On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 02:34:12AM -0400, Francesco Romani wrote:
>
> > >> When could we expect to have it running per commit on a Jenkins slaves?
> >
> > virt tests are running
> > There is a common initialization issue with VdsProxy at the moment, once
> > it's
> > fixed the virt tests can be
On Thu 10 Apr 2014 09:55:21 AM CEST, Francesco Romani wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Francesco Romani"
>> To: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, devel@ovirt.org
>> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 8:43:46 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [Devel] Vdsm f
- Original Message -
> From: "Francesco Romani"
> To: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 8:43:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [Devel] Vdsm functional tests
>
> > Plus ideally a better initialization to get rid of that
- Original Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
> To: "Francesco Romani"
> Cc: devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, "Dan Kenigsberg"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 8:37:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [Devel] Vdsm
- Original Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
> To: "Francesco Romani"
> Cc: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 8:37:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [Devel] Vdsm functional tests
>
>
> On Apr
On Apr 10, 2014, at 08:34 , Francesco Romani wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
>> To: "Dan Kenigsberg"
>> Cc: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, devel@ovirt.org
>> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 8:13:55 AM
>> Sub
- Original Message -
> From: "Michal Skrivanek"
> To: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> Cc: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 8:13:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [Devel] Vdsm functional tests
> >> When could we expec
On Apr 10, 2014, at 06:37 , Vered Volansky wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Dan Kenigsberg"
>> To: devel@ovirt.org
>> Cc: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, ve...@redhat.com, from...@redhat.com
>> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 6:08:31 P
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> To: devel@ovirt.org
> Cc: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, ve...@redhat.com, from...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 6:08:31 PM
> Subject: [Devel] Vdsm functional tests
>
> Functional tests are intende
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> To: devel@ovirt.org
> Cc: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, ve...@redhat.com, dougsl...@redhat.com,
> from...@redhat.com, asegu...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 6:08:31 PM
> Subject: Vdsm functional tests
>
> Functional tests are intende
On 04/07/2014 05:04 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 11:47:26PM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 04/03/2014 12:24 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 12:31:44PM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Fun
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:00:14AM +0300, ybronhei wrote:
> On 04/07/2014 01:42 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 11:18:19AM +0300, ybronhei wrote:
> >>On 04/03/2014 07:31 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> >>>On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> Functional te
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 11:47:26PM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 12:24 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 12:31:44PM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> >>On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >>>Functional tests are intended to verify t
On 04/07/2014 01:42 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 11:18:19AM +0300, ybronhei wrote:
On 04/03/2014 07:31 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Functional tests are intended to verify that a running Vdsm instance
does what it shou
On 04/03/2014 12:24 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 12:31:44PM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Functional tests are intended to verify that a running Vdsm instance
does what it should, when treated as a black box, over its
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 11:18:19AM +0300, ybronhei wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 07:31 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> >On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >>Functional tests are intended to verify that a running Vdsm instance
> >>does what it should, when treated as a black box, over
On 04/03/2014 07:31 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Functional tests are intended to verify that a running Vdsm instance
does what it should, when treated as a black box, over its public API.
They should be comprehensive and representative of
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 12:31:44PM -0400, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >Functional tests are intended to verify that a running Vdsm instance
> >does what it should, when treated as a black box, over its public API.
> >
> >They should be compreh
- Original Message -
> From: "Francesco Romani"
> To: "Antoni Segura Puimedon"
> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" , devel@ovirt.org, ve...@redhat.com,
> dougsl...@redhat.com, "vdsm-devel"
>
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:34:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Vdsm functional tests
>
>
> - Original Mess
- Original Message -
> From: "Antoni Segura Puimedon"
> To: "Francesco Romani"
> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" , devel@ovirt.org, ve...@redhat.com,
> dougsl...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:28:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Vdsm functional tests
> > I know virt functional tests arent' compr
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> To: devel@ovirt.org
> Cc: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, ve...@redhat.com, dougsl...@redhat.com,
> from...@redhat.com, asegu...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:08:31 PM
> Subject: Vdsm functional tests
>
> Functional tests are intended
On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Functional tests are intended to verify that a running Vdsm instance
does what it should, when treated as a black box, over its public API.
They should be comprehensive and representative of a typical field usage
of Vdsm. It is a sin to break such a
- Original Message -
> From: "Francesco Romani"
> To: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> Cc: devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, ve...@redhat.com,
> dougsl...@redhat.com, asegu...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:25:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Vdsm functional tests
>
> - Original Message
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> To: devel@ovirt.org
> Cc: vdsm-de...@ovirt.org, ve...@redhat.com, dougsl...@redhat.com,
> from...@redhat.com, asegu...@redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:08:31 PM
> Subject: Vdsm functional tests
>
> Functional tests are intende
Functional tests are intended to verify that a running Vdsm instance
does what it should, when treated as a black box, over its public API.
They should be comprehensive and representative of a typical field usage
of Vdsm. It is a sin to break such a test - but we must be able to know
when such a s
25 matches
Mail list logo
