On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
On 27/06/2014 4:09 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
See pc386/configure.ac for this
RTEMS_BSP_CLEANUP_OPTIONS(1, 1)
dnlargument 1 indicates the default value for BSP_PRESS_KEY_FOR_RESET
dnlargument 2 indicates the
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Jennifer Averett
jennifer.aver...@oarcorp.com wrote:
The attached patches are a starting point for discussions for adding capture
support
to core objects. We started to write notes based on our discussions but the
text
was harder to follow than just
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Hesham Moustafa
heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
This definitely sounds like not handling the context switch necessary
part of the
IRQ processing properly so always returning to
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Philipp Eppelt
philipp.epp...@mailbox.tu-dresden.de wrote:
---
This is an updated version of an earlier unmerged patch, which extends the
cpukit/score/cpu/i386/ model with guards to distinguish between
paravirtualized (--enable-paravirt) and native
Either account for it in workspace sizing or use malloc.
On principle, I guess any dynamic allocated memory that isn't mandatory to
get RTEMS to work should come from malloc.
-Gedare
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Jennifer Averett
jennifer.aver...@oarcorp.com wrote:
The capture engine
One issue with rbtree formatting is in some places if/while conditional
expressions are put on the same line as the conditional statement. We
should prefer to put them explicitly on separate lines, since that is the
prevailing style of score and I have added such a convention to our style
wiki
/2014 10:23 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
/* TODO: Error message? */
- if (!the_rbtree) return;
+ if ( !the_rbtree ) return;
Like here.
Ok, this is not an uncrustify bug. It was already a one-liner (like the
other). Unfortunately there is no option to wipe out one-liner.
I found
Hi Ben,
Great work. I have a few comments. I skipped the i2c.h and i2c.c
files. Most of my comments are about style and a few requests to
refactor some of the larger files. The refactoring can be added to
your TODO if you like. Please fix the style issues if it is not a
burden.
+++
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Hesham Moustafa heshamelmat...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have read about MMU and Caches in OpenRISC to start implementing
related managers in the new or1k port. Before beginning to write the
code, I would like to introduce some of the architecture details
Thanks, two style comments below.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
---
cpukit/libblock/src/bdbuf.c| 4 +-
cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/keyimpl.h | 3 ++
cpukit/posix/src/key.c
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Hesham ALMatary
heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
This work is based on the old or32 port (that has been removed back in 2005)
authored by Chris Ziomkowski. The patch includes the basic functions every
port should implement like: context switch, exception
OK from me.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Hesham ALMatary
heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
This work is based on the old or32 port (that has been
removed back in 2005) authored by Chris Ziomkowski. The patch includes the
basic functions every port should implement like: context switch,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 8/13/2014 3:28 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about not responding before now. It had dropped of my list and I
had forgotten about it.
On 12/08/2014 9:58 pm, Krzysztof Mięsowicz wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
On 14/08/2014 6:58 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
We need to decide if we want 1 repo per tool or a consolidated tools
repo. My opinion is to add the rtl-host and rtems-coverage as
git-submodules within another repo the project
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Pavel Pisa p...@cmp.felk.cvut.cz wrote:
Hello Sebastian,
On Thursday 14 of August 2014 10:07:06 Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 14/08/14 09:48, Pavel Pisa wrote:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch
If you're using git for your development, you can use 'git
format-patch' to convert a set of commits into a set of patches. Some
properly formatted git patches can make it easier to review and merge
your code. Some other notes follow.
virtualpok_arinc653.patch:
* it seems the only part of this
.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
Hi Ben,
Great work. I have a few comments. I skipped the i2c.h and i2c.c
files. Most of my comments are about style and a few requests to
refactor some of the larger files. The refactoring can be added to
your TODO if you
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 8/22/2014 9:38 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Looks like this function needs a guard on #if
defined(CPU_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_ALIGNMENT)
see rtems_cache_invalidate_multiple_instruction_lines
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
Update documentation.
---
cpukit/rtems/Makefile.am| 1 -
cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/clock.h| 14 +--
cpukit/rtems/src/clockgettickssinceboot.c | 31
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. Just
for API review.
