>>>>> "Waldemar" == Waldemar Brodkorb <[email protected]> writes:

 > Hi,
 > I am preparing a release and would like to remove UCLIBC_HAS_LFS
 > before doing it.

 > I believe UCLIBC_HAS_LFS does make the code more complex and
 > the benefit to disable it to save some bytes is not high enough.

 > Most users have UCLIBC_HAS_LFS enabled and it is enabled by default.

I agree. The size saving is really quite small. We did the same thing in
Buildroot last year.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclibc-ng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to