>> but ideally the launch time should be as short as possible

Re: NetworkManager time sync

2010-07-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 07/04/2010 12:59 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > Dan, > > we don't have any way to synchronize the clock on the XO... I'd rather > avoid running ntp all the time as it wastes 2MB of RSS. Does > NetworkManager provide a service to automatically call ntpdate when the > interface goes up? You mean a

Re: [Sugar-devel] MANIFEST pointlessness

2010-07-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 16:04, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 15:13 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> Would be good to have some way of tracking what needs to be solved >> before we can do the switch. Two questions off the top of my head are >> how first-t

Re: [Sugar-devel] MANIFEST pointlessness

2010-07-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 16:32, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Fri, 02-07-2010 a las 15:54 +1000, James Cameron escribió: > >> A fascinating meaning of the word MANIFEST that I had not previously >> encountered.  That sounds like an INVENTORY. >> >> What's the point of a file that is automatically gen

Re: [Sugar-devel] Restoring the journal from an 0.82 image

2010-07-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 01:50, Luis Michelena wrote: > I have reflashed my XO (bettie given by Erik Garrison after his layout from > olpc) with the 0.88 beta image(I have another, but has the Uruguayan ofw > keys), and I'm amazed by the improvements. > > But I'd would like to restore the 0.82 journ

Re: [Sugar-devel] Quickly for Sugar

2010-07-01 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 19:59, Sameer Verma wrote: > I was looking at Jono Bacon's article (cc'd) in the latest Linux > Journal (http://www.linuxjournal.com) and was wondering if anyone has > looked into Quickly in the Sugar context. Quickly essentially ties in > various tools to allow for an easi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Removing 'share' option from activites that don't know how to share

2010-06-25 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 22:23, Gary Martin wrote: > On 24 Jun 2010, at 16:20, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > > Talking with the Perú team a few days ago about F11/S0.84 (both on > xo-1.5 and xo-1) > > Teachers and testers were very confused with the 'share' option in > activities where sharing does n

Re: [IAEP] F11-0.88 os260py

2010-06-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 05:26, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > This is the an interim release of Sugar 0.88 + GNOME series for XO-1. > Please refer to this page for the current status and download > instructions: > >  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Sugar-0.88 > > > With this build, all the

Re: Anyone playing with Ubuntu on XO-1.5?

2010-06-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 19:17, David Farning wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 18:33, David Farning wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Martin Langhoff >>> wrote: >>>> [ Put aside the tin

Re: Anyone playing with Ubuntu on XO-1.5?

2010-06-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 18:33, David Farning wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Martin Langhoff > wrote: >> [ Put aside the tinfoil hats (there's no Ubuntu conspiracy) and the >> distro flames (no, I don't want to know which one is better). ] >> >> Curious minds want to know... > > At thi

Re: [IAEP] ANNOUNCE: F11-0.88 Alpha2 (os258py)

2010-06-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 20:03, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > This is the Alpha2 milestone of our Sugar 0.88 series for XO. > Please refer to this page for the current status and download > instructions: > >  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Sugar-0.88_Notes > > Surprise surprise! We now ha

Re: [Sugar-devel] Multitouch in Fedora

2010-06-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 22:18, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi, > > I know people were wondering about multitouch. In the last couple of > days there's a couple of posts regarding Multitouch in fedora for > those that are interested. > > http://www.j5live.com/2010/06/09/multitouch-working-in-fedora/ > >

Re: [Tecnologia] Adaptación de cargador múltiple, by CATS.

2010-06-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2010/6/3 Bernie Innocenti : > El Mon, 31-05-2010 a las 11:14 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió: > >> I would also like to know how this relates to the charger developed by >> Uruguay's LATU and by OLPC. > > I don't know anything about their design. > > This one i

Re: [Testing] os240py - collaboration over wireless

2010-05-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 15:35, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: >> I can only think of two reasons for sharing not working in mesh but >> presence yes: >> >> - network congestion, > > In my case, there appear to be no other radio signals present.  If there > is network congestion, the XOs are generating it

Re: [Testing] os240py - collaboration over wireless

2010-05-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 07:03, James Cameron wrote: > I've reproduced "no sharing" over mesh on os240py. > > Activity sharing works via access point. > > Activity sharing works via "Create new wireless network" aka ad-hoc. I can only think of two reasons for sharing not working in mesh but presen

Re: [Tecnologia] Adaptación de cargador múltiple, by CATS.

