On 09/06/2021 20:47, Peter Dufault wrote:
Similar comments apply to RAM. I'll be adding HyperRAM attached to FlexSPI port A chip select 2
and it won't be setup until we get past "bsp_start_hook_0()". So initial stack needs to
be in on-chip RAM and we can't access anything outside of on-chip
On 9/6/21 5:05 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:
> On 09/06/2021 01:52, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 8/6/21 8:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2021 05:07, Chris Johns wrote:
On 7/6/21 6:40 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:> I think the Options don't
need
documentation changes because
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:02 PM wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gedare Bloom
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 8:33 PM
> > To: Sommer, Jan
> > Cc: Amar Takhar ; Chris Johns ;
> > devel@rtems.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i386: Remove unneeded include header files
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Gedare Bloom
> Sent: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 8:33 PM
> To: Sommer, Jan
> Cc: Amar Takhar ; Chris Johns ;
> devel@rtems.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i386: Remove unneeded include header files
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:27 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
Let's get back to the patch itself and the initialization of "FlexSPI"
peripheral.
The FlexSPI is one of the "imxrt" on-chip devices that can have flash attached
to it, and that the on-chip boot ROM knows how to probe, configure, and then
boot from. The "imxrt" chips don't have on-chip flash,
On 09/06/2021 19:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 09/06/2021 18:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
For sparc/leon3, psx05.exe and psxmsg01 time out on sis. I I massively
increased the timeout as an experiment to psx05 and it never finished.
This is a bit strange. I can reproduce this issue. The tests run
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:27 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:21 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >
> > It is helpful. there should be
> > remote: 3: update trac
> >
> ok, actually what's missing is
> 0: init
>
> I think the hooks need to be updated for rtems-libbsd. without running
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:21 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> It is helpful. there should be
> remote: 3: update trac
>
ok, actually what's missing is
0: init
I think the hooks need to be updated for rtems-libbsd. without running
init, the TMP_REV is not generated, so there's nothing to send to
trac.
From: zack
---
cpukit/include/rtems/posix/timer.h| 6 ++-
cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c | 5 +-
cpukit/posix/src/timergettime.c | 61 ---
testsuites/psxtests/psxtimer02/psxtimer.c | 26 +++---
4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 17
It is helpful. there should be
remote: 3: update trac
now we need to find out why. seems the problem really is on git side.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:03 PM wrote:
>
> That`s the output I got.
> Not sure if it is helpful:
>
> $ git push upstream HEAD~:5-freebsd-12
> Counting objects: 4, done.
>
I joined the Issue. Thanks for working on this.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:30 AM Robin Müller wrote:
>
> I posted a reply but I think it did not go through. Will post it now.
>
> Kind Regards
> Robin
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 18:31, Robin Müller wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I received a reply from
That`s the output I got.
Not sure if it is helpful:
$ git push upstream HEAD~:5-freebsd-12
Counting objects: 4, done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done.
Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 658 bytes | 658.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 4 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 10:51 AM wrote:
>
> Thanks. Pushed to master, 5-freebsd-12 and 6-freebsd-12.
> Short question: Does the buildbot recognize the pushes to
> rtems-libbsd/5-freebsd-12 and update the ticket?
> I added the ticket number to the commit description, but the ticket has not
> been
On 09/06/2021 19:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 09/06/2021 18:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
For sparc/leon3, psx05.exe and psxmsg01 time out on sis. I I massively
increased the timeout as an experiment to psx05 and it never finished.
This is a bit strange. I can reproduce this issue. The tests run
On 09/06/2021 18:51, Joel Sherrill wrote:
For sparc/leon3, psx05.exe and psxmsg01 time out on sis. I I massively
increased the timeout as an experiment to psx05 and it never finished.
This is a bit strange. I can reproduce this issue. The tests run on
gr740/sis and arm/realview_pbx_a9_qemu.
I posted a reply but I think it did not go through. Will post it now.
