OK
Thanks
Chris
On 13/9/2023 12:44 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> The availability of a proper RTEMS_DEFINE_GLOBAL_SYMBOL() implementation
> depends on __asm__() and thus __GNUC__.
>
> Clarify documentation.
>
> Update #4953.
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 5 +++--
> 1 file
On 12/9/2023 5:55 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 12.09.23 09:43, Chris Johns wrote:
> Setting OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS and TEST_OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS through the
> configuration
> file always worked.
Great. I am seeing:
OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS = -O2 -g -fdata-sections
Use a symbol value relative to an existing symbol address to make the
test work on more code models.
Update #4953.
---
testsuites/sptests/spmisc01/init.c | 11 +--
testsuites/validation/tc-basedefs.c | 18 +++---
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
The availability of a proper RTEMS_DEFINE_GLOBAL_SYMBOL() implementation
depends on __asm__() and thus __GNUC__.
Clarify documentation.
Update #4953.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/score/basedefs.h | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 11.08.23 07:51, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11.08.23 07:40, Chris Johns wrote:
On 11/8/2023 3:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11.08.23 02:21, Chris Johns wrote:
On 10/8/2023 7:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Document that the build scripts in the testsuites produce a test
program.
I am
On 12.09.23 09:43, Chris Johns wrote:
Setting OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS and TEST_OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS through the configuration
file always worked.
Great. I am seeing:
OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS = -O2 -g -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections
and data sections is an optimisation however does it complicates
On 12/9/2023 5:32 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 12.09.23 08:49, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 12/9/2023 2:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 12.09.23 03:26, Chris Johns wrote:
On 11/9/2023 7:37 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Revert duplicated listing of TEST_OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS.
Thank
On 12.09.23 08:49, Chris Johns wrote:
On 12/9/2023 2:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 12.09.23 03:26, Chris Johns wrote:
On 11/9/2023 7:37 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Revert duplicated listing of TEST_OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS.
Thank you for picking this up.
Does this change let the user control
---
testsuites/sptests/sp37/init.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/sp37/init.c b/testsuites/sptests/sp37/init.c
index 2ee21b592e..e8af725a75 100644
--- a/testsuites/sptests/sp37/init.c
+++ b/testsuites/sptests/sp37/init.c
@@ -40,6 +40,8
On 12/9/2023 4:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 12.09.23 08:40, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 12/9/2023 4:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 27.07.23 13:33, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Prepare for RTEMS 6.1 release.
Update #4921.
>>> How do we want to proceed with the tools for the RTEMS
On 12/9/2023 2:15 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 12.09.23 03:26, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 11/9/2023 7:37 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Revert duplicated listing of TEST_OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS.
>> Thank you for picking this up.
>>
>> Does this change let the user control TEST_OPTIMIZATION_FLAGS and
On 12.09.23 08:40, Chris Johns wrote:
On 12/9/2023 4:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 27.07.23 13:33, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Prepare for RTEMS 6.1 release.
Update #4921.
How do we want to proceed with the tools for the RTEMS 6.1 release?
I need to move 6 to tar files but other tickets
On 27.07.23 13:33, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Prepare for RTEMS 6.1 release.
Update #4921.
How do we want to proceed with the tools for the RTEMS 6.1 release? Is
GCC 13.2 still the desired GCC release?
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email:
13 matches
Mail list logo