Hi,
it's been some time since and I'd like to give an update on the issue.
Sorry for the long mail!
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:34:54AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> If anything moves on this front, let me know and I can create a mercurial
> branch out on bitbucket.org and add the relevant
Sorry for that, the message was supposed to be a private message to
Dirk. I did not notice (or expect) you override Reply-To.
Best regards
Manuel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 15:12 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> On 22 January 2009 at 15:23, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> | FWIW, "drop in replacement" in this context means recompile and
> | relink. We did not provide binary compatibility between the 1.2
> | series and the 1.3 series.
Das
Am Montag, den 12.01.2009, 18:04 -0500 schrieb Jeff Squyres:
> I don't see much harm in including this as long as rpath builds are
> still the default. If there's a non-default option to disable rpath
> builds, that would be fine with me.
>
> Does this patch disable rpath by default, or do
Hi,
attached you'll find a (trivial) patch against the latest svn trunk
(r20227) that adds a --disable-rpath to configure, so libraries can be
build with rpath disabled. The reason for adding this feature that was
that rpath is often problematic and it is removed in Debian anyway. (We
currently
Am Donnerstag, den 22.05.2008, 17:18 -0400 schrieb Jeff Squyres:
> Could you check with some of your other Debian maintainers?
I'm sorry that I can't check that before Monday! I'll let you know then
but I'm not aware of that.
Never thought about the impact of my initial request to Jeff. I
Am Montag, den 27.08.2007, 08:07 -0400 schrieb Jeff Squyres:
> Did you mean to send this to the SLURM list?
> :-)
Yes, I did. Sorry! It's one of those days... :-/
Best regards
Manuel
Hi everyone,
I noticed a very minor issue with sattach: If you pass an option it
doesn't understand, it asks you to look at "sbatch --help" which is a
little confusing:
$ sattach -X
sattach: invalid option -- X
Try "sbatch --help" for more information
I didn't find the right place in the source
Hello Brian!
Am Samstag, den 18.08.2007, 10:23 -0600 schrieb Brian Barrett:
> You are correct -- we now add a .note.GNU-stack to the assembly file
> if the assembler supports it, so that patch should no longer be needed.
Thanks for clarifying! I removed the patches.
Best regards
Manuel
Hi everyone,
in the Debian package of OpenMPI there has been a patch [1] for some
time which I think is obsolete. I did some reading on that topic but I'm
not very familiar with assembler, so I'm asking you here.
As far as I can see, removing the patch doesn't change the binaries
much. Neither
Am Freitag, den 17.08.2007, 14:27 -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 03:08:12PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> > I'll disable them in debian/rules then and document it.
> >
> > Dirk, are you fine with that?
>
> Sure thing. We simply didn't k
Am Freitag, den 17.08.2007, 14:49 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 08:26:50AM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
> > > Ok, --enable-progress-threads and --enable-mpi-threads cause the
> > > segfaults. If you compile without, everything works.
> >
> > > I'll now try if it's
Hi Terry,
Am Dienstag, den 17.07.2007, 08:54 -0400 schrieb Terry D. Dontje:
> This announcement is to request links to Binary Distributions of Open
> MPI that our community may have on the web for users to download. [...]
> What we need is the following:
I'm member of a group that maintains
13 matches
Mail list logo
