Westernization of RTEMS/stm32H7 [was: Re: Discussion: How to handle HALs, SDKs and libraries]

2023-07-15 Thread Karel Gardas
Hello, Christian mentioned Zephyr west tool as one of good/possible candidates for RTEMS tree modularization especially with regarding to HALs and other 3rd party libraries. For comparison with my previous git submodulization of RTEMS/stm32H7 I've also westernized the same in a similar

Re: Discussion: How to handle HALs, SDKs and libraries

2023-07-15 Thread Karel Gardas
On 7/15/23 16:00, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote: We should avoid rebasing and overwriting the old branch because we have to preserve a version that can be used with older RTEMS versions. So for rebasing, we would have to use multiple branches. Instead of rtems-6-branch, it could be a rtems- or

grlib changes Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS

2023-07-15 Thread Joel Sherrill
The recent grlib changes introduced a Coverity issues. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 12:22 AM Subject: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for RTEMS To: Hi, Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to RTEMS found with Coverity

Re: Discussion: How to handle HALs, SDKs and libraries

2023-07-15 Thread oss
Hello Karel, Am 15.07.23 um 15:03 schrieb Karel Gardas: On 7/15/23 14:33, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote: I like submodules because they are well-supported by the usual tools. Honestly. I like submodules idea, but hate its implementation. Some reasons: - submodules were added as a light weight

Re: Discussion: How to handle HALs, SDKs and libraries

2023-07-15 Thread Karel Gardas
On 7/15/23 14:33, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote: I like submodules because they are well-supported by the usual tools. Honestly. I like submodules idea, but hate its implementation. Some reasons: - submodules were added as a light weight feature and during the development of git/submodule

Re: Discussion: How to handle HALs, SDKs and libraries

2023-07-15 Thread oss
Hello Karel, Am 15.07.23 um 12:17 schrieb Karel Gardas: On 7/15/23 09:47, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote: Am 15.07.23 um 01:48 schrieb Karel Gardas:   Hello, I've created setup where I've put updated STM32H7 HAL consisting of two submodules: - stm32h7xx_hal_driver - cmsis_device_h7 and ARM's

Re: Discussion: How to handle HALs, SDKs and libraries

2023-07-15 Thread Karel Gardas
On 7/15/23 09:47, o...@c-mauderer.de wrote: Am 15.07.23 um 01:48 schrieb Karel Gardas:   Hello, I've created setup where I've put updated STM32H7 HAL consisting of two submodules: - stm32h7xx_hal_driver - cmsis_device_h7 and ARM's - CMSIS_5 into hals/arm/stm32h7 to follow related BSP

Re: Discussion: How to handle HALs, SDKs and libraries

2023-07-15 Thread oss
Hello Karel, thanks for trying that. I wouldn't object to add it to 6 but I wouldn't expect it either because it means a lot of adaptions to the release scripts. Chris most likely can tell you more about whether it's even thinkable at that point in the release cycle or not. Am 15.07.23 um