Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-28 Thread Paul Fox
martin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Paul Fox wrote: > > - hitting "brightness down" one more time when at level 0 will > >switch to mono. users that use auto-repeat to get there probably > >won't see a difference. as discussed on this thread on friday (i think), this p

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-28 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Paul Fox wrote: >  - hitting "brightness down" one more time when at level 0 will >    switch to mono.  users that use auto-repeat to get there probably >    won't see a difference. ... > - sunlight-driven auto-turnoff will go all the way to 0, but won't >inv

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote: > > On 24.11.2011, at 17:23, Paul Fox wrote: > > > bert wrote: > >> > >> So I would rather not add that extra step "below 0". > > > > okay, i'm fine with that -- i was on the fence. but i think you and > > gary are saying two slightly different things. > > > > you're s

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 24.11.2011, at 17:23, Paul Fox wrote: > bert wrote: >> >> So I would rather not add that extra step "below 0". > > okay, i'm fine with that -- i was on the fence. but i think you and > gary are saying two slightly different things. > > you're saying that the manual keypresses shouldn't ha

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Fox
kevin wrote: > I too will test this weekend. Silly q: should I test both sugar and > gnome, or just sugar? by all means, try both. it should work on VT console screens, too. paul =- paul fox, p...@laptop.org ___ Devel mailing l

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Kevin Gordon
I too will test this weekend. Silly q: should I test both sugar and gnome, or just sugar? KG On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Paul Fox wrote: > bert wrote: > > > > On 24.11.2011, at 16:09, Paul Fox wrote: > > > > > bert wrote: > > >> Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the f

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote: > > On 24.11.2011, at 16:09, Paul Fox wrote: > > > bert wrote: > >> Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the > >> week. > So > >> I took the 1.75 outside. > >> > >> IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all. >

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 24.11.2011, at 16:09, Paul Fox wrote: > bert wrote: >> Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the week. >> So >> I took the 1.75 outside. >> >> IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all. >> Someone suggested turning it back on quick

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Gary Martin
Hi Paul, On 24 Nov 2011, at 15:09, Paul Fox wrote: > bert wrote: >> Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the week. >> So >> I took the 1.75 outside. >> >> IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all. >> Someone suggested turning it bac

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote: > Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the week. > So > I took the 1.75 outside. > > IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all. > Someone suggested turning it back on quicker, I tried that (replaced > brightness_ram

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the week. So I took the 1.75 outside. IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all. Someone suggested turning it back on quicker, I tried that (replaced brightness_ramp with set_brightness), but that w

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-23 Thread Paul Fox
fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > > Thanks Paul > > > > thanks for testing! > > > > > > > > The logic appears to be buggy, see #11487: XO-1.75 OS12 backlight > > > is off when you come back inside > > > > okay, more testing is needed. as you n

Re: Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-23 Thread forster
> fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > > Thanks Paul > > thanks for testing! > > > > > The logic appears to be buggy, see #11487: XO-1.75 OS12 backlight > > is off when you come back inside > > okay, more testing is needed. as you noted, it's quite hard to tell > when it's on and off. i'll s

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-23 Thread Paul Fox
fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > Thanks Paul thanks for testing! > > The logic appears to be buggy, see #11487: XO-1.75 OS12 backlight > is off when you come back inside okay, more testing is needed. as you noted, it's quite hard to tell when it's on and off. i'll see if i can come up wi

Re: Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-22 Thread forster
Thanks Paul The logic appears to be buggy, see #11487: XO-1.75 OS12 backlight is off when you come back inside As it stands, neither the monochrome nor colour modes are OK in full sunlight. The colour mode causes a significant loss of resolution for reading small black text and even more resol

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-22 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Hi folks -- I was one of the early commenters on this. And Paul gave > me a, ahem, strong recommendation. All caps. Neon lights, blinking: > >        TRY IT OUT ON AN XO-1.75 Do it with the 11.3.1/os13 I announced earlier. It has a new OFW

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-22 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2011/11/21 Paul Fox : > i wrote: >  > >  > please try os12, when available, and see how it feels. >  > > > i'm afraid the necessary firmware didn't make the deadline for os12, > so you'll need to either wait for os13, or q4c05 firmware, whichever > comes first. I think a UI for color-monochrome sh

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Paul Fox
i wrote: > > please try os12, when available, and see how it feels. > i'm afraid the necessary firmware didn't make the deadline for os12, so you'll need to either wait for os13, or q4c05 firmware, whichever comes first. paul =- paul fox, p...@laptop.org

