Ya -- see my later post -- I stood corrected. :-)
I already applied the patch to the 1.1 branch.
Thanks for the PML explanation.
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:28 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
Don't worry, I know what I'm doing. Moreover, the correct behavior is
implemented in the f77 version of MPI_Sta
Don't worry, I know what I'm doing. Moreover, the correct behavior is
implemented in the f77 version of MPI_Start, but not in the f77
version of MPI_Startall.
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
George --
Why would the request ID numbers change after the invocation to the
back
Disregard -- I stand corrected. STARTALL *does* mark the requests
argument as INOUT.
So do we sometimes actually return new requests? Just curious -- why
do we do that? Some kind of resource limits or something?
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
George --
Why would the
George --
Why would the request ID numbers change after the invocation to the
back-end MPI_Startall()? The request ID numbers were allocated when
the requests were created, so there's no reason that MPI_Startall()
should change them -- hence, there's no need to re-assign the same
values
Okay, I have heard back from several people. The consensus seems to be that:
1. a regular telecon is probably not worth doing at this time. We will look
at this again as more people start regularly contributing to the code
2. some kind of web-based system that keeps people apprised of what people
