Re: Change build specification files from YAML to JSON?

On 27.04.23 00:47, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 3:58 PM Gedare Bloom > wrote: Is the result of this discussion to use CSafeLoader for now? Or do we still debate the transition to JSON? I see some quirks need to be dealt with as you

Re: [PATCH 2/5] build: Use CSafeLoader if available

On 27.04.23 20:27, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:46 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: On 27.04.23 02:11, Chris Johns wrote: On 26/4/2023 6:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: The CSafeLoader uses the C libyaml libary to considerably speed up the loading of YAML files. No from me.

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 27.04.23 20:05, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas wrote: On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: Why don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS Project? I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an open-source

Re: Change build specification files from YAML to JSON?

On 26/4/2023 6:22 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 26.04.23 01:52, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 25/4/2023 5:35 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Tooling makes sense if you have a high change rate. >> >> That is not the use case I am discussing and it is not a factor. >> >>> This is not the case for the

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 28/4/2023 4:05 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas wrote: >> On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Why >>> don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS >>> Project? >> >> I don't know, but certainly github.com is not

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 7:06 PM Chris Johns wrote: > Hi, > > All RSB repo commits need to be posted for review and independent approval > given > before being pushed to the top level repo. > I thought this was the policy for all top level repositories. There is a degree of trust on any posted

Re: [PATCH 2/5] build: Use CSafeLoader if available

On 28/4/2023 4:27 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:46 PM Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 27.04.23 02:11, Chris Johns wrote: >>> On 26/4/2023 6:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: The CSafeLoader uses the C libyaml libary to considerably speed up the loading of YAML

Re: [PATCH 2/5] build: Use CSafeLoader if available

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:46 PM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 27.04.23 02:11, Chris Johns wrote: > > On 26/4/2023 6:04 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> The CSafeLoader uses the C libyaml libary to considerably speed up the > >> loading of YAML files. > > No from me. > > What do you mean with not

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:27 AM Karel Gardas wrote: > > On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Why > > don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS > > Project? > > I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an > open-source solution which may be

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 4/27/23 08:13, Sebastian Huber wrote: Why don't we use a Git pull request workflow with CI pipelines in the RTEMS Project? I don't know, but certainly github.com is not available as an open-source solution which may be seen as a major roadblock. Am I right assuming that GitLab Community

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

On 27/4/2023 4:13 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > what is your (or the RTEMS Project in general) plan to maintain the tools and > ensure that we can use up to date versions of Newlib, GCC, Binutils, and GDB? > This involves building the latest versions, reviewing build issues, reporting > bugs,

Re: RSB repo commits need approval

Hello Chris, what is your (or the RTEMS Project in general) plan to maintain the tools and ensure that we can use up to date versions of Newlib, GCC, Binutils, and GDB? This involves building the latest versions, reviewing build issues, reporting bugs, writing patches, etc. Currently, I do