Re: Files with wrong exec bits set

2004-01-22 Thread Aidan Kehoe
Ar an 21ú lá de mí 1, scríobh Marc Aurele La France : The problem with this is that the permissions might be reset the next time something is committed to the affected files. So, all committers would need to re-checkout after the permission changes are made, or change the permissions in

Questions

2004-01-22 Thread Nicolas Pascoli
Hello, Now, I'm using XFree 4.3.x but this release don't support ati radeon 9200 with DRI (no hardware acceleration). This is a problem : I can't play to game which need this acceleration under Linux. Then, when XFree 4.4.x will be distibuted as a rpm package (else where can I found

Re: Questions

2004-01-22 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Nicolas Pascoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Now, I'm using XFree 4.3.x but this release don't support ati radeon 9200 with DRI (no hardware acceleration). This is a problem : I can't play to game which need this acceleration under Linux. Then, when XFree 4.4.x will be distibuted as

Cygwin/XFree86 Status?

2004-01-22 Thread Kendall Bennett
Hi Harold, What is the latest status on Cygwin/XFree86? I want to start working on a port of X to Windows, and figured I would start with Cygwin/X to see how that works. I really want to build this with Open Watcom, not GCC, but I don't know what the latest status is. Does the 4.3.0 tree build

RE: Questions

2004-01-22 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Shrei Rin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, I'm using XFree 4.3.x but this release don't support ati radeon 9200 with DRI (no hardware acceleration). This is a problem : I can't play to game which need this acceleration under Linux. Then, when XFree 4.4.x will be distibuted as a rpm

Debian

2004-01-22 Thread Marc Aurele La France
This came up while helping some clueless Windows exile(e): So, how come Debian stable is still at XFree86 4.1? Marc. +--+---+ | Marc Aurele La France | work: 1-780-492-9310 | | Computing and Network

Re: Debian

2004-01-22 Thread Michael Taylor
Marc Aurele La France wrote: This came up while helping some clueless Windows exile(e): So, how come Debian stable is still at XFree86 4.1? Because that is what they had in 'testing' when they released Debian 3.0r0 (woody) back in July 2002. Currently their 'testing' aka sarge has XFree86

cannot find -lfl

2004-01-22 Thread Suresh Chandra Mannava
Dear Friends, I am encountering the following error while Installing the build of XFree86 TinyX. I cross compiled X with Abacus compiler (India build processor) make[3]: Entering directory `/home/suresh/xfree/build/programs/xgc' rm -f xgc /usr/abacus-linux-uclibc/bin/abacus-uclibc-gcc -o xgc

Re: Debian

2004-01-22 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Michael Taylor wrote: Marc Aurele La France wrote: This came up while helping some clueless Windows exile(e): So, how come Debian stable is still at XFree86 4.1? Because that is what they had in 'testing' when they released Debian 3.0r0 (woody) back in July 2002.

Re: PFNGLXGETUSTPROC argument signed or unsigned?

2004-01-22 Thread Ian Romanick
David Dawes wrote: What is the correct typedef for PFNGLXGETUSTPROC? glxclient.h has: typedef int (* PFNGLXGETUSTPROC) ( int64_t * ust ); and it is used as a signed quantity in glxcmds.c. But most drivers use uint64_t, and src/glx/mini/dri_util.h in the Mesa trunk uses unsigned: typedef int