KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
Hi, thank you for review.
Your always welcome, thanks for helping with the controller.
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:46:02 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -424,17 +424,80 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page_cgr
if
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
An experimental patch.
This patch adds an interface to uncharge all pages in memory cgroup if
no tasks are in it. By this, a user can remove cgroup by 'rmdir'.
To uncharge all remaing pages in cgrop, echo -n 0 to memory.control_type.
(Just for test, please advise
Hi, thank you for review.
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 09:46:02 +0530
Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -424,17 +424,80 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page_cgr
if (atomic_dec_and_test(pc-ref_cnt)) {
page = pc-page;
lock_page_cgroup(page);
- mem =
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
Following patch is for successful rmdir in memory cgroup.
Currently, rmdir against memory cgroup will fail if charged page caches are
in cgroup.
(even if no tasks in cgroup.)
I don't like this. This patch implements forced uncharge against memory
cgroup.
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 16:30 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
Following patch is for successful rmdir in memory cgroup.
Currently, rmdir against memory cgroup will fail if charged page caches are
in cgroup.
(even if no tasks in cgroup.)
I don't like this. This patch implements forced
