Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-03-05 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > >This thread actually started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that gcc's > > >broken define conflicts with our driver API. > > ISO C99: > > 7.16 > > Boolean type and values > > 1 The header defines four macros. > > 2 The macro bool expands t

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > > >This thread actually started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that gcc's > >broken define conflicts with our driver API. > > ISO C99: > > 7.16 > > Boolean type and values > > 1 The header defi

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote: >This thread actually started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that gcc's >broken define conflicts with our driver API. ISO C99: 7.16 Boolean type and values 1 The header defines four macros. 2 The macro bool expands to _Bool. Which de

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote: > >> I don't see the original comment on the mail archive - but have the > >> impression that he's trying to use some definition that relies on the > >> bogus "bool" from stdbool.h - So I guess the best recommendation is that > >> he should update to the regula

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Kelledin
Marc Aurele La France said: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote: >> > Anyway, some versions of ncurses #undef bool just after #include'ing >> > . Thomas Dickey, ncurses developer, is on this list, so if >> > he's reading this, he probably

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > > Anyway, some versions of ncurses #undef bool just after #include'ing > > . Thomas Dickey, ncurses developer, is on this list, so if > > he's reading this, he probably has some suggestions. > I overlo

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote: > Thomas Dickey said: > > I don't see the original comment on the mail archive - but have the > > impression that he's trying to use some definition that relies on the > > bogus "bool" from stdbool.h - So I guess the best recommendation is that > > he should up

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Kelledin
Thomas Dickey said: > I don't see the original comment on the mail archive - but have the > impression that he's trying to use some definition that relies on the > bogus "bool" from stdbool.h - So I guess the best recommendation is that > he should update to the regular release version of ncurses r

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > Redirected from xfree86@ to devel@, where this belongs. > > On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote: > > On Thursday 19 February 2004 03:42 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > > > Secondly (and perhaps more to the point), is that > > > is a very rece

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Marc Aurele La France
Redirected from xfree86@ to devel@, where this belongs. On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote: > On Thursday 19 February 2004 03:42 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > > Secondly (and perhaps more to the point), is that > > is a very recent (glibc-wise) invention (read: bleeding edge). > > So, in y