Re: automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > And when *pgf* types in all caps, you *know* it's serious. :-) -- actually, he didn't go that far. But I lack his subtlety so I went for it guns ablazing. m --  martin.langh...@gmail.com  mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC  -

Re: automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Paul Fox
fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: > The shift from colour to monochrome is noticable and would be annoying if it > happened a lot, for example as clouds pass, trees and people move. > > If the hysterisis, the difference between cutin and cutout brightness is > large, > the change in mode wil

Re: automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Mon, Nov 21 2011, Martin Langhoff wrote: > Hi folks -- I was one of the early commenters on this. And Paul gave > me a, ahem, strong recommendation. All caps. Neon lights, blinking: > > TRY IT OUT ON AN XO-1.75 And when *pgf* types in all caps, you *know* it's serious. -- Chris B

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Paul Fox wrote: > i've already had some guarded negative feedback on both of these > new behaviors, so i'm looking for more of that, as well as positive > feedback to balance it out.  :-) Hi folks -- I was one of the early commenters on this. And Paul gave me a, a

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote: > On 21.11.2011, at 18:06, Paul Fox wrote: > > > bert wrote: > >> When you add the auto-turnoff, it should only toggle the backlight, > >> not the mono-color setting. I don't think that would be too > >> confusing, from a user's POV it just means when it's bright > >> outside,

automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread forster
The shift from colour to monochrome is noticable and would be annoying if it happened a lot, for example as clouds pass, trees and people move. If the hysterisis, the difference between cutin and cutout brightness is large, the change in mode will happen a lot less frequently and not be annoying

Re: Re: automatic backlight control [Devel Digest, Vol 69, Issue 47]

2011-11-21 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
What would be the energy waste if auto-dimming was going to 1 instead of 0? This could keep the current setting, user experience and the advantages of monochrome mode. ___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 21.11.2011, at 18:06, Paul Fox wrote: > bert wrote: >> On 21.11.2011, at 15:22, Paul Fox wrote: >> >>> it quickly became clear (to me, at least) that it would be confusing >>> if user-dimming behaved differently than auto-backlight-control, with >>> r

Re: automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Paul Fox
[ resending to cc: the lists ] dj wrote: > > Can the keyboard backlight control have an extra step at the end, > going trom "bright" to "dim" to "off/color" to "off/mono" ? > > Then the auto-backlight would be allowed to bring it dow

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote: > On 21.11.2011, at 15:22, Paul Fox wrote: > > > it quickly became clear (to me, at least) that it would be confusing > > if user-dimming behaved differently than auto-backlight-control, with > > respect to monochrome mode. whether or not it's con

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Paul Fox
kevin wrote: > > Not sure if I have gleaned all of what is desired here, but I will share my > experience. I have a Samsung N130, a Lenovo S10-2, and an Adam Notion Ink > all with Pixel Qi screens. Turning the backlight off and automatically > being in monochrome is a desired feature and ma

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Paul Fox
walter wrote: > > Paul, > > Unless the display design is different than it was in 2007, then there > is no way to decouple turning off the backlight and going into > monochrome. Also, turning on the backlight adds color back (although > the amount of color vs monochrome in the mix is a fun

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread C. Scott Ananian
Just to reinforce a few points which maybe might not be clear to people who haven't played with the new hardware: 1) the switch point is set that *you cannot tell when we turn the backlight off*. Ie, the threshold is so high that by the time we turn it off, you couldn't never have told whether th

Re: automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread DJ Delorie
Can the keyboard backlight control have an extra step at the end, going trom "bright" to "dim" to "off/color" to "off/mono" ? Then the auto-backlight would be allowed to bring it down to off/color, and the user could go the extra step to off/mono. (assu

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 21.11.2011, at 15:22, Paul Fox wrote: > it quickly became clear (to me, at least) that it would be confusing > if user-dimming behaved differently than auto-backlight-control, with > respect to monochrome mode. whether or not it's confusing to the > user, it's definitely

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Kevin Gordon
mode from color to monochrome. > switching to mono mode effectively raises the screen resolution, > giving crisper characters and lines. [1] to my knowledge, this is the > only way in which monochrome mode can be invoked. > > my auto-backlight code did this too, at first, but once b

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 21.11.2011, at 15:48, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 21.11.2011, at 15:29, Walter Bender wrote: > >> Paul, >> >> Unless the display design is different than it was in 2007, then there >> is no way to decouple turning off the backlight and going into >> monochrome. Also, turning on the backligh

