On 07/22/2012 04:29 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
As I said before, the problem needs an engineer if it is to be investigated any
further, and I'm not.
You are welcome to the battery.
Ok. Well then please send me the battery.
Richard Smith
One Laptop per Child
222 3rd St. STE 0234
Cambri
--- On Sun, 7/22/12, Richard A. Smith wrote:
> Actually I believe it is worth the trouble because there is
> never just a single problem that doesn't happen to another
> machine. If you have this failure then there are
> probably many more. Its just never been reported.
>
> I'm happy to keep wo
On 07/21/2012 12:53 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
I'm sorry but I did not run any bg-acr! commands except the one you
suggested. The only command that I run outside your suggestions is
bg-acr@ .bg-acr with no batman.fth/batman-start first, which
certainly can not account for the erratic beh
--- On Sat, 7/21/12, Richard A. Smith wrote:
>
> Yes and I'll continue to say it as long as you continue to
> do things
> that are invalid and will produce nonsensical results.
> I've told you a
> few times that when you run commands like bg-acr! that you
> are modifying
> important values outsi
On 07/21/2012 03:05 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
- ok bg-acr@ .bg-acr (Should print zero)
ACR: -0.42
Hmm... I was expecting zero. I'm traveling to Taiwan right now and
don't have 1.0 or 1.5 with me to check.
- Insert battery
- ok bg-acr@ .bg-acr
ACR: -0.84
.42mAh / 24 hours = 17.
--- On Thu, 7/19/12, Richard Smith wrote:
> >> - Boot the XO. Sugar or OFW either will work.
> >> - Run on battery and allow the battery to discharge
> until is
> >> says its < 90%
> >> - Connect power and let the battery charge to
> full.
> >> - Reboot XO and stop at OFW.
> >> - ok batman-start
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
wrote:
> At which point exactly the "- insert battery" step goes between "- Remove
> battery" and "- ok bg-acr@ .bg-acr" ?
Ooops. That's kind of important. Sorry. Updated list below. You
need to insert the battery after you do batman-s
--- On Wed, 7/18/12, Richard Smith wrote:
>
> - Start with the XO in a clean working condition. ie remove
> all power
> and battery.
> - Boot the XO. Sugar or OFW either will work.
> - Run on battery and allow the battery to discharge until is
> says its < 90%
> - Connect power and let the batt
> On an XO-1
> The reading is "-4610.42" (!?)
Its a 2's compliment number. Negative values are normal. But you need
more than 1 reading. A single reading of the ACR doesn't tell you
anything unless you reset it to a known value before you start.
> Reboot to Sugar and got "very little battery"
>
> 1) Connect XO 1 or 1.5 to external power.
> 2) Boot the machine and stop at the open firmware prompt
> 3) Allow battery to charge up up until full.
> 4) print out the ACR with:
> ok bg-acr@ .bg-acr
> 5) remove battery
> 6) record the printed ACR number somewhere
> 7) Note time of battery remova
On 07/04/2012 12:20 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
"0 bg-acr!" solved the problem of the erratic reading.
Logs look more reasonable now (though there is still a sudden jump from 87 to
96% during charging in one log.
Thats normal. There isn't any calibration of the capacity as the
capacity
>
> After that test, I run bat-recover once more I noticed several strange things.
Running bat-recover is unnecessary and for your battery basically
useless. Also bat-recover runs outside of normal battery processing
so your SoC values (the %) may be invalid until you do a full
discharge or charg
On 06/12/2012 12:26 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
OK Attached are the screenlogs from the serial output
screenlog.charging is yesterdays log whith half full to fully charged battery
2339275:LDACR Update request ACR:-19791 LDACR:-19792
2339471:GC_LDACR=-19792 SOC = 58
2470692:LDACR Update r
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:16:13AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
>
> >
> > You can reduce the chance of contact noise derailing the
> > transmission
> > by connecting the two laptops in a specific order:
> >
>
> or maybe adding ,n,8,1 in the command ?...
No, that will make no difference.
>
> You can reduce the chance of contact noise derailing the
> transmission
> by connecting the two laptops in a specific order:
>
or maybe adding ,n,8,1 in the command ?...
(I still think is a good idea to add it in the wiki. Even with the notion that
although not necessary may reduce unexpe
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:07:44PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> James wrote:
> > Could you please do another test, to verify that screen is not
> > configuring the serial port any differently with or without
> > ,n,8,1. You don't need to connect the two laptops together, just
> > use the
> Could you please do another test, to verify that screen is
> not
> configuring the serial port any differently with or without
> ,n,8,1.
> You don't need to connect the two laptops together, just use
> the one
> you use as the serial terminal. The test uses the stty
> program to
> display the s
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:15:48AM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> > > > ? Perhaps your comm settings are wrong??
> > > > 115200,n,8,1 is what they
> > > > should be set to.?
> > >
> > > That did the trick (thus my change in the wiki)
> >
> > I think it was coincidence.?? Please try witho
> From: "Richard A. Smith"
> To: devel@lists.laptop.org
> Subject: Re: XO battery/performance [Devel Digest, Vol 76,
> Issue 4]
> Message-ID: <4fd5e76c.3010...@laptop.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> On 06/10/2012 01:07 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > ? Perhaps your comm settings are wrong??
> > > 115200,n,8,1 is what they
> > > should be set to.?
> >
> > That did the trick (thus my change in the wiki)
>
> I think it was coincidence. Please try without it.
At least in my setting ie XO-1.75 embedded keyboard model with the "problem"
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:17:06PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
>
>
> > ? Perhaps your comm settings are wrong??
> > 115200,n,8,1 is what they
> > should be set to.?
>
> That did the trick (thus my change in the wiki)
I think it was coincidence. Please try without it.
--
James Camer
> Perhaps your comm settings are wrong?
> 115200,n,8,1 is what they
> should be set to.
That did the trick (thus my change in the wiki)
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
22 matches
Mail list logo
