On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> Thanks. We're just going to change the test in the usnic BTL to be
> explicit about only building on 64 bit Linux.
>
Last night's trunk did NOT try to build btl:usnic on Solaris.
So, this issue looks to be resolved in trunk.
-Pa
On Jan 9, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> I actually noted this in the unofficial tarball you rolled for me in December:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> [...]
> I'm not sure why one is trying to build the usnic btl on Solaris at all.
> Perhaps just because the
Jeff,
I actually noted this in the unofficial tarball you rolled for me in
December:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Paul Hargrove wrote:
[...]
> I'm not sure why one is trying to build the usnic btl on Solaris at all.
> Perhaps just because the OFED stack is present?
>
[...]
I assumed your la
Paul --
Could you send the configure stdout and config.log for your 32 bit build on
Solaris?
We have a test in the usnic BTL that is supposed to ensure that it only builds
on Linux, but given some of the output you've sent, it looks like it is also
building on Solaris... (which means our confi