2010-05-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2010/5/30 Bernie Innocenti : > El Wed, 12-05-2010 a las 16:49 -0400, Fernando Luis González Arriola > escribió: >> Hoy, con el esfuerzo de todo el TEAM, pudimos lograr hacer (o mejor >> dicho adaptar) un mega cargador, que se puede utilizar tranquilamente >> hasta con 9 equipos a la vez (quizás más

Re: [Sugar-devel] ANNOUNCE: Sugar 0.88 for the XO-1

2010-05-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 23:12, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >> El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió: >> >>> Is F-11 still the base OS for this? >> >> Unfortunately, this build is still based on Fedora 11. >> >> Fedora 13

Re: compiz F11

2010-05-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 20:52, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 12:46 -0300, Esteban Arias escribió: >> It is posible install compiz on laptop xo to magnifier and zoom >> desktop? > > Unfortunately, Compiz won't run on the XO-1 because it requires OpenGL. > > For accessibility pu

Re: [Sugar-devel] New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 125 - control panel

2010-05-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 14:11, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > El Fri, 21-05-2010 a las 23:01 -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis escribió: >> Simple and quite effective :-) >> Changing MAX_COLUMNS to 4 in >> /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/jarabe/controlpanel/gui.py did the trick. >> And still has space for

Re: Educational XHTML Editor Educational Game Maker

2010-05-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 19:50, Mike Dawson wrote: > Dear David, > > Thanks for your email.  Will definitely try and put together an .xo > activity for the version of eXe learning as it is now - should work. > > As a tool for the teachers and publishing to the school server - > indeed would be nice

Re: The All-Singing, All-Dancing XCompMGR

2010-05-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 15:34, Jon Nettleton wrote: >>> We could reuse the work done in Sugar 0.86 when we moved to metacity >>> from matchbox. Or just use metacity which is also a compositing >>> windowm manager. >> >> Or mutter which is the replacement to metacity for gnome 3 so should >> be a re

Re: The All-Singing, All-Dancing XCompMGR

2010-05-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 22:35, Jon Nettleton wrote: >> I think our next steps should be to: >> >>  * quantify the memory difference (both total and per-window) against >>   not running xcompmgr.  We were already running with the composite X >>   extension on, so I think the increase may be small.

Re: Hulahop browser screen width XO1.0 vs XO1.5

2010-04-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
s per http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Modules#hulahop hulahop is unmaintained, any help is welcome. Regards, Tomeu > George > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 04:27, George Hunt wrote: >>

Re: Hulahop browser screen width XO1.0 vs XO1.5

2010-04-22 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 04:27, George Hunt wrote: > Hi again, > > My activity uses Hulahop Browser for its help system.  The default browser > on the XO`1.0 seems set up for 800x600.   The CSS width specs  on the > functioning HELP activity add up to 800 px wide and everything works out ok. > > Bu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flash activities?

2010-04-13 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:59, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote: > Hi Esteban > > Take a look at the eatboom activity, it's an sketch to develop > activities based on .swf files, thanks to  the work of tomeu and > wadeb. > > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4225 > > > i use it

[Server-devel] Fwd: [SoaS] wireless connection school server

2010-03-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
[Forwarding to the XS list] -- Forwarded message -- From: David Leeming Date: Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 23:02 Subject: [SoaS] wireless connection school server To: SoaS Not sure if this is an SOAS or XS question or both! I am trying out a mixed environment with XO-1s and SOAS.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal Backup/Restore UI

2010-03-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 14:26, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 10:14 +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >> > However, it looks like it would take a couple of months of effort to get >> >> I think you are overengineering this.

Re: [Sugar-devel] unable to share Activities on XO-1.5

2010-03-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:37, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > Out of cursiosity: > Has anyone done real and actual testing of collaboration on XO-1.5s with > the/a current operating system version? Particularly testing that goes > beyond 2 or 3 XO-1.5s... > I was certainly very surprised to he

Re: [Sugar-devel] Journal Backup/Restore UI

2010-03-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
I'm a bit confused, is the problem reliable full restore with limited local space or the DS having the xapian DB open while the copy happens? Or both? Thanks, Tomeu On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 00:51, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > In Paraguay, we started discussing the topic of improving backup and > re

Fwd: [Sur] XO para ciegos y disminuidos visuales.

