On Jun 22, 2012, at 11:26 PM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
>> 4. The behavior of --with[out]-verbs is as was described in a prior mail:
>> - if --with-verbs is specified, all 3 verbs-based components must succeed
>> - if --without-verbs is specified, all 4 verbs-based components will not
>> build
>>
On 6/22/2012 3:36 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
To update everyone: there was much more discussion about this off-list. :-)
We decided to do the following:
1. The name --with-verbs seems better than --with-openfabrics, if for no other reason
than the name "openfabrics" encompasses more things
