[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.0a1r1882)

2010-03-30 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.0a1r1882 Start time: Tue Mar 30 21:01:05 EDT 2010 End time: Tue Mar 30 21:03:11 EDT 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC 1/1: improvements to the "notifier" framework and ORTE WDC

2010-03-30 Thread Abhishek Kulkarni
On Mar 29, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: On Mar 29, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Abhishek Kulkarni wrote: On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Sylvain Jeaugey wrote: Hi Ralph, For now, I think that yes, this is a unique identifier. However, in my opinion, this could be improved in the future replacing

Re: [hwloc-devel] Strange difference

2010-03-30 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
True (processor can be ambiguous), but remember that we're talking about sockets, cores, and hardware threads. -jms Sent from my PDA. No type good. - Original Message - From: hwloc-devel-boun...@open-mpi.org To: hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org

Re: [hwloc-devel] Strange difference

2010-03-30 Thread Brice Goglin
Chris Samuel wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:15:50 am Jeff Squyres wrote: > > >> At least on my machine, the output width is still far less than 80 >> characters, so the full word should be no problem. But I don't know if >> there are other strange topologies out there that would take up more

Re: [hwloc-devel] Strange difference

2010-03-30 Thread Chris Samuel
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:23:52 am Jeff Squyres wrote: > I think that we need to differentiate between the different meanings of > "CPU" here -- CPU could also mean "socket", for example... ...so can processor. :-(Really the only unambiguous way I've come across (so far) describing things is

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC 1/1: improvements to the "notifier" framework and ORTE WDC

2010-03-30 Thread Sylvain Jeaugey
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Abhishek Kulkarni wrote: #define ORTE_NOTIFIER_DEFINE_EVENT(eventstr, associated_text) { static int event = -1; if (OPAL_UNLIKELY(event == -1) { event = opal_sos_create_new_event(eventstr, associated_text); } .. }

[OMPI devel] Some questions about checkpoint/restart (8)

2010-03-30 Thread Takayuki Seki
8th question is as follows: (8) The result of communication which uses derived datatypes which was constructed using MPI_Type_vector,MPI_Type_indexed is incorrect after taking checkpoint. Framework : datatype Component : datatype The source file : ompi/datatype/dt_copy.c

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC 1/1: improvements to the "notifier" framework and ORTE WDC

2010-03-30 Thread Nadia Derbey
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 09:37 -0600, Ralph Castain wrote: > Hi Abhishek > > > I'm confused by the WDC wiki page, specifically the part about the new > ORTE_NOTIFIER_DEFINE_EVENT macro. Are you saying that I (as the > developer) have to provide this macro with a unique notifier id? Hi Ralph,