Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

2007-11-04 Thread Richard Graham
gov] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 04:05 PM Eastern Standard Time > To: Open MPI Developers > Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken > > It does. I was able to run the point-to-point intel tests with 3 procs > using sm and self, ob1 and dr. >

Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

2007-11-02 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
a nontrivial omb to check? > > -jms > Sent from my PDA > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Graham [mailto:rlgra...@ornl.gov] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 02:07 PM Eastern Standard Time > To: Open MPI Developers > Subject:Re: [OMPI devel]

Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

2007-11-02 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Did you run with a higher number of procs? -jms Sent from my PDA -Original Message- From: Richard Graham [mailto:rlgra...@ornl.gov] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 04:05 PM Eastern Standard Time To: Open MPI Developers Subject:Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken It

Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

2007-11-02 Thread Richard Graham
ntrivial omb to check? > > -jms > Sent from my PDA > > -Original Message- > From: Richard Graham [mailto:rlgra...@ornl.gov] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 02:07 PM Eastern Standard Time > To: Open MPI Developers > Subject:Re: [OMPI devel] openi

Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

2007-11-02 Thread Richard Graham
It does. I was able to run the point-to-point intel tests with 3 procs using sm and self, ob1 and dr. Rich On 11/2/07 3:57 PM, "Don Kerr" wrote: > Rich, > > Do the ompi_free_list changes impact the sm btl? Solaris SPARC sm btl > seems to have an issue starting with last nights put back but

Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

2007-11-02 Thread Don Kerr
Rich, Do the ompi_free_list changes impact the sm btl? Solaris SPARC sm btl seems to have an issue starting with last nights put back but I have not looked into it yet. -DON Richard Graham wrote: R16641 should have fixed the regression. Anyone using ompi_free_list_t_ex() and providing

Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

2007-11-02 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
om: Richard Graham [mailto:rlgra...@ornl.gov] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 02:07 PM Eastern Standard Time To: Open MPI Developers Subject: Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken R16641 should have fixed the regression. Anyone using ompi_free_list_t_ex() and providing a memory

Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

2007-11-02 Thread Richard Graham
R16641 should have fixed the regression. Anyone using ompi_free_list_t_ex() and providing a memory allocator would have been bitten by this, since I did not update this function (which will be deprecated in favor of a version parallel to ompi_free_list_t_new) to initialize the new fields define

Re: [OMPI devel] openib currently broken

2007-11-02 Thread Richard Graham
On 11/2/07 12:21 PM, "Jeff Squyres" wrote: > The freelist changes from yesterday appear to have broken the openib > btl. We didn't get lots of test failures in MTT last night only > because there was a separate (unrelated) typo in the ofud BTL that > prevented the nightly tarball from buildin