Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1773

Whoa; you learn something new every day. I didn't even know that AC_CONFIG_LINKS existed! Let me go play with that... On Feb 26, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > jsquy...@osl.iu.edu wrote: > > +$(SYMLINKED_SOURCES): > > + if test ! -r $@ ; then \ > > + $(LN_S) $(SRC)/$@

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r1773

jsquy...@osl.iu.edu wrote: > +$(SYMLINKED_SOURCES): > + if test ! -r $@ ; then \ > + $(LN_S) $(SRC)/$@ $(HWLOC_top_srcdir)/tests/ports/$@; \ > + fi > Random question: could we use AC_CONFIG_LINKS for this ? Brice

Re: [hwloc-devel] 1.0-rc1

Brice Goglin, le Fri 26 Feb 2010 15:32:08 +0100, a écrit : > * are there actually some important warnings to fix ? In my memory there isn't. What hasn't been finished yet and to my opinion needs to be for v1.0, is the prefix/suffix/whatever to easily distinguish between physical and logical

[OMPI devel] Openmpi with slurm : salloc -c

Hi Ralph, I find a minor bug on the MCA composent: ras slurm. This one have an incorrect comportement with the "X number of processors per task" feature. On the file orte/mca/ras/slurm/ras_slurm_module.c, line 356: - The node slot number is divide with "cpus_per_task" information, but

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Merge tmp fault recovery branch into trunk

Sounds good to me. For those casually following this RFC let me summarize its current state. Josh and George (and anyone else that wishes to participate attending the forum) will meet sometime at the next MPI Forum meeting (March 8-10). I will post any relevant notes from this meeting back to

Re: [OMPI devel] typo in opal/event/evutil.h ?

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 06:41 -0700, Ralph Castain wrote: > Hi Nadia > > I thought I saw a correction go by recently that fixed this in the > trunk? What revision are you at, and on which branch? Hi Ralph, 1) hg branch: default But I'm getting the warning in the v1.5 branch too. 2) changeset:

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Merge tmp fault recovery branch into trunk

On Feb 26, 2010, at 01:50 , Josh Hursey wrote: > Any of those options are fine with me. I was thinking that if you wanted to > talk sooner, we might be able to help explain our intentions with this > framework a bit better. I figure that the framework interface will change a > bit as we all

Re: [OMPI devel] question about pids

Ralph, Adding a pid attribute to the process element would be great. Thanks, Greg On Feb 25, 2010, at 9:07 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > Easy to do. I'll dump all the pids at the same time when the launch completes > - effectively, it will be at the same point used by other debuggers to attach.

Re: [OMPI devel] typo in opal/event/evutil.h ?

Hi Nadia I thought I saw a correction go by recently that fixed this in the trunk? What revision are you at, and on which branch? On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Nadia Derbey wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting this warning during the make if configured with > --enable-picky:

[OMPI devel] typo in opal/event/evutil.h ?

Hi, I'm getting this warning during the make if configured with --enable-picky: ../../../../opal/event/evutil.h:62:7: warning: "_EVENT_SIZEOF_LONG_LONG" is not defined Looks like changeset #32687831ca9e has introduced a typo? I'm wondering whether _EVENT_SIZEOF_LONG_LONG shouldn't be changed to

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: Merge tmp fault recovery branch into trunk

Any of those options are fine with me. I was thinking that if you wanted to talk sooner, we might be able to help explain our intentions with this framework a bit better. I figure that the framework interface will change a bit as we all advance and incorporate our various techniques into it. I