node
>>>> in another cluster, (e.g., via accept/connect), the
clustername/NID
>>>> pair
>>>> is unique for ALPS as a hostname on a cluster node is unique
between
>>>> clusters. If you do a gethostname() on a normal cluster node,
you are
>
NID,PID
>>>>> >>>> pairs at the portals level. Thus, these are unique only within a
>>>>> >>>> cluster. In point of fact, I could rewrite all of the ALPS support
to
>>>>> >>>> identify the nodes by "cluster_id".NID. It would be a
ther cluster nodes.
--
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Castain [mailto:r...@lanl.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:33 PM
To: Open MPI Developers
Cc: Matney Sr, Kenneth D.
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r19600
The issue isn't with adding a string. The q
-
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Castain [mailto:r...@lanl.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:33 PM
To: Open MPI Developers
Cc: Matney Sr, Kenneth D.
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r19600
The issue isn't with adding a string. The question is whether or not
ginal Message-
From: Ralph Castain [mailto:r...@lanl.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:33 PM
To: Open MPI Developers
Cc: Matney Sr, Kenneth D.
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r19600
The issue isn't with adding a string. The question is whether or not
OMPI is to support on
Original Message-
From: Ralph Castain [mailto:r...@lanl.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:33 PM
To: Open MPI Developers
Cc: Matney Sr, Kenneth D.
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r19600
The issue isn't with adding a string. The question is whether or not
OMPI is
Original Message-
From: Ralph Castain [mailto:r...@lanl.gov]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:33 PM
To: Open MPI Developers
Cc: Matney Sr, Kenneth D.
Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r19600
The issue isn't with adding a string. The question is whether or not
OMPI
The issue isn't with adding a string. The question is whether or not
OMPI is to support one job running across multiple clusters. We made a
conscious decision (after lengthy discussions on OMPI core and ORTE
mailing lists, plus several telecons) to not do so - we require that
the job execut
What Ken put in is what is needed for the limited multi-cluster capabilities
we need, just one additional string. I don't think there is a need for any
discussion of such a small change.
Rich
On 9/22/08 1:32 PM, "Ralph Castain" wrote:
> We really should discuss that as a group first - there i
We really should discuss that as a group first - there is quite a bit
of code required to actually support multi-clusters that has been
removed.
Our operational model that was agreed to quite a while ago is that
mpirun can -only- extend over a single "cell". You can connect/accept
multipl
This check in was in error - I had not realized that the checkout was from
the 1.3 branch, so we will fix this, and put these into the trunk (1.4). We
are going to bring in some limited multi-cluster support - limited is the
operative word.
Rich
On 9/22/08 12:50 PM, "Jeff Squyres" wrote:
> I
I notice that Ken Matney (the committer) is not on the devel list; I
added him explicitly to the CC line.
Ken: please see below.
On Sep 22, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
Whoa! We made a decision NOT to support multi-cluster apps in OMPI
over a year ago!
Please remove this from
Whoa! We made a decision NOT to support multi-cluster apps in OMPI
over a year ago!
Please remove this from 1.3 - we should discuss if/when this would
even be allowed in the trunk.
Thanks
Ralph
On Sep 22, 2008, at 10:35 AM, mat...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
Author: matney
Date: 2008-09-22 12:35:5
13 matches
Mail list logo
