Re: [OMPI devel] 1.3 Release schedule and contents

Pasha, Thanks for the info. I updated the milestone page. Thanks, george. On Feb 21, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Pavel Shamis (Pasha) wrote: Brad, APM code was committed to trunk. So you may mark it as done. Thanks, Pasha. Brad Benton wrote: All: The latest scrub of the 1.3 release schedule

Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready?

Sure. -Original Message- From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 6:58 PM To: Open MPI Developers Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready? Sounds perfect. How about this -- since your and my changes

Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready?

Sounds perfect. How about this -- since your and my changes are inter-dependent, can you send me a patch for the paffinity change? I'll apply it at the same time that I apply the new PLPA (later today). Thanks! On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:39 AM, Sharon Melamed wrote: Yes, I think we should

Re: [OMPI devel] rch-step2 branch errors

I don't think I run into any problem building either rhc-step2b and tmp-public/rank_file yesterday or today. But I am building with Sun Studio 12 on Solaris 10 SPARC though. Tim Prins wrote: I have just made a change in r17540 which may fix your problem. If not, please send the requested

Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready?

Yes, I think we should change paffinity.h and paffinity_solaris_module.c and paffinity_windows_module.c . I added those API's some time ago based on the plpa API's. Now, the plpa API has changed and no one uses those API's. (Except me and in the future, maybe Sun guys) So I don't see why not

Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready?

On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:13 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: Right, but the plpa_solaris_module.c file will need to be updated with the new function signatures so that it will still compile (i.e., if you're going to be changing the function signatures in paffinity.h). Hah -- I meant

Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready?

On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:01 AM, Sharon Melamed wrote: 1. Yes, I need both parameters when querying socket and cores. 2. I don't think that sun will concern if we will change the get_processor/socket/core_info because as Pak Lui from Sun said in one of his early emails "I am guessing it will not

Re: [OMPI devel] rch-step2 branch errors

Interesting - it is building for me, but Tim P has noted a couple of bugs (I haven't tested it in the last few days). I'll take a look... On 2/21/08 8:02 AM, "Lenny Verkhovsky" wrote: > Hi, > > In order to make a /tmp/rank_file branch with new RMAPS component I need >

[OMPI devel] rch-step2 branch errors

Hi, In order to make a /tmp/rank_file branch with new RMAPS component I need /tmp/rhc-step2b branch to be based on. I tried to download and compile it, but it failed. (missing many defines, h files and new directories e.t.c) gcc -O3 -DNDEBUG -finline-functions -fno-strict-aliasing -pthread -o

Re: [OMPI devel] PLPA ready?

Jeff, 1. Yes, I need both parameters when querying socket and cores. 2. I don't think that sun will concern if we will change the get_processor/socket/core_info because as Pak Lui from Sun said in one of his early emails "I am guessing it will not messing us up because these are the functions

Re: [OMPI devel] 1.3 Release schedule and contents

Brad, APM code was committed to trunk. So you may mark it as done. Thanks, Pasha. Brad Benton wrote: All: The latest scrub of the 1.3 release schedule and contents is ready for review and comment. Please use the following links: 1.3 milestones:

Re: [OMPI devel] RDMA pipeline

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 04:08:46PM -0500, George Bosilca wrote: > So I tracked this issue and it seems that the new behavior was > introduced one year ago by the commit 12433. Starting from this commit, Except that the log message of this commit says: Fix regression from v1.1. 1) make