Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] preparing for release

[Peter Korsgaard]

> "Waldemar" == Waldemar Brodkorb  writes:

 > Hi,
 > I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS
 > before doing it.

 > I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and
 > the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough.

 > Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default.

I agree. The size saving is really quite small. We did the same thing in
Buildroot last year.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
___
devel mailing list
devel@uclibc-ng.org
http://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [uclibc-ng-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 1/1] libpthread: Fix inclusion of unwind code.

[Waldemar Brodkorb]

Hi Ignacy,
Ignacy Gawędzki wrote,

> Since librt and libpthread are now integrated into libc, including
> unwind-resume and unwind-forcedunwind implementations of unwind code
> makes no sense.  Only unwind-forcedunwind is now included with
> functions hidden to avoid them overriding the ones from libgcc_s.

I tested the patch and I think I will push it in the next days.

Sorry that it took a while, but the removal of the test suite
took a while. Now the test suite is compiled as a normal software
package and not with the initial gcc. 
Therefore no regressions seen with your patch.

Any other news to the patch?

best regards
 Waldemar
___
devel mailing list
devel@uclibc-ng.org
http://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel