Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] B2B GUIDs too short (#783)

Bogdan, Thank you, will do so ASAP! --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/783#issuecomment-199514912___ Devel mailing list

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] B2B GUIDs too short (#783)

@abalashov , could you please test the following patch: https://gist.github.com/bogdan-iancu/694b00fcafb9561bfd31 Please take care, there is not much of a testing done so far on the patch. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] serialize_branches doesn't work after async() call (#835)

If we try to serialize branches after an async() call, it fails with: ``` core:serialize_branches: nothing to do - all same q! ``` We are able to list all branches from the config using the following snippet: ``` $var(i) = 0; while ($(branch(uri)[$var(i)]) != null) {

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Problem with using async and exec (#829)

Yes, I can still reproduce it. **Note: **First query is done independently. The second query i.e., port 49864 (/ws/index.php/...) is causing this problem. If you can provide me a patch with extra logging to the module, I can experiment and get back to you. --- You are receiving this because

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] ef2a42: scripts/opensipsctl: complete support for optional...

Branch: refs/heads/2.1 Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: ef2a42fcb9819b4ba858106f53d546506cffb8eb https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/ef2a42fcb9819b4ba858106f53d546506cffb8eb Author: Ovidiu Sas Date: 2016-03-21 (Mon, 21 Mar

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Problem with using async and exec (#829)

As per trace, both queries were successful (as HTTP), right ? If you can reproduce this, may provide a patch with some extra logs ? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] async() crashes in local_route (#820)

Closed #820. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/820#event-597050296___ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] async() crashes in local_route (#820)

Works as expected --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/820#issuecomment-199254537___ Devel mailing list

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] t_reply is sending provisional message even if 0x01 is set (#833)

Indeed, that is tricky as on a first view none of those function should force an internal t_newtran(). a quick trick you can do is to move your manual sl_send_reply() down in script, until you see the order between the two 100 replies gets swapped --- You are receiving this because you are

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] async() crashes in local_route (#820)

A fix is now available via 3a136fe and 940996f - async is disabled in local route. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] 3a136f: Prevent async in local route.

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: 3a136fed0a58ad295d1771131cf74deef26ad51d https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/3a136fed0a58ad295d1771131cf74deef26ad51d Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Date: 2016-03-21 (Mon,

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] 940996: Prevent async in local route.

Branch: refs/heads/2.1 Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: 940996fbbd9e7a131b4de4c1983df2788528250e https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/940996fbbd9e7a131b4de4c1983df2788528250e Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Date: 2016-03-21 (Mon, 21

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] 952b35: Accept XMLRPC requests without params node.

Branch: refs/heads/1.11 Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: 952b35882eacabac4ee562fc3dd10a137b83deba https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/952b35882eacabac4ee562fc3dd10a137b83deba Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Date: 2016-03-21 (Mon, 21

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] c4cc16: Accept XMLRPC requests without params node.

Branch: refs/heads/2.1 Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: c4cc161c42d30d9c6cd1f8a47acad708df5aa7bd https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/c4cc161c42d30d9c6cd1f8a47acad708df5aa7bd Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Date: 2016-03-21 (Mon, 21

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Possible bug in xmlrpc-ng (#826)

Closed #826 via d20b3d05409fc5f712c75b86223fe955e57ec5c4. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/826#event-596941242___ Devel

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [OpenSIPS/opensips] d20b3d: Accept XMLRPC requests without params node.

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips Commit: d20b3d05409fc5f712c75b86223fe955e57ec5c4 https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/d20b3d05409fc5f712c75b86223fe955e57ec5c4 Author: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Date: 2016-03-21 (Mon,

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [RELEASES] OpenSIPS 2.2 beta is scheduled for 31 of March

Hi, Bogdan! I’m about proper version numbering for build server. Is it possible to use numbers like 2.2.0 for beta and 2.2.1 and next for releases? -- Nick 2016-03-21 12:35 GMT+03:00 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu : > Hi all, > > The release of OpenSIPS 2.2 beta is scheduled for 31

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Problem starting OpenSIPs with TLS (#834)

Hello Mar 21 11:50:06 [8044] WARNING:core:main: no fork mode and no udp listen address found Mar 21 11:50:06 [8044] NOTICE:core:main: version: opensips 2.1.2 (x86_64/linux) Mar 21 11:50:06 [8044] NOTICE:signaling:mod_init: initializing module ... Mar 21 11:50:06 [8044]

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] Problem starting OpenSIPs with TLS (#834)

Can you apply this[1] patch, run opensips again, and paste the Warning? [1] https://gist.github.com/razvancrainea/95788fd927d23d84ac10#file-proto_tls_mem_debug-patch Thanks, Răzvan --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] t_reply is sending provisional message even if 0x01 is set (#833)

I do not see any. Those are the modules and steps used before relay. create_dialog permissions dialogue profile load balancer fraud detection dial plan topology hiding Is there a way to figure out which function might execute t_newtrans()? --- You are receiving this because you are

[OpenSIPS-Devel] [RELEASES] OpenSIPS 2.2 beta is scheduled for 31 of March

Hi all, The release of OpenSIPS 2.2 beta is scheduled for 31 of March - we still have a tremendous amount of work to do in terms of finishing pending new work, doing fixes, preparing documentation and many other. So heads up , time is ticketing - if anyone has new input or fixes/reports,

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] 2.1.2 Segfault in TLS (#803)

OK, I will try to make a TLS to UDP conversion in stateless mode to see if I can reproduce this crash --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] t_reply is sending provisional message even if 0x01 is set (#833)

no, create_dialog() does not forces a t_newtran(), maybe some other function you use from script ? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] t_reply is sending provisional message even if 0x01 is set (#833)

Is there a way to disable that and handle 100 message from the script? if not, does the t_newtran() is called on create_dialog()? Thank you. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] CRITICAL Errors make OpenSIPS crash & core dump (#816)

@michelep there is also a deb package for the debug sysmbols - please try to install that too - this will give a more relevant backtrace. Also try to do in gdb : "print *((char*)0xb6cd9280)" The crash is triggered by the failing of a DB operation in update_presentity. If you still have the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] t_reply is sending provisional message even if 0x01 is set (#833)

@apsaras , this is related to a recent fix 054836 - any t_newtran() forces a 100 trying reply automatically - this is done to be SIP consistent with all scenarios and also to be able to send the 100 trying as soon as possible. We will have to remove the 0x01 flag as it is not doing anything

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] 2.1.2 Segfault in TLS (#803)

@bogdan-iancu Yes, it was routed in a stateless way. Thanks for looking into it. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] CRITICAL Errors make OpenSIPS crash & core dump (#816)

Hi Bogdan, i've installed opensips from depbs because is on a production site. (gdb) print (char*)0xb6cd9280 $1 = 0xb6cd9280 (gdb) Let me know if i can help you in some ways ! And just to be clear, i change modules config as follow: PRESENCE and XCAP modules loadmodule "presence.so"

Re: [OpenSIPS-Devel] [opensips] MSILO Module not deleting sent messages Opensips 2.1.2 (#798)

Systemd was Rate Limiting the console logs so that's the reason the capture above was incomplete. Piping it to disk revealed the full debug log, thanks for the tip. The problem is that mongo does not have the AUTO INCREMENT id field such as MySQL . The equivalent key is " _id" and is