OK Sebastian, Thank you very much!
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
On 2014-07-10 16:43, Gabriel Ibarra wrote:
Hello, I'm working with a board with a few amount of RAM (lpc1768- 32k), I
recently updated the last version of RTEMS
On 7/10/2014 9:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-07-10 16:43, Gabriel Ibarra wrote:
Hello, I'm working with a board with a few amount of RAM (lpc1768- 32k), I
recently updated the last version of RTEMS and now I have more overhead, I
found that the responsible of this new overhead is an
From: Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com
---
IGNORE ME
--
1.7.1
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Use of the cenable command was resulting in a lock in
rtems_interrupt_lock_acquire due to nesting.
---
cpukit/libmisc/capture/capture.c | 39 ++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/capture/capture.c
---
testsuites/libtests/Makefile.am | 1 +
testsuites/libtests/capture01/Makefile.am | 20 +++
testsuites/libtests/capture01/capture01.doc | 19 +++
testsuites/libtests/capture01/capture01.scn | 35
testsuites/libtests/capture01/init.c| 253
On 10/07/2014 6:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Jennifer,
I am about to go on vacation so I can only give some short comments.
Have fun.
This patch looks a bit like approach of the Timeline Tool from Edisoft:
http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/users/2007-October/017112.html
I am more