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 21.11.2011, at 15:29, Walter Bender wrote: > Paul, > > Unless the display design is different than it was in 2007, then there > is no way to decouple turning off the backlight and going into > monochrome. Also, turning on the backlight adds color back (although > the amount of color vs monochr

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Walter Bender
mode from color to monochrome. > switching to mono mode effectively raises the screen resolution, > giving crisper characters and lines. [1]  to my knowledge, this is the > only way in which monochrome mode can be invoked. > > my auto-backlight code did this too, at first, but once b

automatic backlight control

2011-11-21 Thread Paul Fox
1] to my knowledge, this is the only way in which monochrome mode can be invoked. my auto-backlight code did this too, at first, but once backlight control starts happening without user input, this "auto-monochrome" feature is a bit annoying. it looks much better if turning off the backlight

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-29 Thread John Watlington
On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:11 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 06:10, John Watlington wrote: >> >> On Jan 24, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Watlington >>> wrote: What can I call from an activity (in python) to in

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-29 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 06:10, John Watlington wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Watlington >> wrote: >>> >>> What can I call from an activity (in python) to indicate that the >>> backlight >>> should be turned off ? >>>

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-26 Thread John Watlington
On Jan 24, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Watlington > wrote: >> >> What can I call from an activity (in python) to indicate that the >> backlight >> should be turned off ? >> >> I'm playing with a photoframe app, and want to have the abil

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread pgf
marco pesenti gritti wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, wrote: > > right -- there's only a python dependency in that when someone asks > > "how do i change the brightness", they're pointed to python code. :-) > > Well... Wad needed it for a python activity. And even if you need to

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread pgf
michael wrote: > David -- why quibble over ohm when you've got NM and HAL to worry about? > > Paul -- why are the /sys nodes only writable by root? discounting, possible denial-of-brightness attacks by malicious screen hackers, no particularly good reason that i know of. well, other than ensu

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread david
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Michael Stone wrote: > David -- why quibble over ohm when you've got NM and HAL to worry about? NM (network manager) I can (and frequently do) disable. HAL is starting to become more of a problem. very recently it was very easy to ignore it, the lasest X.org releases make i

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread Michael Stone
David -- why quibble over ohm when you've got NM and HAL to worry about? Paul -- why are the /sys nodes only writable by root? Michael On 1/24/09, da...@lang.hm wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:43 PM, wrote: >>> but if ohmd is going to b

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread david
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:43 PM, wrote: >> but if ohmd is going to be in the middle, then the published >> api for requesting those changes should be more transparent than >> requiring every application be in python and have knowledge of >> dbus

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread pgf
marco pesenti gritti wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, wrote: > > > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline/blobs/master/src/jarabe/m > odel/screen.py > > it looks like there's a missing assignment to _ohm_service (i.e., to > > save the connection so it doesn't ne

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:07 PM, wrote: > right -- there's only a python dependency in that when someone asks > "how do i change the brightness", they're pointed to python code. :-) Well... Wad needed it for a python activity. And even if you need to write it in another language, the example is

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread pgf
tomeu wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 15:50, Marco Pesenti Gritti > wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:43 PM, wrote: > >> but if ohmd is going to be in the middle, then the published > >> api for requesting those changes should be more transparent than > >> requiring every application b

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 15:50, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:43 PM, wrote: >> but if ohmd is going to be in the middle, then the published >> api for requesting those changes should be more transparent than >> requiring every application be in python and have knowledge

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:43 PM, wrote: > but if ohmd is going to be in the middle, then the published > api for requesting those changes should be more transparent than > requiring every application be in python and have knowledge of > dbus. There is no python dependency and I personally have n

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread pgf
marco pesenti gritti wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Watlington wrote: > > > > What can I call from an activity (in python) to indicate that the > > backlight > > should be turned off ? > > > > I'm playing with a photoframe app, and want to have the ability to > > deliberate

Re: Backlight control

2009-01-24 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Watlington wrote: > > What can I call from an activity (in python) to indicate that the > backlight > should be turned off ? > > I'm playing with a photoframe app, and want to have the ability to > deliberately > control the backlight level from the UI. See

Backlight control

2009-01-23 Thread John Watlington
What can I call from an activity (in python) to indicate that the backlight should be turned off ? I'm playing with a photoframe app, and want to have the ability to deliberately control the backlight level from the UI. Cheers, wad ___ Devel maili