---
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/csb337/startup/bspreset.c | 1 +
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/raspberrypi/Makefile.am | 2 +-
.../lib/libbsp/arm
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 9/4/2014 11:19 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
---
cpukit/posix/src/mprotect.c | 23 ++-
1 file changed, 14
See tester in rtems-tools.git it is designed for exactly what you ask. You
probably need to modify an existing script to run or1ksim.
On Sep 6, 2014 2:58 PM, Hesham Moustafa heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Given that I am able to run qemu-or1k from sim-scripts (I will push
the script
OK to commit these 3 from me.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Hesham ALMatary
heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
or1ksim simulator built from RSB that builds from latest or1ksim/github repo
generates or1k-elf-sim executable and not or32-elf-sim anymore.
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/or1ksim/README
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Gedare.. cc'ed you for help in spotting an empty rbtree
in gdb. See below.
On 9/16/2014 2:45 PM, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
Breakpoint 2, 0x0600 in _unalign ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0600 in _unalign ()
#1
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Chris Nott chr...@vl.com.au wrote:
Interrupts working yes.
No I don't mind. It's a bit of a mess though, I was in the process of doing
another cleaner USB device implementation for BeagleBone Black, which I was
then going to backport to STM32F4 and eventually
Thanks Chris. If you have any ideas on useful ways to visualize these
traces, I think it could make a good open project for a student.
-Gedare
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
Hello,
I have pushed updates to rtems-tld to rtems-tools.git plus changes to
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
The code is m68k and the comment is PowerPC.
Any guidance for the porting guide on what constitutes too expensive? There
should be some general guidelines regarding when to pick a format bases on
that.
Also..
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
Module:rtems
Branch:master
Commit:56ed56a641b69be42f5a38046307b33096014c84
Changeset:
http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=56ed56a641b69be42f5a38046307b33096014c84
Author:Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org
Just a comment, is there already code in the filesystem path
evaluation that implements similar functionality? Would it make sense
to replace with a call to this?
-Gedare
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
---
cpukit/libcsupport/Makefile.am| 2 +-
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/v850/gdbv850sim/console/console-io.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/v850/gdbv850sim/console/console-io.c
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/shared/abort/abort.c | 44
+++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/shared/abort/abort.c
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
---
testsuites/samples/unlimited/init.c | 23 ++-
testsuites/samples/unlimited/system.h | 2 +-
testsuites/samples/unlimited/test1.c | 2 +-
testsuites/samples/unlimited/test2.c | 28
Just one note, I prefer to see addresses cast to uintptr_t.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Hesham ALMatary
heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
---
c/src/lib/libcpu/or1k/shared/cache/cache.c | 16
c/src/lib/libcpu/or1k/shared/cache/cache_.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 9
Hi,
I have pushed some commits to fix sparc64-specific warnings. The
remaining warnings that are only seen on sparc64 builds are caused by
64-bit problems mostly related to integer/pointer conversions. I don't
have the time to hunt all these down myself. Most of them are in
jffs2, capture, or
---
cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-rtems-dev.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-rtems-dev.c
b/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-rtems-dev.c
index 28e4739..48a6737 100644
--- a/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-rtems-dev.c
+++
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On October 13, 2014 9:46:50 PM CDT, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
---
cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-rtems-dev.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs
This fixes a warning about conversion to int without a cast.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
---
cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-rtems.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-rtems.c
b/cpukit
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
On 13/10/14 17:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 10/13/2014 10:43 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 10/13/2014 05:18 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
NOTE: For defaults for weak symbols, I am just adding
a prototype
I did not commit this one, because it has the problem of assuming
uintptr_t is at least 32-bits wide.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On October 13, 2014 9:46:50 PM CDT
Committed, thanks.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Jan Dolezal dolez...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
prevents possible mkdir and cd error when parents of build
directory are missing
---
do_it | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/do_it b/do_it
index
Cache manager implementations are a perennial open project.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 10/20/2014 10:08 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 20/10/14 16:58, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On October 20, 2014 9:41:57 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber
What does it mean as far as possible?
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
Implement ctime and mtime updates according to POSIX as far as possible.
