On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:14 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 6:56 PM Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> >> > There are several issues:
> >> >
> >> > 1. coverage fail after
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Dafna Ron <d...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maor, I either need to get new glasses or a magnifier glass to read
>>>>>> what you wrote :-P
>>>>>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Piotr Kliczewski
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Martin Perina
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm waiting for last
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Tomáš Golembiovský
wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:51:50 +0300
> Eyal Edri wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Eyal Edri
]. This was not
> revealed in our local systems nor OST, because the issue is raised only when
> rows in vdc_options table are in specific order, you are now the 2nd system
> which was affected by this issue.
>
> Martin
>
> [1] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81762
>
>
> On
Hi all,
I've fetched rebased my env and updated my DB and now I've encountered
an issue that I can't start my engine, I get the following error, see
[1].
It seems that as part of the Backend startup we call DBConfigUtils.
and once the config value of DBI18NPrefix is being added, it is
dependent
I also ran the OST, see
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/1014/parameters/
Any how the fixes patch was merged:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/81198/
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gsher...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 30, 2017 8:46 AM
Yes, there is already an acked patch that solves it.
The weird thing is that the OST ran successfully when running with "ci
please build" although it seems that the artifact was not added to it.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Greg Sheremeta wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017
Thanks for the quick respond Juan
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Juan Hernández wrote:
> That failure was cased by this patch:
>
> restapi: Update to model 4.2.16 and metamodel 1.2.10
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81134
>
> And fixed by this one:
>
> restapi: Add
hence I have decided to work on that.But if it is
>>> already supported in 4.1v then I think I need to remove them from my
>>> proposal.:).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shubham
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Maor Lipchuk <mlipc..
com> wrote:
> Still doesn't work.
>
>
>
> On 03/02/2017 09:29 AM, Maor Lipchuk wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for that and thank you all for letting me know.
>> I've changed the permissions to public now.
>> I thought that I will just upload to youtube and share
;>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/02/2017 12:45 AM, Maor Lipchuk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> Thank you all for participating the deep dive yesterday
>>>
>>> The slides are here:
>>> http://re
it later to youtube.
Thanks,
Maor Lipchuk
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
same behaviour in [1] it's probably caused by removing
> limitation to TLSv1.0 during secure connection negotiation. We are
> investigating the issue ...
>
> Martin
>
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414696
> [2] https://gerrit.ovirt.org/70038
>
>
>
Hi all,
I see a consistent exception in the engine logs regarding
IllegalArgumentException: TLS when OVF_STORE disks are being updated (see
[1])
Host and engine are rebased on latest master.
Was there any change in this area lately?
Regards Maor
[1]
2017-01-19 18:32:31,026+02 INFO
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Erez wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Roy Golan wrote:
>
>> I'm getting the feeling I'm not alone in this, authoring and publishing a
>> wiki page isn't as used to be for long time.
>>
>> I want to suggest
Sent a fix patch:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/67260/
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Evgheni Dereveanchin
wrote:
> Thanks for the input!
>
> These were just suggestions as from first glance
> it looks like some VDSM change causes issues
> on Engine when parsing the JSON.
Hi all,
Few moments ago I've merged the Data Center 4.1 upgrade patches (see [1])
The patches introduce a change in the storage domains' meta data to version
4 which are attached to a 4.1 Data Center
Currently, there are no differences between version 3 and version 4, but
the plan will be to add
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Maor Lipchuk <mlipc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Nir Soffer <nsof...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Maor Lipchuk <mlipc...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Nir Soffer <nsof...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Maor Lipchuk <mlipc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been trying to remove a single snapshot and consistently fail with
> the
> > follo
Forwarding to devel@ovirt list.
cc'ing Adam as well
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dan Kenigsberg <dan...@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, May 8, 2016 at 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] Failing to rename volume on merge (remove snapshot
operation)
To: Maor Lipchuk <mlipc...@redhat.co
- Original Message -
From: Francesco Romani from...@redhat.com
To: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com
Cc: pklic...@redhat.com, devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 3:10:07 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Vdsm: extending maintainers team
- Original Message -
From:
Hi Yuko,
It is indeed referred to the Import Storage Domain.
