Re: [PATCH 8/8] score: Replace watchdog handler implementation

On 03/03/16 23:44, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > "be placed on Red-Black Trees for set management." copy-pasted comment > should be Chains? Thanks, for spotting this. > > "watchdog is scheduled and a black node". ditto, black should be red > for the second one.

error in building RTEMS Source Builder

So I am trying to build the RTEMS Source Builder on my Ubuntu machine and this is the report file that gets generated! RTEMS Tools Project - Source Builder Error Report Build: error: building rtems-tools-HEAD-1 Command Line: ../source-builder/sb-set-builder --log=l-i386.txt

Building RTEMS hello world image using CMake

I wanted to build a hello world image of RTEMS using cmake. Can someone provide me steps for doing so or point me to the right resources ? ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH 8/8] score: Replace watchdog handler implementation

Thanks a lot for your review. - Gedare Bloom schrieb: > I scanned through most of it. I just have a few minor issues/questions: > > There is an _Assert(0) followed by a TODO. This _Assert() is likely > dead/untested code block. It may be worth fabricating a fatal test for >

Re: GSoC 2016 Interested in Tracing was Re:

Hi Vivek, Chris is definitely the person most knowledgeable in this area. On 03/03/2016 11:45 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Vivek Kukreja > wrote: Hi everyone I am Vivek Kukreja, currently

Re: Porting Rock on RTEMS

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Sambeet Panigrahi wrote: > Hi, > I am interested in working on porting Rock to RTEMS for GSoC-2016.I have > been trying to understand the Rock libraries and previous work undertaken > regarding this project. I just wanted to know if this

Re: Interested to work on Tracing Tool(GSOC)

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Vivek Kukreja wrote: > Hi everyone > > I'm sorry i did not add subject to the previous mail. > > > I fixed this in my reply. I hope it made it out and you saw it. --joel > I am Vivek Kukreja, currently pursuing Masters from India. I'm

Interested to work on Tracing Tool(GSOC)

Hi everyone I'm sorry i did not add subject to the previous mail. I am Vivek Kukreja, currently pursuing Masters from India. I'm interested in applying for GSOC this year. I am a skilled C Programmer and have strong understanding of OS concepts. I'm interested in system programming and kernel

GSoC 2016 Interested in Tracing was Re:

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Vivek Kukreja wrote: > Hi everyone > > > I am Vivek Kukreja, currently pursuing Masters from India. I'm interested > in applying for GSOC this year. I am a skilled C Programmer and have strong > understanding of OS concepts. I'm

[no subject]

Hi everyone I am Vivek Kukreja, currently pursuing Masters from India. I'm interested in applying for GSOC this year. I am a skilled C Programmer and have strong understanding of OS concepts. I'm interested in system programming and kernel development. I am interested to work on topics

Re: [PATCH 6/6] Remove AVR Architectural Port

This was committed weeks ago. Must have been held back due to size. --joel On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > From: Joel Sherrill > > Updates #2443. > --- > ___ devel mailing list

Re: [PATCH 2/8] score: Add Processor_mask, etc.

OK. Makes sense based on what appears to be coming. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > --- > cpukit/score/Makefile.am | 1 + > cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/processormask.h | 90 > >

Re: [PATCH 5/8] score: Add _Per_CPU_Is_boot_processor()

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 03/03/16 16:12, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> Other than bookkeeping, what is this going to be used for? >> > > Its used later in the watchdog tick. The boot processor manages the wall > clock time.

Re: [PATCH 1/8] score: Add CPU_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 03/03/16 16:10, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> How does this interact with the pthread affinity and cpuset size? >> > > Its unrelated to the high level API. > > >> If we end up with a port that can

Re: [PATCH 7/8] score: Distribute clock tick to all online CPUs

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 03/03/16 16:14, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> I don't necessarily see anything wrong but I don't see the overall design >> and execution flow from the code. Is there some documentation? >> > > I will

Re: [PATCH 7/8] score: Distribute clock tick to all online CPUs

I don't necessarily see anything wrong but I don't see the overall design and execution flow from the code. Is there some documentation? Sorry.. used the wrong reply to email address and it didn't hit the list. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>

Re: [PATCH 6/8] score: Add _SMP_Before_multitasking_action()

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 03/03/16 16:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> The git log message needs more but it looks good otherwise. >> > > Ok, I had to add this for the Cortex-A9 MPCore which has per-processor > registers for