The ctime is mapped to the FAT create time and date. The mtime is
mapped to the FAT last
If you do the legwork now, they could make reasonable GCI tasks if we
decide to participate and are accepted.
-Gedare
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 10/20/2014 12:09 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Cache manager implementations are a perennial open
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Pavel Pisa p...@cmp.felk.cvut.cz wrote:
Hello Gedare and others,
On Sunday 19 of October 2014 15:01:08 Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Pavel Pisa p...@control.felk.cvut.cz
...
set interpreter in RTEMS which would allow to run BIOS
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
On 14/10/14 04:21, Gedare Bloom wrote:
cpukit/libcsupport/src/__assert.c52:43:
warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
[-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
rtems_fatal( RTEMS_FATAL_SOURCE_ASSERT
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Peter Dufault dufa...@hda.com wrote:
On Oct 20, 2014, at 16:47 , Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
However, should unimplemented versions return an error instead of being
a NOP? That would force one to visit code that makes assumptions.
If this
We might consider removing the cache manager in favor of making dcache
flush/invalidate and icache invalidate lines part of the score/cpu
port (are they the same across cpu's in the same arch family?)
-Gedare
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Peter Dufault dufa...@hda.com wrote:
On Oct 23,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
On 23/10/14 19:41, Gedare Bloom wrote:
We might consider removing the cache manager in favor of making dcache
flush/invalidate and icache invalidate lines part of the score/cpu
port (are they the same
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Hesham Moustafa
heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com
wrote:
On October 27, 2014 3:04:26 AM PDT, Hesham Moustafa
heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
This year, I am studying MSc
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Hi
As Jennifer has reviewed the output from an SMP capture
test, it is clear that something which was no big deal in
the old fixed record uniprocessor version is now an issue.
Most extensions have an actor and
I missed reviewing this patch earlier, but there are some style
problems with it, please fix them on the head.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jennifer Averett jenni...@rtems.org wrote:
Module:rtems
Branch:master
Commit:6031da438d219c6ec5d9d48f1df2aef91710cce3
Changeset:
The email address came from VC, so it is a problem in the commit setup I guess.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
FWIW she is jennifer.aver...@rtems.org not jennifer@.
--joel
On 10/30/2014 9:53 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
I missed reviewing
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
On 29/10/14 22:49, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Very desirable
=
+ x86 context switch SMP handoff logic
For someone with good enough x86 assembly skills, this should be fairly
simple. You just
The problem may be a setup issue on git.rtems.org, where it converts
from user login to email, I think it might be doing something dumb
like just taking login-name @rtems.org
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 10/30/2014 9:55 AM, Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
Hi,
Libdl tests in the testsuite depend on tools in rtems-tools.git/linkers.
Should I raise a configure error if the tools are not found or not build the
tests ?
Raising an error is my preferred option because libdl for
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
Hi,
Libdl tests in the testsuite depend on tools in rtems-tools.git/linkers.
Should I raise a configure error if the tools are not found or not build
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
On 31/10/2014 6:42 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Chris Johns chr...@rtems.org wrote:
Hi,
Libdl tests in the testsuite
is so linux-only.
Stay tuned.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
Ben, As far as getting this merged, all of my comments can be done as
a follow-on commit. -Gedare
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Ben Gras b...@shrike-systems.com
wrote:
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Jennifer Averett
jennifer.aver...@oarcorp.com wrote:
---
cpukit/libmisc/cpuuse/cpuusagetop.c | 83
-
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/cpuuse/cpuusagetop.c
I was reviewing this code and lost my spot. There are some notes
below, but I have no more time to weed through. I'd recommend
splitting this patch into more pieces:
1) Moving code into capture_support.
2) Adding SMP support.
3) Fixing formatting/style/documentation issues in legacy portions.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On November 4, 2014 5:27:51 PM CST, Andre Marques
andre.lousa.marq...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/04/14 23:16, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 11/4/2014 5:01 PM, Andre Marques wrote:
Hi gedare,
will send a new version of
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
Hello,
I have a new item for the list:
Very desirable
==
+ Since red-black trees are now used to implement the priority queues and
they will play an important part in future SMP
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
On 06/11/14 13:42, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I think it is preferable to turn this top test into a
non-interactive test.
