Re: [RSB 1/4] 6/7: Update Newlib

Hello Chris, On 28.06.23 04:39, Chris Johns wrote: What has changed in this version? Is there anything specific we need to know about or need? this update has no specific reason. -- embedded brains GmbH Herr Sebastian HUBER Dornierstr. 4 82178 Puchheim Germany email:

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] c-user: Update references to rtems_task_wake_after

On 27.06.23 23:37, Kinsey Moore wrote: >   This directive blocks the calling task for the specified ``ticks`` of clock >   ticks if the value is not equal to :c:macro:`RTEMS_YIELD_PROCESSOR`.  When the > -requested interval has elapsed, the task is made ready.  The

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] c-user: Update references to rtems_task_wake_after

On 28.06.23 01:07, Chris Johns wrote: On 28/6/2023 7:37 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 4:05 PM Sebastian Huber mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote: On 27.06.23 22:18, Kinsey Moore wrote: > diff --git a/c-user/task/directives.rst

Re: [RSB 2/4] 6: Update GCC 10 and 12

On 28.06.23 04:37, Chris Johns wrote: Can you please provide something other than update in the commit message? If it is to pick up patches on these gcc release branches then please say so. This update has no particular reason. I just had a bit of time to run my update script. Ideally there

Re: [PATCH rtems-tools] tester/rtems: add renode implementation

Hi Joel and Chris, Yes, and I will be working on the rsb patch for renode installation next. Regards, Mazaya On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:34 PM Chris Johns wrote: > I am as well > > Chris > > On 28/6/2023 12:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I'm OK with this patch. > > > > Is it assuming that you

Re: [RSB 1/4] 6/7: Update Newlib

Hi, What has changed in this version? Is there anything specific we need to know about or need? Thanks Chris On 27/6/2023 8:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > --- > rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- > rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-10.4-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- >

Re: [RSB 2/4] 6: Update GCC 10 and 12

Can you please provide something other than update in the commit message? If it is to pick up patches on these gcc release branches then please say so. Are these versions of the compiler tracking tarfile packages? Thanks Chris On 27/6/2023 8:21 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > --- >

Re: [PATCH rtems-tools] tester/rtems: add renode implementation

I am as well Chris On 28/6/2023 12:25 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I'm OK with this patch. > > Is it assuming that you installed renode on your own -- not using the RSB? > > --joel > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:37 PM Muhammad Sulthan Mazaya > mailto:msulthanmaz...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd] freebsd/if_cgem: Remove QEMU workaround

This looks good. Thanks Chris On 28/6/2023 1:30 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > Note that this patch is for 6-freebsd-12 and its removal reduces the burden to > make the master branch match functionality. > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:28 AM Kinsey Moore > wrote: >

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] c-user: Update references to rtems_task_wake_after

On 28/6/2023 7:37 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 4:05 PM Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > > On 27.06.23 22:18, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > diff --git a/c-user/task/directives.rst b/c-user/task/directives.rst > > index

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] c-user: Update references to rtems_task_wake_after

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 4:05 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 27.06.23 22:18, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > diff --git a/c-user/task/directives.rst b/c-user/task/directives.rst > > index c082b51..3334679 100644 > > --- a/c-user/task/directives.rst > > +++

Re: [PATCH rtems-docs] c-user: Update references to rtems_task_wake_after

On 27.06.23 22:18, Kinsey Moore wrote: diff --git a/c-user/task/directives.rst b/c-user/task/directives.rst index c082b51..3334679 100644 --- a/c-user/task/directives.rst +++ b/c-user/task/directives.rst @@ -1475,15 +1475,15 @@ The following constraints apply to this directive: \clearpage

[PATCH rtems-docs] c-user: Update references to rtems_task_wake_after

rtems_task_wake_after takes a parameter in terms of ticks and not any time base. This updates documentation to reflect that and refers any applications needing a time base to nanosleep or clock_nanosleep. Closes #4772 --- c-user/scheduling-concepts/background.rst | 6 +++---

[PATCH rtems-lwip] Alter ownership of components in uLan

This commit breaks up the uLan directory and removes its ORIGIN and COPYING metadata in favor of this repository being the authoritative source of these sources as per the wishes of the originator of these files. More information can be found here:

Re: doctest rtems example

I was testing the out of box version of gtest. It does not support parsing arguments more than once. I think you have to load / unload the library between runs. I would really prefer to use google test. Its what most of our tests are already in, and has support for utbot.org Sam On Sun, Jun

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd] freebsd/if_cgem: Remove QEMU workaround

Note that this patch is for 6-freebsd-12 and its removal reduces the burden to make the master branch match functionality. On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:28 AM Kinsey Moore wrote: > This removes the workaround applied on the fly for QEMU that disables > priority queueing. The priority queue

[PATCH rtems-libbsd] freebsd/if_cgem: Remove QEMU workaround

This removes the workaround applied on the fly for QEMU that disables priority queueing. The priority queue interrupt was not previously hooked up properly in QEMU and RSB now has the patches to allow it to work. --- freebsd/sys/dev/cadence/if_cgem.c | 26 +++--- 1 file

Triage Meeting Thursday on Discord

Hi Chris, Kinsey, Andrei, and Vijay dug through the tickets for 6.1 and did some triage. I'd like to have another triage meeting this week in the hope that other people can attend. Sebastian and Gedare both have tickets for 6.1 and it would be good to cover those in person. We will try for

Re: [PATCH rtems-tools] tester/rtems: add renode implementation

I'm OK with this patch. Is it assuming that you installed renode on your own -- not using the RSB? --joel On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:37 PM Muhammad Sulthan Mazaya < msulthanmaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Yes they are the same. I thought there was an email error, so I re-send it >

[RSB 1/4] 6/7: Update Newlib

--- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-10.4-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-head-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

[RSB 2/4] 6: Update GCC 10 and 12

--- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-12-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-10-newlib-head.cfg index

[RSB 3/4] 7: Update Binutils, GDB, and GCC

--- rtems/config/tools/rtems-binutils-head.cfg| 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-head-newlib-head.cfg | 4 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-gdb-head.cfg | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-binutils-head.cfg

[RSB 4/4] tools: Add GCC 13 configuration

--- .../config/tools/rtems-gcc-13-newlib-head.cfg | 25 +++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) create mode 100644 rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-13-newlib-head.cfg diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-13-newlib-head.cfg b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-gcc-13-newlib-head.cfg new