Re: How did the testing go on 8.2-757?

2008-09-05 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott, > > From Robert Myers: > > > S Page sent me this: > >> Browse 95 on 8.2-757 was working reasonably well for me. Today I > >> ran Software update and now Browse version 96 won't start: > >> AttributeError: 'modu

Re: How did the testing go on 8.2-757?

2008-09-04 Thread Bastien
"Martin Langhoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks for your feedback. As of today, please use 759, which was just >> published. (It hasn't been fully smoke tested yet so I'm not ready to >> send it out to the wide wor

Re: How did the testing go on 8.2-757?

2008-09-04 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your feedback. As of today, please use 759, which was just > published. (It hasn't been fully smoke tested yet so I'm not ready to > send it out to the wide world, but I'm pretty sure it's going to pass.) Good h

Browse 96 failures (Re: How did the testing go on 8.2-757?)

2008-09-04 Thread S Page
Robert Myers wrote: > Downloaded the g1g1 activity pack. I know that some stuff there is out > of date, but given what happened next I didn't get much further. > > Browse doesn't work (no hulahop?) so it was hard to do much without > running back and forth to a working computer. Browse 95 on 8.2

Re: How did the testing go on 8.2-757?

2008-09-04 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Bob/all, > Just awful. I only loaded 757 last night, backtracking from a > joyride. So my reactions are very preliminary and not well > documented. I initially had Q2e14, but upgraded to Q2e15. > Downloaded the g1g1 activity pack. I know that some stuff there is > out of date,

Re: How did the testing go on 8.2-757?

2008-09-04 Thread Michael Stone
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:32:33AM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote: >I'll work hard next Welly testing round (in about 24hs) to get logs >and steps-to-repro on those hard ones. Do let me know if you have a >better candidat than 757! Martin, Thanks for your feedback. As of today, please use 759, whic

Re: How did the testing go on 8.2-757?

2008-09-04 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How did the testing go on 8.2-757? In Wellington last Saturday it went pretty well. There are bugs - but it's down to the hard-to-repro-and-document bugs :-/ > Is this release more "solid and reliable&

How did the testing go on 8.2-757?

2008-09-04 Thread Robert Myers
Greg, > We're working on the next pre-release candidate image. Will alert on > that as soon as we know more. > > There will only be a few more before we call it done! > > How did the testing go on 8.2-757? > > Links to download instructions, testing and bug r

How did the testing go on 8.2-757?

2008-09-04 Thread Greg Smith
Hi All, We're working on the next pre-release candidate image. Will alert on that as soon as we know more. There will only be a few more before we call it done! How did the testing go on 8.2-757? Links to download instructions, testing and bug reporting conventions and a brief write