Have you run it?
There is no way to automate checking the output.
In theory you
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Pavel Pisa ppisa4li...@pikron.com wrote:
On Thursday 06 of November 2014 14:57:18 Gedare Bloom wrote:
Pavel posted about a generic tree framework:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.rtems.devel/1327
I had some trouble getting inlining to work in the way
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Alan Cudmore alan.cudm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/5/2014 9:39 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 05/11/14 15:35, Alan Cudmore wrote:
If the ARM BSPs that do not use the shared start.S include the code, but
never
call it, I can remove it, if that is what is best.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Ralf Corsepius
ralf.corsep...@rtems.org wrote:
On 11/10/2014 06:11 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
While at the GSOC Mentor Summit, I heard a story from another
organization about some inappropriate behavior by someone.
They were fairly easily able to deal with this
Are there still tests for when the lock would be held despite the
context switch? Just want to make sure we're not removing some
test-case.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Jennifer Averett
jennifer.aver...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Change semaphore attributes to resolve problem where semaphore is not
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jan Dolezal dolez...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/pc386/Makefile.am | 1 +
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/pc386/configure.ac | 5 +
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/pc386/include/bsp.h | 6 ++
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jan Dolezal dolez...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/pc386/Makefile.am| 2 +
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/pc386/preinstall.am | 4 +
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/shared/int16/int16.c | 397
+
Just a couple high-level comments:
Is this code entirely written by you?
If the code is i386-specific, I'd like to see it put into i386 namespace.
The use of bitfields worries me, especially if the code might be
ported to other architectures. I can see now why you put __packed__ on
all your
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jan Dolezal dolez...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/pc386/Makefile.am | 5 +
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/pc386/configure.ac | 13 +
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/pc386/console/fb_vesa_rm.c | 851
+++
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Pavel Pisa p...@cmp.felk.cvut.cz wrote:
Hello Gedare,
the first thanks much for fast and valuable review.
I expect that Jan Dolezal prepares new patch series
next week (or two in the worst case).
On Wednesday 12 of November 2014 17:04:04 Gedare Bloom wrote
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Pavel Pisa p...@cmp.felk.cvut.cz wrote:
Hello Gedare and others,
On Wednesday 12 of November 2014 16:54:07 Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jan Dolezal dolez...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/pc386/Makefile.am| 2
The test case name SHA 1 is misleading, as there exists a SHA-1 algorithm
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
---
cpukit/Makefile.am| 2 -
cpukit/libmd/Makefile.am | 13 +-
cpukit/libmd/preinstall.am
Could you briefly explain a bit more context about the goals for
implementing access control? That is, is it for compliance to some
standard, to address a security need, or something else?
Thanks,
Gedare
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Sebastian Huber
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Jan Dolezal dolez...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
Hello Gedare,
thank you very much for fast and valuable response.
I made most of the changes you suggested.
On 12.11.2014 16:20, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jan Dolezal dolez
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Jan Dolezal dolez...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On 12.11.2014 16:42, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Jan Dolezal dolez...@fel.cvut.cz
wrote:
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/i386/shared/irq/idt.c | 147
+
c/src/lib
This one needs a release note as it may impede some applications if
they assumed they could use these trap vectors.
Also, do these changes complicate the paravirtualization efforts done
with sparc32 for xtratum?
Otherwise, quick skim of the patch series looked good.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at
Hi Ben,
Due to the license change, we can consider our version of Mongoose as
RTEMS Project maintained for now. I don't know if anyone is
maintaining a fork with an appropriate license.
Moving the struct definitions to the header file is sensible, although
the usual caveat is that users might
Is this the same one that Chris has had in use before? (I think that
is who had one in use..)
-Gedare
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
* Makefile.am updated and preinstall.am regenerated.
* mprotect.c had a prototype removed now
wrote:
On 11/19/2014 1:24 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Hi Ben,
Due to the license change, we can consider our version of Mongoose as
RTEMS Project maintained for now. I don't know if anyone is
maintaining a fork with an appropriate license.
