Hi Munro,
This isn't an ordinary laptop, and some of our deployment areas have very
expensive external DC power; from solar panels, cows, or a grid that
needs maintenance. When we make a million laptops suspend like that
even though they are on external power, we save megawatts.
An ordinary lapt
On 14 Dec 2009, at 19:54, Alastair Munro wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
> I checked a couple of the laptops after seeing your email about the
> suspending, the wifi disappearing was after a suspend. I was thinking of
> suspend in the terms of a normal laptop where suspending effectively turns
> off th
Hi Cameron,
I checked a couple of the laptops after seeing your email about the
suspending, the wifi disappearing was after a suspend. I was thinking of
suspend in the terms of a normal laptop where suspending effectively turns
off the computer and saves state to the hard disk. I find it odd that
G'day Alastair,
Thanks for responding. I'd like to drill down further into the facts
just to make sure we're not missing anything.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:19:19AM +1300, Alastair Munro wrote:
> We did not disable suspend before testing, all these observations were
> made on a fresh boot while
We did not disable suspend before testing, all these observations were made
on a fresh boot while plugged into AC power with no suspending. The wireless
just didn't seem to activate at all. When checking 'ifconfig -a' the only
device shown was the local loopback device 'lo'.
-Alastair
On Sat, Dec
#9865 illustrates the danger in telling all of our testers
to disable automatic suspend/resume. I would prefer
that testers leave suspend/resume enabled, and give
up their wireless.
Suspend/resume has seen very little testing!
Cheers,
wad
On Dec 11, 2009, at 8:11 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> O
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 01:40:04PM +1300, Tabitha Roder wrote:
> On all XO 1.5s we updated to OS54 wifi does not work (except on 1 of 5
> machines showed wireless connections for about 20 seconds then gone)
> although we now realise there is OS56 so maybe we need to just update
> again.
You probab
Tabitha Roder wrote:
>
> Updated 5 XO 1.5 machines and 4 XO 1.0 machines.
> On XO 1.5s the open firmware help is unhelpful. The new fs-update
> command for reflashing the XO is not described in the help and the old
> flash-nand command which no longer works is listed.
>
Thanks, I entered this
Testing summary - 12 December 2009 Wellington, NZ
Who: Tabitha, Alastair, Grant
Updated 5 XO 1.5 machines and 4 XO 1.0 machines.
On XO 1.5s the open firmware help is unhelpful. The new fs-update command
for reflashing the XO is not described in the help and the old flash-nand
command which no