2010-03-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi John, was wondering if you were already aware of this request from the field. Regards, Tomeu -- Forwarded message -- From: Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero Date: 2010/3/26 Subject: Re: [Sur] XO para ciegos y disminuidos visuales. To: "OLPC para usuarios, docentes, voluntarios y

Re: To Gnome or not to Gnome

2010-03-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 13:04, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 03:47 -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: >> > You mean the blacked out GTK buttons and corrupt graphics >> > in some web pages? We have a temporary workaround for these now! >> >> No, actually I was referring to an XO-

Re: Adobe Flash 10.1 + AIR 2.0 on the XO

2010-03-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 15:42, Gabriel Eirea wrote: > Hello, interesting thread. > >> FYI: One of our largest deployments and two other smaller deployments have >> received approval to ship Adobe Flash in their builds. > > In Uruguay, Ceibal started shipping Adobe Flash with their official > build

Re: Adobe Flash 10.1 + AIR 2.0 on the XO

2010-03-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 15:19, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 24.03.2010, at 14:12, Reuben K. Caron wrote: >> >> >> On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:44 AM, Chris Ball wrote: >>> >>> 2) it is nowhere near possible to properly edit Flash content in a GUI >>>  on an XO because the software to do so does not exis

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Children want Sugar 0.84, for the wrong reason

2010-03-22 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get >> a tight feedback & bugfix loop) when someone like you is there. > [...] >> Yes -- but we gotta remember tha

Re: [IAEP] Sugar Labs Accepted as GSoC 2010 Organisation

2010-03-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 21:39, Tim McNamara wrote: > Chris - > You must have known something! Sugar Labs is part of the fold. [1] > Thanks all for helping me along. Now the real fun starts :) Congratulations and good luck! Tomeu > Tim > @timClicks > > [1] http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/program

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem importing hulahop.webview() in sugar emulator

2010-02-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
blobs/master/python/__init__.py#line41 https://wiki.mozilla.org/XULRunner#User_Profiles  Kindly > give some pointers. > Regards, > VIJIT > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> 2010/2/23 vijit singh : >> > Hello Tomeu, >> > I tried install

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem importing hulahop.webview() in sugar emulator

2010-02-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
be a feasible approach? Is there any > other approach which you suggest would be better? Kindly give some pointers > on the issue. This is the approach that I would recommend. Please keep us posted! Regards, Tomeu > Regards, > VIJIT > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:29 AM, To

Re: [Sugar-devel] Test request: Overwhelm chat

2010-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:54, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Long time ago, we've seen Chat.xo get slower and slower as messages > pile up. It didn't seem to be a network issue, but a "draw it on the > screen" or perhaps on the scrollable canvas. > > Here is the original bug report. It was done with an

Re: [SoaS] Using SoaS Blueberry to emulate OLPC F11 builds

2010-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 15:15, Reuben K. Caron wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Reuben K. Caron >> wrote: >>> 2.2 GB >> >> Cool. >> >> BTW, I just reviewed the src for olpc-switch-desktop and I think that >> if you just >> >>  ln

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem importing hulahop.webview() in sugar emulator

2010-02-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
; > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 23:36, vijit singh >> wrote: >> > Hello everyone, >> > SocialCalc is based upon the use of hulahop.webview widget. While trying >> > to >> > run soci

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem importing hulahop.webview() in sugar emulator

2010-02-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 23:36, vijit singh wrote: > Hello everyone, > SocialCalc is based upon the use of hulahop.webview widget. While trying to > run socialcalc on sugar emulator running on Fedora and Ubuntu, error saying > "No module hulahop" was occurring. So, we tried installing hulahop on th

Re: [Sugar-devel] Serious screen distortion using firefox 3.5 and 3.6

2010-01-27 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
and OLPC's devel ml. I would expect you to find the same bug on SoaS-on-XO1. Regards, Tomeu > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:01, Bryan Berry wrote: >> > I have tested firefox 3.5 and 3.6 on the XO with Sugar versio

Re: [Sugar-devel] New release of F11 for the XO-1 - Build11

2010-01-14 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, just a clarification: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 21:41, Yuan Chao wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Stanley Sokolow > wrote: > >> 2GB SD card in my XO, and I have Firefox on it.   I installed the ePubReader >> plug-in for Firefox.   This runs nicely and allows you to view eBooks in >>

Re: Shutdown proces on F9 (8.2.x builds)... who kills X.org?

