Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:27 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:12 AM Chris Johns wrote: >> >> >> > On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber >> > wrote: >> > >> > On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: >> > >> >>> On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On

Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Add expected-fail to psim

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:12 AM Chris Johns wrote: > > > > On 6 May 2020, at 8:15 pm, Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > > > > On 06/05/2020 12:00, Chris Johns wrote: > > > >>> On 6/5/20 7:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/05/2020 10:41, chr...@rtems.org wrote: > >>> > From: Chris Johns

Re: Odd Behavior on Cygwin

On 8/5/20 11:14 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:49 AM Chris Johns > wrote: On 6/5/20 3:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I have a test sweep going on Cygwin and there are a couple of oddities I > would like some advice on: > >

Re: Adding fenv support for ARM

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:33 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > Hello everyone, > This the tread to discuss adding fenv support for ARM architecture in > newlib. > > Link to previous thread: > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-March/058473.html > > ---FreeBSD Source > #

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 9:34 AM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > > On 08/05/2020 17:26, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 11:43 AM Christian Mauderer > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On 07/05/2020 17:19, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > On Thu,

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On 08/05/2020 17:26, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 11:43 AM Christian Mauderer > > wrote: > > > On 07/05/2020 17:19, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:07 PM Sebastian Huber > >

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 11:43 AM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > On 07/05/2020 17:19, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:07 PM Sebastian Huber > > > > wrote: > > > > On 07/05/2020 12:28, Niteesh

Re: Odd Behavior on Cygwin

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 12:49 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 6/5/20 3:46 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I have a test sweep going on Cygwin and there are a couple of oddities I > > would like some advice on: > > > > 1. It appears that the same command I used on Linux and FreeBSD is not > > managing to

Re: [PATCH] libtests/tar01: Remove files of tar01.tar archive

A $ find -type l returns nothing in my Git branch with this patch. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[PATCH] libtests/tar01: Remove files of tar01.tar archive

Update #3968. --- testsuites/libtests/tar01/home/abc/def/test_script | 2 -- testsuites/libtests/tar01/home/test_file | 2 -- testsuites/libtests/tar01/symlink | 1 - 3 files changed, 5 deletions(-) delete mode 100755 testsuites/libtests/tar01/home/abc/def/test_script

Re: Symlink still in m2005-2

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 8:00 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 08/05/2020 14:55, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > Not sure how this didn't get resolved since Sebastian posted a patch > > which appeared to resolve this. But the tar file still has a simlink > > and won't

Re: Symlink still in m2005-2

On 08/05/2020 14:55, Joel Sherrill wrote: Not sure how this didn't get resolved since Sebastian posted a patch which appeared to resolve this. But the tar file still has a simlink and won't untar on mingw Sorry, it seems I only added the archive and forgot to remove the files of the archive.

Symlink still in m2005-2

Hi Not sure how this didn't get resolved since Sebastian posted a patch which appeared to resolve this. But the tar file still has a simlink and won't untar on mingw jrs007@JRS-OAR-Laptop MINGW64 ~/rtems-cron-5.0.0-m2005-2 $ tar tvf rtems-5.0.0-m2005-2.tar.xz | grep "\->" lrwxr-xr-x chris/1010

Re: RTEMS Release Snapshot 5.0.0-m2005-2

Hello, I wanted to test the snapshot, but the following link: https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/5/5.0.0/5.0.0-m2005-2/ contains broken references. For example, the Quick Guide: https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/5/5.0.0/5.0.0-m2005-2/docs/rtems-docs-5.0.0-m2005-2-user.pdf

RTEMS Release Snapshot 5.0.0-m2005-2

Hello, I have uploaded release snapshot 5.0.0-m2005-2. The path is: https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/releases/5/5.0.0/5.0.0-m2005-2/ I hope this is the last snapshot before we branch for the RTEMS 5 release. Please download, test and report any issues. New to this snapshot are HTML release

Re: [PATCH rtems_waf] rtems: Add uninstall option to the list of commands

On Fri, May 8, 2020, 4:54 AM Chris Johns wrote: > On 8/5/20 4:50 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 4:13 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > I added support in rtems_waf to test the uninstall function, following > > the approach that you suggested. I'm attaching

Test threaded log module for rtems-tools

Hello, This is a test patch of a threading logger. My testing with qemu on a multi-core box gave me an average time of 800msec with a number of timeouts for the xilinx_zynq_a9_qemu BSP. I will try this code in the RSB to see if it works there. Anders, have a look as a possible start of a

[PATCH] rtemstoolkit: Rework the log locking adding an output thread.

From: Chris Johns --- rtemstoolkit/log.py | 76 + 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/log.py b/rtemstoolkit/log.py index 00fdb05..2e73e72 100755 --- a/rtemstoolkit/log.py +++ b/rtemstoolkit/log.py @@ -34,8

Re: [PATCH] networking: Increase _SYS_MBUF_LEGACY_MSIZE to 256 to match FreeBSD

On 8/5/20 3:15 pm, Hesham Almatary wrote: I am not gonna push this patch. I have only tried to run loopback and telnetd on rv64. Even though loopback doesn't make RTEMS exit with a failure, but the scn output doesn't look right (compared to riscv32). telnetd scn is identical and succeed on both,

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Source Builder: Fix UnicodeDecodeError build hang

On 8/5/20 4:22 pm, Anders Montonen wrote: On 8 May 2020, at 9:12, Chris Johns > wrote: On 8/5/20 3:50 pm, Anders Montonen wrote: On a not completely unrelated note, have there been any thoughts about setting a timetable for deprecating Python 2 support now that it is

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Source Builder: Fix UnicodeDecodeError build hang

On 8 May 2020, at 9:12, Chris Johns wrote: > On 8/5/20 3:50 pm, Anders Montonen wrote: > >> On a not completely unrelated note, have there been any thoughts about >> setting a timetable for deprecating Python 2 support now that it is EOL, eg. >> in RTEMS6? Are there any specific host platforms

Re: GSoC 2020: Implementation of OFW functions

On 07/05/2020 17:19, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:07 PM Sebastian Huber > > wrote: > > On 07/05/2020 12:28, Niteesh G. S. wrote: > > > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:21 PM Sebastian Huber > >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Source Builder: Fix UnicodeDecodeError build hang

On 8/5/20 3:50 pm, Anders Montonen wrote: On 8 May 2020, at 7:36, Chris Johns wrote: On 8/5/20 2:27 pm, Anders Montonen wrote: Hi, On 7 May 2020, at 5:10, Chris Johns wrote: On 7/5/20 9:37 am, Anders Montonen wrote: This patch fixes the UnicodeDecodeError that randomly caused source