On 30/9/2022 3:33 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Am 30.09.22 um 05:49 schrieb Chris Johns:
>> On 29/9/2022 9:50 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> On 29/9/22 9:45 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
Hello Chris,
thanks for the quick patch. With this qemu and microblaze work again like
Am 30.09.22 um 05:49 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 29/9/2022 9:50 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
On 29/9/22 9:45 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
Hello Chris,
thanks for the quick patch. With this qemu and microblaze work again like
expected.
I tested all tools starting with devel/* and from the ones that
On 29/9/2022 9:50 pm, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 29/9/22 9:45 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
>> Hello Chris,
>>
>> thanks for the quick patch. With this qemu and microblaze work again like
>> expected.
>>
>> I tested all tools starting with devel/* and from the ones that work only
>>
On 30/9/22 4:00 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I'd like to propose that short term we change lwip main to master for
> consistency with existing repos. This helps avoid stupid mistakes because lwip
> is the odd case.
I propose we use devel. I prefer it over main.
When should we change away from
On 29/9/22 11:24 pm, Kinsey Moore wrote:
> On 9/28/2022 19:03, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 29/9/2022 7:13 am, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>>> This allows any builds targeting an installed RTEMS BSP to override
>>> headers in the installed BSP reliably, including headers previously
>>> installed by that or
Hi
I've been bitten twice no because lwip uses main instead of master.
Although I am not offended by having the trunk be named master, I
understand others do care.
I'd like to propose that short term we change lwip main to master for
consistency with existing repos. This helps avoid stupid
Hi Padmarao,Could you try this patch on your Polarfire board? It works on the generic QEMU BSP and the BSP I am working on which uses the FRDME310ARTY/SiFive UART. It builds with the Polarfire BSP, but I am not able to test it. I downloaded and built QEMU that has Polarfire support, but I need to
This fixes a problem with parsing the FDT compatible property by
replacing the RISCV_CONSOLE_IS_COMPATIBLE macro with calls to
the fdt_stringlist_contains function. The macro only works when
the compatible FDT entry is a single string and not a list of
strings. The new call will compare each item
On 9/28/2022 19:03, Chris Johns wrote:
On 29/9/2022 7:13 am, Kinsey Moore wrote:
This allows any builds targeting an installed RTEMS BSP to override
headers in the installed BSP reliably, including headers previously
installed by that or other builds. This includes applications, network
stacks,
Hello Chris,
I reviewed this patch and I also tested it in the environment which made
problems earlier. The UnicodeDecodeError disappeared. This patch is fine
for me.
Many tanks for fix this issue.
Frank
On 9/29/22 12:59, chr...@rtems.org wrote:
From: Chris Johns
Update #4726
---
On 29/9/22 9:45 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> thanks for the quick patch. With this qemu and microblaze work again like
> expected.
>
> I tested all tools starting with devel/* and from the ones that work only
> devel/autotools-internal didn't generate a tar archive. But that
Hello Chris,
thanks for the quick patch. With this qemu and microblaze work again
like expected.
I tested all tools starting with devel/* and from the ones that work
only devel/autotools-internal didn't generate a tar archive. But that
one has a comment "Do not use via the command line" in
From: Chris Johns
Update #4726
---
source-builder/sb/execute.py | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/source-builder/sb/execute.py b/source-builder/sb/execute.py
index 3db9abc..bdab373 100755
--- a/source-builder/sb/execute.py
+++ b/source-builder/sb/execute.py
From: Chris Johns
---
source-builder/sb/version.py | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/source-builder/sb/version.py b/source-builder/sb/version.py
index 29d2dc5..4ec7cfa 100644
--- a/source-builder/sb/version.py
+++ b/source-builder/sb/version.py
@@
From: Chris Johns
Closes #4730
---
source-builder/sb/setbuilder.py | 22 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/source-builder/sb/setbuilder.py b/source-builder/sb/setbuilder.py
index 3e16111..5921eed 100644
--- a/source-builder/sb/setbuilder.py
On 29/9/22 6:01 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Am 29.09.22 um 09:52 schrieb Chris Johns:
>>
>>
>> On 29/9/22 5:13 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
>>> Am 29.09.22 um 08:56 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 29/9/2022 4:55 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Am 29.09.22 um 08:54 schrieb Chris Johns:
>>
Am 29.09.22 um 09:52 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 29/9/22 5:13 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
Am 29.09.22 um 08:56 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 29/9/2022 4:55 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
Am 29.09.22 um 08:54 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 29/9/2022 4:42 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
It could be a bug if
On 29/9/22 5:13 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Am 29.09.22 um 08:56 schrieb Chris Johns:
>> On 29/9/2022 4:55 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
>>> Am 29.09.22 um 08:54 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 29/9/2022 4:42 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
>> It could be a bug if the tools builds work, ie
Am 29.09.22 um 08:56 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 29/9/2022 4:55 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
Am 29.09.22 um 08:54 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 29/9/2022 4:42 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
It could be a bug if the tools builds work, ie 6/rtems-*. Please raise a
ticket?
The tool builds work except
On 29/9/2022 4:55 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Am 29.09.22 um 08:54 schrieb Chris Johns:
>> On 29/9/2022 4:42 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
It could be a bug if the tools builds work, ie 6/rtems-*. Please raise a
ticket?
>>>
>>> The tool builds work except for the 6/rtems-microblaze.
Am 29.09.22 um 08:54 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 29/9/2022 4:42 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
It could be a bug if the tools builds work, ie 6/rtems-*. Please raise a ticket?
The tool builds work except for the 6/rtems-microblaze.
Thanks, I will take a look.
I just checked it: There is the
On 29/9/2022 4:42 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
>> It could be a bug if the tools builds work, ie 6/rtems-*. Please raise a
>> ticket?
>
> The tool builds work except for the 6/rtems-microblaze.
Thanks, I will take a look.
Chris
___
devel mailing
Hello Chris,
thanks for the response.
Am 29.09.22 um 01:40 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 28/9/2022 11:42 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
Hello,
with this patch, I don't get a tar for devel/qemu and for the 6/rtems-microblaze
anymore. All other 6/rtems-* toolchains work without problems. I haven't
23 matches
Mail list logo
