We just tested it and it worked for us. Looks good. Thanks !
Rolf
Brian Barrett wrote:
I believe the problem is fixed with r20776 (and r20777), at least for
the test case Jeff had in the bug tracker. Can someone else give
it a whirl and see if I'm just getting lucky?
Thanks,
Brian
Awesome; many thanks for carrying the baton over the finish line, Josh!
On Mar 13, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
The application has been submitted. We find out on March 18 (3 pm) if
we have been accepted. Link to timeline below:
You have to "module load osl merurial" in your shell startup files
somewhere for hg to work on milliways.
On Mar 13, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Ethan Mallove wrote:
On Fri, Mar/13/2009 02:19:24PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
> I just pushed a final draft to the repository. I'll probably plan on
> submitting
The application has been submitted. We find out on March 18 (3 pm) if
we have been accepted. Link to timeline below:
http://socghop.appspot.com/document/show/program/google/gsoc2009/
timeline
Cheers,
Josh
On Mar 13, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Josh Hursey wrote:
I just pushed a final draft to the
I finished a first pass at cleaning up the Ideas page on the Wiki.
All of the ideas were preserved, just some rewording and formatting.
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/mtt/wiki/MttNewFeaturesIdeas
If you get a chance, read through this and make sure the text sounds
ok (feel free to clean the
I would like to add my 0.02 to this discussion.
The "code stability" it is not something that should stop project from
development and progress. During MPI Project live we already saw some
pretty critical changes (pml/btl/etc...) and as result after all we have
more stable and more optimized MPI.
To let everyone else know...
We unfortunately ran into a blocker bug today, literally right before
1.3.1 went out the door. Doh!
https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/1832
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems