On 1 Mar 2003, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> MV> but XAA is an all or nothing thing.
>
> Could you please explain that? Do you mean that if you use XAA, you
> can no longer wrap at the GCOps level?
>
You can wrap them, but if you are above XAA you MUST call down.
XAA expects to see every rend
MV> but XAA is an all or nothing thing.
Could you please explain that? Do you mean that if you use XAA, you
can no longer wrap at the GCOps level?
Juliusz
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.
Mark Vojkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There isn't anything "above the XAA layer". XAA lets drivers
> hook things at 2 or 3 different levels. It's just not documented.
> Watch the LOW, MID and GC level in xaaInitAccel.c. LOW is the
> documented interface. XAA builds MID from LOW, build
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Kendall Bennett wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am trying to work out if it is possible to 'step outside the box' so to
> speak when writing an XAA driver module for XFree86 4.0. Basically there
> are some functions that we think we can implement faster if we hooked
> them at a hi
Hi Guys,
I am trying to work out if it is possible to 'step outside the box' so to
speak when writing an XAA driver module for XFree86 4.0. Basically there
are some functions that we think we can implement faster if we hooked
them at a higher level in the X server than to implement them via jus