Re: [PATCH 7/8] score: Distribute clock tick to all online CPUs

On 03/03/16 16:14, Joel Sherrill wrote: I don't necessarily see anything wrong but I don't see the overall design and execution flow from the code. Is there some documentation? I will update the clock driver documentation once the new documentation repository is ready for contribution. --

Re: [PATCH 5/8] score: Add _Per_CPU_Is_boot_processor()

On 03/03/16 16:12, Joel Sherrill wrote: Other than bookkeeping, what is this going to be used for? Its used later in the watchdog tick. The boot processor manages the wall clock time. How is it configured? The _SMP_Fatal() call at the end of the patch hints that there is some related

Re: Testing the rock port

You will need to find out how you can run Rock. Ideally, Qemu will work for it, from what I can tell they used the i386-rtems/pc486 BSP. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Sambeet Panigrahi wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Sambeet Panigrahi

Re: [PATCH 6/8] score: Add _SMP_Before_multitasking_action()

On 03/03/16 16:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: The git log message needs more but it looks good otherwise. Ok, I had to add this for the Cortex-A9 MPCore which has per-processor registers for the global timer used by the clock driver. This might be useful for other drivers as well. -- Sebastian

Re: [PATCH 4/8] score: Add _SMP_Online_processors

Looks OK. I assume this is infrastructure for something that is coming. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > --- > cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h | 11 +++ > cpukit/score/src/smp.c | 5 - >

Re: [PATCH 1/8] score: Add CPU_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

How does this interact with the pthread affinity and cpuset size? If we end up with a port that can support more than 32, then do we increase the cpuset size or make applications more to variable cpuset's? What's the intended use? On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Sebastian Huber <

Re: [PATCH 6/8] score: Add _SMP_Before_multitasking_action()

The git log message needs more but it looks good otherwise. --joel On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Update #2554. > --- > cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/percpu.h | 8 +++ > cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h | 48

Re: [PATCH 3/8] score: Rename Per_CPU_Control::started

Looks good. On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Rename Per_CPU_Control::started into Per_CPU_Control::online to match > standard nomenclature. > --- > cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/percpu.h | 6 +++--- > cpukit/score/src/smp.c

[PATCH 5/8] score: Add _Per_CPU_Is_boot_processor()

--- cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/percpu.h | 19 +++ cpukit/score/src/smp.c| 2 ++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/percpu.h b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/percpu.h index 2b05b78..19f46d2 100644 ---

Use red-black tree for Watchdog Handler

This patch set replaces the Watchdog Handler implementation based on delta chains with a red-black tree. The existing red-black tree infrastructure is reused. Performance results are quite good. See also: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2554 ___ devel

[PATCH 2/8] score: Add Processor_mask, etc.

--- cpukit/score/Makefile.am | 1 + cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/processormask.h | 90 cpukit/score/preinstall.am | 4 ++ 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+) create mode 100644

[PATCH 4/8] score: Add _SMP_Online_processors

--- cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h | 11 +++ cpukit/score/src/smp.c | 5 - testsuites/smptests/smpipi01/init.c| 10 ++ 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h

[PATCH 1/8] score: Add CPU_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

Maximum number of processors of all systems supported by this CPU port. --- cpukit/score/cpu/arm/rtems/score/cpu.h | 2 ++ cpukit/score/cpu/bfin/rtems/score/cpu.h | 2 ++ cpukit/score/cpu/epiphany/rtems/score/cpu.h | 2 ++ cpukit/score/cpu/i386/rtems/score/cpu.h | 2 ++

[PATCH 6/8] score: Add _SMP_Before_multitasking_action()

Update #2554. --- cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/percpu.h | 8 +++ cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/smpimpl.h | 48 +++- cpukit/score/src/percpu.c | 92 +++--- cpukit/score/src/smp.c | 23

[PATCH 3/8] score: Rename Per_CPU_Control::started

Rename Per_CPU_Control::started into Per_CPU_Control::online to match standard nomenclature. --- cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/percpu.h | 6 +++--- cpukit/score/src/smp.c| 4 ++-- cpukit/score/src/threadcreateidle.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6

Definition of RTEMS IoT Projects

Hi I added an Open Project page for Internet of Things support. This is a very broad category of buzzword bingo and covers everything from Bluetooth and 6LoWPAN to messaging protocols. It can be done on boards like the the Pi or BBB or smaller devices.

Fwd: Testing the rock port

-- Forwarded message -- From: Sambeet Panigrahi Date: Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:11 PM Subject: Testing the rock port To: devel-requ...@rtems.org Hi, I am interested in working on porting Rock on RTEMS for GSOC-2016 . I have gone through all the libraries of