There is already a patch which fix the message
see https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/40084
Regards,
Maor
- Original Message -
From: Yuko Katabami ykata...@redhat.com
To: devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 8:51:32 AM
Hi Sven,
I tried changing template name on my setup (based on latest master) and it
worked.
Can you please share the output of the following psql command on your engine
DB:
SELECT vm_guid, vm_name, entity_type, description from vm_static where vm_name
= 'template1'
Can u also search this
I would like to suggest another solution,
Why not let the audit log present the extra error description.
VDSM can override the existing error message before returning it to the
engine with the extra data.
that way you will not have to add new attributes to the existing API,
and the dialog
phase maybe it is more fitting to add an event log describing the error
in more details.
Regards,
Maor
On 05/13/2014 05:20 PM, Yoav Kleinberger wrote:
Maor can you please explain? I'm not familiar with this audit log
- Original Message -
From: Maor Lipchuk mlipc...@redhat.com
To: Yoav
On 01/30/2014 10:47 AM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
Dear engine-core maintainers,
I'd like to propose Arik Hadas as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend
Since he started with oVirt project in October 2012 he was working in various
areas in engine core, demonstrated his abilities with more than
On 01/26/2014 02:47 PM, Tal Nisan wrote:
Hi core maintainers,
I would like to propose Liron Aravot as an engine-core maintainer.
Liron joined the oVirt project on June 2012, and has since contributed
over 170 patches to master (not counting backports to various stable
branches).
He has
Nice one
On 07/03/2013 03:02 PM, Roy Golan wrote:
For those of us of dream of clean install a single project like maven
please note that
mvn has a flag which enables you to build a specific artifact even if
your not at that directory
mvn -pl groupID:artifactId
so say you modified
Hi, can u be more specific? what exactly is not explicit?
Regards,
Maor
On 05/29/2013 01:48 PM, wlbleaboy@126 wrote:
Hi, all:
Is there anyone used Intellij to build and deploy ovirt-engine
http://www.ovirt.org/Building_Ovirt_Engine/IDE#IntelliJ is not explicit,
I tend to agree as well regarding the -1 message, although I think that
since -2 blocks your change from, merging it, it should still be strict.
Perhaps we could consider adding one more negative value?
Regards,
Maor
On 02/20/2013 11:59 AM, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
I like most of these
+1
On 11/14/2012 06:12 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
Allon has worked on oVirt for the past 10 months.
With 534 patches ranging from cleanups, to complex features like user
level api and storage live migration. In addition, Allon has been
instrumental in the number of patch reviews he has done.
Hi Laszlo,
Why not change the eclipse configuration, that it won't add @override
annotation when saving the class (Java - Editor -Save Actions)
but instead use warning instead (java - compiler - Errors/Warnings)
Regards,
Maor
On 11/05/2012 07:08 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
On 08/22/2012 12:21 PM, Allon Mureinik wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maor Lipchuk mlipc...@redhat.com
To: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
Cc: Allon Mureinik amure...@redhat.com, engine-devel
engine-devel@ovirt.org, Eduardo Warszawski
ewars...@redhat.com, Yeela Kaplan ykap
On 08/14/2012 05:23 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 08/14/2012 02:35 PM, Maor Lipchuk wrote:
How should we handle the auditLogMessages?
Basically when a command ends it print an audit log.
When we will start to use multiple tasks I assume user might get a bulk
of audit logs which are actually
How should we handle the auditLogMessages?
Basically when a command ends it print an audit log.
When we will start to use multiple tasks I assume user might get a bulk
of audit logs which are actually related to the same action (when we
fail for example the process will be create and delete).
It
36 matches
Mail list logo