There is a fork with the appropriate license.
https
OK great
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On 11/19/2014 2:55 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
Is this the same one that Chris has had in use before? (I think that
is who had one in use..)
Yes. You wanted it in rtems to avoid me having to add a prototype
I'd prefer to see it hidden behind a macro, like other
compiler-specific stuff (e.g. attributes). It could go in tmacros
also, since it should be restricted to testing.
I will oppose any #pragma within cpukit or c subdirectories.
-Gedare
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Joel Sherrill
I'm more concerned with the hard-coded cache alignment value, than I
am with the dead code.
-Gedare
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Hi
Coverity ID: 1255327
I think this looks like a legitimately flagged piece of code :
1537 * For
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
On November 19, 2014 8:34:23 PM CST, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
I'd prefer to see it hidden behind a macro, like other
compiler-specific stuff (e.g. attributes). It could go in tmacros
also, since
to Gedare Bloom and Pavel Pisa
Jan Dolezal (8):
i386/pc386: configurable size of descriptor tables
score: i386: functions converting real mode pointer to physical
address and back
i386: GDTR manipulation functions parameters changed to use explicit
width types
cpukit: basedefs
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Hi
https://devel.rtems.org/ is now up with our Trac instance.
As mentioned in a previous update, this merges Bugzilla and
Mediawiki. All the old content is there but it has likely moved
around. If you spot
It should be working now.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Cláudio Silva
claudiodcsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Password recovery is working correctly, but I can't access any patch
attached to a ticket. This feature seems to be broken.
Cláudio
On Thu Nov 20 2014 at 15:54:58 Joel Sherrill
I built a toolchain yesterday for sparc32. Check the build-log for the
error message, the tail of the make is insufficient information.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Hi
RSB report has:
make[1]: Leaving directory
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Chris, Gedate.. please fill in gaps.
On 11/21/2014 4:06 AM, Thomas Kim wrote:
Dear Joel,
I am sorry. please let me know how to download these patch codes(source
code, makefile.am, pre-install.am, etc) for
Hi,
TL;DR: Trac tickets are in a good state. We need to close or bump the
4.11 milestones before release. I'd like to discuss a proposal to
organize the Trac Tickets better.
One of the appeals of Trac is that it is simple.There are a six ways
I'd like to see our use of trac ticket management
Is this fixed?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:13 AM, RTEMS trac t...@rtems.org wrote:
#2175: C++ Exception Catch Handler Crash on Sparc ERC32 Simulator(SIS)
--+-
Reporter: jbkim | Owner: ralf.corsepius
Type: defect|
Daniel commit these if you agree with the assessment.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Jiri Gaisler j...@gaisler.se wrote:
Condition needs to be inverted, as a 1 in the mask register means
that the interrupt is enabled. Solves ticket #1959 in trac.
---
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
Hi
These appear to be easy to address. I would appreciate someone
addressing these:
i2c/eeprom.c:
221
1. Condition address_bytes 4, taking false branch
2. cond_at_most: Checking address_bytes 4 implies
In the future, please add more in the comment to explain for example
that the same variable initialization happens earlier. I had to go
look at the code to see why it was OK to delete this line.
-Gedare
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
From: Josh
To be clear, I meant the commit comment. Obviously don't add a source
comment about a deleted line.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Gedare Bloom ged...@rtems.org wrote:
In the future, please add more in the comment to explain for example
that the same variable initialization happens earlier
Again, I don't know why this is unecessary. Because str is never used?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
From: Josh Oguin josh.og...@oarcorp.com
This was flagged by CodeSonar.
---
cpukit/libcsupport/src/mount.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1
I did not look at this, but in general we should consider to relocate
the tools subdirectory to a different repo.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
From: Josh Oguin josh.og...@oarcorp.com
This code is built without warnings and ignored by Coverity
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Joel Sherrill
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote:
From: Josh Oguin josh.og...@oarcorp.com
This was flagged by CodeSonar. It should be impossible to get an
incorrect baud number back but ensure this in debug mode. The _Assert()
keeps their scanner from evaluating
1 - 100 of 3886 matches
Mail list logo
