On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > >This thread actually started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that gcc's
> > >broken define conflicts with our driver API.
> > ISO C99:
> > 7.16
> > Boolean type and values
> > 1 The header defines four macros.
> > 2 The macro bool expands t
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
>
> >This thread actually started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that gcc's
> >broken define conflicts with our driver API.
>
> ISO C99:
>
> 7.16
>
> Boolean type and values
>
> 1 The header defi
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
>This thread actually started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that gcc's
>broken define conflicts with our driver API.
ISO C99:
7.16
Boolean type and values
1 The header defines four macros.
2 The macro bool expands to _Bool.
Which de
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote:
> >> I don't see the original comment on the mail archive - but have the
> >> impression that he's trying to use some definition that relies on the
> >> bogus "bool" from stdbool.h - So I guess the best recommendation is that
> >> he should update to the regula
Marc Aurele La France said:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
>> > Anyway, some versions of ncurses #undef bool just after #include'ing
>> > . Thomas Dickey, ncurses developer, is on this list, so if
>> > he's reading this, he probably
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> > Anyway, some versions of ncurses #undef bool just after #include'ing
> > . Thomas Dickey, ncurses developer, is on this list, so if
> > he's reading this, he probably has some suggestions.
> I overlo
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote:
> Thomas Dickey said:
> > I don't see the original comment on the mail archive - but have the
> > impression that he's trying to use some definition that relies on the
> > bogus "bool" from stdbool.h - So I guess the best recommendation is that
> > he should up
Thomas Dickey said:
> I don't see the original comment on the mail archive - but have the
> impression that he's trying to use some definition that relies on the
> bogus "bool" from stdbool.h - So I guess the best recommendation is that
> he should update to the regular release version of ncurses r
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> Redirected from xfree86@ to devel@, where this belongs.
>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 February 2004 03:42 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> > > Secondly (and perhaps more to the point), is that
> > > is a very rece
Redirected from xfree86@ to devel@, where this belongs.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2004 03:42 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> > Secondly (and perhaps more to the point), is that
> > is a very recent (glibc-wise) invention (read: bleeding edge).
> > So, in y
10 matches
Mail list logo