Am Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:33:11 +0200
schrieb Martin :
> Am 10/12/2016 um 12:57 PM schrieb Ludwig Knüpfer:
> > Am 12. Oktober 2016 09:48:28 MESZ, schrieb Oleg Hahm
> > :
> >> as far I'm concerned it has been an undocumented coding convention so
> >> far to use `int` or `unsigned int` for iterator v
Am Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:34:19 +0200
schrieb Martine Lenders :
> we now have the third person wondering about the qemu-i386 port. Fact
> is, it doesn't work (we do not even have the unittests activated
> anymore). Is there a reason why we did not drop it yet (except making
> all the good work by René
Am Tue, 9 Aug 2016 10:21:51 +
schrieb MiTsArAs Jimaras :
> Because I have told to do so from my university!
>
> I can't explain further because I DON'T KNOW WHY!
Hi,
then either ask your prof / TA what your objective is or drop the class.
You may quote the author of the qemu-i386 port (that
Hi!
Am Fri, 29 Jul 2016 08:40:55 +
schrieb MiTsArAs Jimaras :
> Now I get this on make all:
>
> [...]
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../../lib32/libm.so: undefined
> reference to `__get_cpu_features@GLIBC_PRIVATE'
There seems to be something broken.
The linker should not care for
Am Fri, 1 Apr 2016 17:56:38 +0200
schrieb Hauke Petersen :
> RIOT can certainly be ported to the ESP8622, and it would make for a
> very interesting platform. I think some people (including myself) have
> briefly looked into this, but there has been created no countable
> output, yet.
Hi,
if
Sorry Adam, I don't know how your name got intermixed into my answer.
I had no intention to misquote you, and I like your previous letter very much.
--
“My head was aching, and I had a singular feeling—altogether new
to me—that some one else was trying to get alice’s configuration”
— http://the
Am Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:36:32 +0100
schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli :
> this is a gentle reminder to input your opinions on this thread before
> Wednesday night (i.e., tomorrow).
You cannot use any of my contributions under any BSD license, because I don't
think that it is a logic choice.
I would welcom
Am Tue, 9 Dec 2014 00:43:26 +0100
schrieb Carsten Bormann :
> On 09 Dec 2014, at 00:09, Adam Hunt wrote:
> I could have people working on RIOT for those 1.5 years...
If you actually had any intentions to contribute to RIOT, then you would dual
or tri-license your contributions ...
--
“My head
(( Sorry for x-posting, I assumed we'd talk on users@riot-os :) ))
Am Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:59:40 +0100
schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli :
> But in the first place, we would like to debate this topic. In particular:
> is anyone violently opposing the idea of migrating to a less restrictive
> license, such
Am Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:29:52 +0100
schrieb Oleg Hahm :
> Sorry for the slightly RIOT unrelated mail, but I just came across this call:
> https://gnome.org/groupon/
> I think for us, as an open source community, it should be something we care
> about.
The marketing department of Groupon is rejoici
10 matches
Mail list logo
