[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.0a1r1406)

Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.0a1r1406 Start time: Mon Nov 30 21:01:01 EST 2009 End time: Mon Nov 30 21:02:55 EST 2009 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [OMPI devel] Deadlocks with new (routed) orted launch algorithm

On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Sylvain Jeaugey wrote: About my previous e-mail, I was wrong about all components having a 0 priority : it was based on default parameters reported by "ompi_info -a | grep routed". It seems that the truth is not always in ompi_info ... ompi_info *does*

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

- "Samuel Thibault" wrote: > What do you mean by "module support"? http://modules.sourceforge.net/ They make managing multiple software installations on clusters much much easier.. -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Michael Raymond, le Mon 30 Nov 2009 09:56:23 -0600, a écrit : > Software modules, eg on SuSE see the Modules RPM. The way that a lot > of software installations used to be managed was to throw them all under > /usr in the standard directories. Ah, ok, right. (module is so generic a name,

Re: [OMPI devel] Deadlocks with new (routed) orted launch algorithm

Ok. Maybe I should try on a RHEL5 then. About the compilers, I've tried with both gcc and intel and it doesn't seem to make a difference. On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Ralph Castain wrote: Interesting. The only difference I see is the FC11 - I haven't seen anyone running on that OS yet. I wonder if

Re: [OMPI devel] Deadlocks with new (routed) orted launch algorithm

Interesting. The only difference I see is the FC11 - I haven't seen anyone running on that OS yet. I wonder if that is the source of the trouble? Do we know that our code works on that one? I know we had problems in the past with FC9, for example, that required fixes. Also, what compiler are

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Software modules, eg on SuSE see the Modules RPM. The way that a lot of software installations used to be managed was to throw them all under /usr in the standard directories. This kept library paths and include in default places but breaks down when you have multiple installations of a

Re: [OMPI devel] Deadlocks with new (routed) orted launch algorithm

Hi Ralph, I'm also puzzled :-) Here is what I did today : * download the latest nightly build (openmpi-1.7a1r22241) * untar it * patch it with my "ORTE_RELAY_DELAY" patch * build it directly on the cluster (running FC11) with : ./configure

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

Michael Raymond, le Mon 30 Nov 2009 09:23:02 -0600, a écrit : > At the moment I'm thinking SLES11 (and RHEL6) RPMs of 0.9.3 / TOT > installed in /opt[/sgi]/hwloc. I'd also add module support. What do you mean by "module support"? Samuel