Re: Change build specification files from YAML to JSON?

On 27.04.23 00:47, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 3:58 PM Gedare Bloom > wrote: Is the result of this discussion to use CSafeLoader for now? Or do we still debate the transition to JSON? I see some quirks need to be dealt with as you mentione

Re: [PATCH 2/5] build: Use CSafeLoader if available

On 27.04.23 20:27, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:46 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: On 27.04.23 02:11, Chris Johns wrote: On 26/4/2023 6:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: The CSafeLoader uses the C libyaml libary to considerably speed up the loading of YAML files. No from me. What

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 27.04.23 20:05, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas wrote: On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: Why don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS Project? I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an open-source so

Re: Change build specification files from YAML to JSON?

On 26/4/2023 6:22 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 26.04.23 01:52, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 25/4/2023 5:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Tooling makes sense if you have a high change rate. >> >> That is not the use case I am discussing and it is not a factor. >> >>> This is not the case for the RTE

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 28/4/2023 4:05 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas wrote: >> On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Why >>> don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS >>> Project? >> >> I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 7:06 PM Chris Johns wrote: > Hi, > > All RSB repo commits need to be posted for review and independent approval > given > before being pushed to the top level repo. > I thought this was the policy for all top level repositories. There is a degree of trust on any posted pa

Re: [PATCH 2/5] build: Use CSafeLoader if available

On 28/4/2023 4:27 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:46 PM Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 27.04.23 02:11, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 26/4/2023 6:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: The CSafeLoader uses the C libyaml libary to considerably speed up the loading of YAML files.

Re: [PATCH 2/5] build: Use CSafeLoader if available

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:46 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 27.04.23 02:11, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 26/4/2023 6:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> The CSafeLoader uses the C libyaml libary to considerably speed up the > >> loading of YAML files. > > No from me. > > What do you mean with not f

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas wrote: > > On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Why > > don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS > > Project? > > I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an > open-source solution which may be se

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: Why don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS Project? I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an open-source solution which may be seen as a major roadblock. Am I right assuming that GitLab Community i

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 27/4/2023 4:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > what is your (or the RTEMS Project in general) plan to maintain the tools and > ensure that we can use up to date versions of Newlib, GCC, Binutils, and GDB? > This involves building the latest versions, reviewing build issues, reporting > bugs, writin