Hello Gedare,
On Thursday 22 of September 2016 03:26:32 Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I only added a couple of very minor inline comments. Looks good, I
> think you can push directly no one else needs to re-read this
> BSP-specific stuff.
thanks much for reading that huge pieces.
I have corrected some t
I only added a couple of very minor inline comments. Looks good, I
think you can push directly no one else needs to re-read this
BSP-specific stuff.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I will try to read your GitHub diffs sometime this week.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016
I will try to read your GitHub diffs sometime this week.
Thanks
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Gedare,
>
> I have tried to update code according to your review.
> I have added even enabled/uncommented and added implementation
> for some more test. Especially ECC integ
Hello Gedare,
I have tried to update code according to your review.
I have added even enabled/uncommented and added implementation
for some more test. Especially ECC integrated TCRAM single errors
correction and reporting test. I have commented why double errors
abort exception based test is comme
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Gedare,
>
> On Wednesday 14 of September 2016 02:13:47 Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
>> > Hello Gedare,
>> >
>> > thanks for the review. It is huge piece and not in a state
>> > as nice as I wou
Hello Gedare,
On Wednesday 14 of September 2016 02:13:47 Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> > Hello Gedare,
> >
> > thanks for the review. It is huge piece and not in a state
> > as nice as I would like it.
> >
> > On Tuesday 13 of September 2016 21:42:48 G
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Gedare,
>
> thanks for the review. It is huge piece and not in a state
> as nice as I would like it.
>
> On Tuesday 13 of September 2016 21:42:48 Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> I'm slowly reading through these. Is there a doc or is it worth it to
Hello Gedare,
thanks for the review. It is huge piece and not in a state
as nice as I would like it.
On Tuesday 13 of September 2016 21:42:48 Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I'm slowly reading through these. Is there a doc or is it worth it to
> generate one that maps the HalcoGen functions to their RTEMS
I'm slowly reading through these. Is there a doc or is it worth it to
generate one that maps the HalcoGen functions to their RTEMS renamed
versions? I'm not sure if it is of much value.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:47 PM, wrote:
> From: Pavel Pisa
>
> The code introduces initialization algorithms
From: Pavel Pisa
The code introduces initialization algorithms bases on Ti HalCoGen
generated files. The most of the code has been rewritten to use
RTEMS much more complete header files. This allowed to replace most
of the hardcoded hexadecimal values by appropriate fields macros documenting
how
10 matches
Mail list logo
