Initialization via Modex
In r26987.
Thanks everyone,
Sam
From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] on behalf of
Gutierrez, Samuel K [sam...@lanl.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:34 AM
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: sm BTL
In r26987.
Thanks everyone,
Sam
From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] on behalf of
Gutierrez, Samuel K [sam...@lanl.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 8:34 AM
To: Open MPI Developers
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: sm BTL Initialization
This may be useful.
Attached is a patch tarball with the updates - may make quick reviews easier.
Thanks,
Sam
On Aug 6, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Gutierrez, Samuel K wrote:
> Thanks, Jeff.
>
> FWIW, I just finished testing with knem support enabled. Looks good.
>
> Sam
>
> On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:21 PM
Thanks, Jeff.
FWIW, I just finished testing with knem support enabled. Looks good.
Sam
On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> I've run this hg tree with the intel, IBM, and IMB suites on a Romley server
> with 20 cores for NP values of 2,3,4,...,19,20. The only failures were the
>
I've run this hg tree with the intel, IBM, and IMB suites on a Romley server
with 20 cores for NP values of 2,3,4,...,19,20. The only failures were the IBM
spawn tests (which are expected, because I ran with "--mca btl sm,self").
So -- +1 on this from me (disclaimer: I haven't looked at the cod
WHAT:
The majority of the code required to get away from explicit RML usage during
shared memory initialization is complete. With this update, the sm BTL and sm
mpool modex around the information required for setup.
I've completed some initial testing and everything seems to be working
properly,
