On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 11:51 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> The dependency chain there looks suspect. i.e. it's odd that libgnome
>> is bringing in metacity...
>
> Yeah. It's because libgnome brings in fedora-gnome-theme which then
> (somewhere al
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 11:51 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> The dependency chain there looks suspect. i.e. it's odd that libgnome
> is bringing in metacity...
Yeah. It's because libgnome brings in fedora-gnome-theme which then
(somewhere along the way) brings in a metacity theme which then br
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently modified OLPC-3 xulrunner to remove dependencies on libgnome
> and gnomevfs2. Once Dennis has had a chance to review my work to remove
> libgnome deps from other packages too, a huge dependency chain
> (including
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 19:48 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Daniel,
> >
> > It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library
> > in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 13:44 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
>> Daniel,
>>
>> It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library
>> in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the
>> journal)
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 13:44 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library
> in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the
> journal). We didn't want the old gnomevfs library since that pulled in
> the old bonob
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library
> in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the
> journal). We didn't want the old gnomevfs library since that pulled i
Daniel,
It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library
in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the
journal). We didn't want the old gnomevfs library since that pulled in
the old bonobo horror as a dependency. I'm not familiar with libgnome,
and the
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> We will also need to enable pyxpcom in the fedora firefox for Browse to
> work.
This is actually the simpler issue to fix, aiui -- just caillon asking
some questions upstream to make sure it makes sense (i.e. not broken beta
software they're
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 12:43 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
> 3. These dependencies will be coming back someday in the upstream, when
> Mozilla makes these hard dependencies instead of soft dependencies.
Are you saying that, in future, it will not be possible to compile a
xulrunner without print
We will also need to enable pyxpcom in the fedora firefox for Browse to work.
Marco
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So today I had a meeting with Christopher Aillon, the maintainer of all
> things Mozilla in Fedora, and it helped greatly to shape
So today I had a meeting with Christopher Aillon, the maintainer of all
things Mozilla in Fedora, and it helped greatly to shape my understanding
of the issues around xulrunner for OLPC and/or Sugar and/or Fedora.
My proposed goal is to maintain a xulrunner package in Fedora that meets
the nee
12 matches
Mail list logo
