Re: [PATCH] c-user: fix broken definition in rate-monotonic background.

2021-04-22 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 22/04/2021 17:21, Gedare Bloom wrote: Just formatting, but Sebastian works in this area right now, so maybe he can pluck it or ACK a push is ok. I noticed it while reviewing his doc generation patches. Thanks, I checked it in. The generated files are the introduction.rst and the

Re: [PATCH] c-user: fix broken definition in rate-monotonic background.

2021-04-22 Thread Gedare Bloom
Just formatting, but Sebastian works in this area right now, so maybe he can pluck it or ACK a push is ok. I noticed it while reviewing his doc generation patches. On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 9:12 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > If that's just a formatting error fix, looks good. Push it. > > If it's

Re: [PATCH] c-user: fix broken definition in rate-monotonic background.

2021-04-22 Thread Joel Sherrill
If that's just a formatting error fix, looks good. Push it. If it's more, poke me. On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 10:10 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > --- > c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst >

[PATCH] c-user: fix broken definition in rate-monotonic background.

2021-04-22 Thread Gedare Bloom
--- c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst b/c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst index 9ca7dff..c81af4e 100644 --- a/c-user/rate-monotonic/background.rst +++