2010-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:46, Martin Langhoff wrote: > With the help of Mikus, a specific shutdown bug has been narrowed > down, and I think it's a race with the X.org server needing a little > bit longer to shut down cleanly. > > More details on the bug itself at http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/994

Re: [Sugar-devel] New release of F11 for the XO-1 - Build11

2010-01-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:50, Stanley Sokolow wrote: > My thoughts about Firefox.   Even if it uses more resources than Midori, > it's worth the extra bytes.   I am running Xubuntu (Teapot edition) from a > 2GB SD card in my XO, and I have Firefox on it.   I installed the ePubReader > plug-in for

Re: #9965 NORM Not Tri: calculate support for arabic numbers in the interface

2010-01-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 06:36, javed khan wrote: > thanks for the quick replay > i tired to register at http://bugs.sugarlabs.org but failed to some reason. > I will try some other time to register their and then i will create a > ticket. Hi Javed, there was a problem with logging into bugs.sugarl

Re: sugar equivalent of uname?

2010-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 15:52, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: >> the portable way is to use jarabe.config.version for >=0.84 >> and assume 0.82 if that's not present. > > When running on an XO, how does one access 'jarabe.config.version' ? > > It would be nice if the sugar version could be determined from

Re: Some testing notes for OS10 for the XO-1

2010-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi James, happy to know you want to work on this. See this thread: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2009-December/thread.html#26938 Regards, Tomeu On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 02:40, James Smith wrote: > All seems to work pretty well. except powermanagement. I'm running os10 > updated today

Re: sugar equivalent of uname?

2010-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 00:04, George Hunt wrote: > Thanks, > > the rpm solution works on at least builds 767, 802, and 1.5 FC11 backported > to XO1.0. > > I'l go with that . Good that's enough for you. For the sake of people who read the archives, the portable way is to use jarabe.config.version

Re: [IAEP] Need Live CD to take to Argentina

2009-12-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:52, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> You got some good replies already, but you may want to consider >> contacting Gustavo Ibarra or Gonzalo Odiard (cc'ed) who are pushing >> Sugar in Argentin

Re: [IAEP] Need Live CD to take to Argentina

2009-12-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 00:47, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > H All i... > > Did this ever get implemented? If so where do I find it? Are there any > special instructions I need to make and use the live CD? Can a usb stick be > used for file storage? > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Sugar_LiveCD > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Ticket 8104

2009-12-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 17:33, Cecilia Abalde wrote: > Hi, > I have a question about the patch in ticket 8104. > to which version of networkmanager was done? Hi Cecilia, I'm forwarding our email to the devel mailing list at OLPC because NetworkManager is a component that belongs to the distro, n

Re: XO-3 official

2009-12-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 14:57, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote: > Hi All. > > 8-ghz processor ?. I guess it's better to rely on the info here, if you need to: http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20091222005779&newsLang=en Regards, Tomeu > > R

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-23 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:42, James Cameron wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:42:54PM -0300, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: >> Is it cheating to change the screen depth? I change it to 24 bpp and now >> cheese and totem work. Changes to /etc/X11/xorg.conf: > > That's odd.  We changed the screen

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-21 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
09 at 20:13, crodas wrote: > Hi there, > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:06:41 +0000, Tomeu Vizoso > wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:00, John Gilmore wrote: >>>> #10 0xb67fae59 in gst_xvimagesink_xvimage_put (xvimagesink=0x8364160) >>>>     at xvimagesin

powerd or ohm?

2009-12-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, I think f11 for the XO 1.5 uses ohmd but from a recent message from Paul I think the images for the XO-1 are configured to use powerd or at least doesn't start ohmd by default. Steve, is there any plan on this? Thanks, Tomeu -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using

Re: possible progress on XO-1 camera issues

2009-12-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:00, John Gilmore wrote: >> #10 0xb67fae59 in gst_xvimagesink_xvimage_put (xvimagesink=0x8364160) >>     at xvimagesink.c:864 >>         src = {x = 134867456, y = 140758336, w = -1259457208, h = 1} >>         dst = {x = 137730309, y = 3, w = 0, h = 137691184} >>         r

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >