Re: [OMPI devel] new btl

2011-06-16 Thread George Bosilca
If there is no need for supporting multiple devices simultaneously, or need for checksum, or some level of support for fault tolerance, then an MTL will be enough. george. On Jun 16, 2011, at 09:47 , Peter Kjellström wrote: > On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 06:25:52 PM Jeff Squyres wrote: >> Thank

Re: [OMPI devel] new btl

2011-06-16 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jun 16, 2011, at 3:47 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote: >> I should say that if anyone is contemplating writing a new BTL, I'm happy >> to get on the phone / webex with you for an intro to the OMPI code base, >> point you in the right direction, etc. Ping me on/off list and we can >> setup a time. >

Re: [OMPI devel] new btl

2011-06-16 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 06:25:52 PM Jeff Squyres wrote: > Thanks Tim! > > I should say that if anyone is contemplating writing a new BTL, I'm happy > to get on the phone / webex with you for an intro to the OMPI code base, > point you in the right direction, etc. Ping me on/off list and we can

Re: [OMPI devel] new btl

2011-06-14 Thread Jeff Squyres
Thanks Tim! I should say that if anyone is contemplating writing a new BTL, I'm happy to get on the phone / webex with you for an intro to the OMPI code base, point you in the right direction, etc. Ping me on/off list and we can setup a time. Reading reading reading documentation is all well a

Re: [OMPI devel] new btl

2011-06-14 Thread Tim Mattox
Hi Larry, Good timing... Jeff Squyres just posted yesterday about this topic. You can find his suggestions here: http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2011/06/9366.php -- Tim On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > I apologize for asking elementary questions, I have s

Re: [OMPI devel] New BTL parameter

2007-12-14 Thread Gleb Natapov
If there is no objection I will commit this to the trunk next week. On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 05:34:30PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > Hi, > > Currently BTL has parameter btl_min_send_size that is no longer used. > I want to change it to be btl_rndv_eager_limit. This new parameter will > determine

Re: [OMPI devel] New BTL parameter

2007-12-13 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:18:10PM -0800, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: > Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:03:02PM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > > >> On Dec 9, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Currently BTL has parameter btl_min_send_size that is no longe

Re: [OMPI devel] New BTL parameter

2007-12-12 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
Gleb Natapov wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:03:02PM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: On Dec 9, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: Currently BTL has parameter btl_min_send_size that is no longer used. I want to change it to be btl_rndv_eager_limit. This new parameter will determine

Re: [OMPI devel] New BTL parameter

2007-12-12 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:03:02PM -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Dec 9, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > Currently BTL has parameter btl_min_send_size that is no longer used. > > I want to change it to be btl_rndv_eager_limit. This new parameter > > will > > determine a size of a

Re: [OMPI devel] New BTL parameter

2007-12-12 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Dec 9, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: Currently BTL has parameter btl_min_send_size that is no longer used. I want to change it to be btl_rndv_eager_limit. This new parameter will determine a size of a first fragment of rendezvous protocol. Now we use btl_eager_limit to set its