Kind Regards
Robin
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 18:31, Robin Müller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I received a reply from STM32 about the licensing issues. They requested
> more specific information about the "vendor device restrictions" for
Hi
For sparc/leon3, psx05.exe and psxmsg01 time out on sis. I I massively
increased the timeout as an experiment to psx05 and it never finished.
Any insight is appreciated.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
Thanks. Pushed to master, 5-freebsd-12 and 6-freebsd-12.
Short question: Does the buildbot recognize the pushes to
rtems-libbsd/5-freebsd-12 and update the ticket?
I added the ticket number to the commit description, but the ticket has not
been updated.
Best regards,
Jan
> -Original
On 09/06/2021 18:39, Đức Anh wrote:
- Is there a way to enable SMP for SPARC/LEON3 in RTEMS 6?
Just set "RTEMS_SMP = True" in your config.ini:
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/bld/index.html#migration-from-autoconf-automake
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr.
Hi all,
I am trying to run my RTEMS application in the TSIM-LEON3 simulator. It
works fine with RTEMS version 6 (master branch) but it is not when I build
with RTEMS version 5.1 (branch 5). The reason why I revert back to version
5 because I want to use the SMP feature of RTEMS, and I haven't
Hi,
I received a reply from STM32 about the licensing issues. They requested
more specific information about the "vendor device restrictions" for the
HAL code.
The issue is here:
https://github.com/STMicroelectronics/STM32CubeH7/issues/139
Can anyone provide more information about this (maybe
Hi
Two tests fail on psim with resource snapshot assertions:
../../../testsuites/psxtests/psxkey08/init.c: 162
rtems_resource_snapshot_check()
../../../testsuites/fstests/fsimfsgeneric01/init.c: 462
rtems_resource_snapshot_check()
Does anyone see these on other BSPs? It would be unusual if a
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:43 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 08/06/2021 20:16, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > The addition of the entire*utime*() family of functions resulted
> > in this call returning ENOENT not ENXIO. This is better aligned
> > with the POSIX
Hello Richi,
could you please adjust your new Doxygen comments so that they are in
line with the Doxygen comments you are replace.
On 09/06/2021 09:39, Richi Dubey wrote:
#ifndef _RTEMS_SCORE_SCHEDULERSTRONGAPA_H
#define _RTEMS_SCORE_SCHEDULERSTRONGAPA_H
#include
-#include
On 8/6/21 11:52 pm, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote:
> I would also like to backport this to 5-freebsd-12 to solve this issue there
> as well.
> I created a corresponding ticket: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/4452#ticket
OK for 5.
Chris
___
devel mailing
---
spec/build/testsuites/smptests/grp.yml| 2 +
.../testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa03.yml| 21 +
testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa03/init.c | 358 ++
.../smpstrongapa03/smpstrongapa03.doc | 11 +
.../smpstrongapa03/smpstrongapa03.scn | 2 +
5
---
spec/build/testsuites/smptests/grp.yml| 2 +
.../testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa02.yml| 21 +
testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa02/init.c | 373 ++
.../smpstrongapa02/smpstrongapa02.doc | 11 +
.../smpstrongapa02/smpstrongapa02.scn | 2 +
5
---
testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa01/init.c | 72 ++-
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa01/init.c
b/testsuites/smptests/smpstrongapa01/init.c
index bf8bc05231..e7abacd519 100644
---
This change allows for the migration of higher priority tasks on the
arrival of a lower priority task limited by affinity constraints.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/scheduler.h | 10 +-
.../include/rtems/score/schedulerstrongapa.h | 170 +++-
cpukit/score/src/schedulerstrongapa.c
Hi,
The following patches update the Strong APA Scheduler, the existing
test for the scheduler and add two more test for the scheduler that
use different number of cpus. The scheduler has been tested on rtems-test
with Strong APA scheduler set as the default scheduler; It performs as good
as
On 09/06/2021 01:52, Chris Johns wrote:
On 8/6/21 8:26 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 08/06/2021 05:07, Chris Johns wrote:
On 7/6/21 6:40 pm, Christian Mauderer wrote:> I think the Options don't need
documentation changes because the options in the
waf based build system are now documented
31 matches
Mail list logo
