On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
> I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email
> (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some
> digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who
> else this may have hit, but thought it worth m
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
> > I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email
> > (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some
> > digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, s
pport-gang] [ANNOUNCE] Sugar Labs Licensing Referendum
> (non-binding) results
>
> On 11 July 2011 03:23, Gary Martin wrote:
> > Hi Luke,
> >
> > I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email
> > (subscribed to way too many Sugar related
Hi Luke,
On 11 Jul 2011, at 16:43, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
>> I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email
>> (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some
>> digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, so
On 11 July 2011 03:23, Gary Martin wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email
> (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging
> found it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have
> hit, but th
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 10:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
> > I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email
> > (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some
> > digging found it had been clobbered as junk email, s
Me too :(
And with a gmail account too.
Gonzalo
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email
> (subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging
> found it had been clobbered as ju
Hi Luke,
I was surprised as I had no recollection at all of the original email
(subscribed to way too many Sugar related lists), but after some digging found
it had been clobbered as junk email, so not sure who else this may have hit,
but thought it worth mentioning.
Regards,
--Gary
On 10 Jul
On 06/14/2011 05:42 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
> This is a vote to determine the suggested license for future releases
> of Sugar. This poll will run from right now until Wed Jun 29 2011 at
> midnight UTC-4.
Sorry for the late update; the reporting mechanism for our voting
software temporarily broke